Acceptability of misoprostol-only medication abortion dispensed by mail-order or retail pharmacy: a qualitative study based on in-depth interviews in the United States.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Dana M Johnson, Sruthi Ramaswamy, Rebecca Gomperts
{"title":"Acceptability of misoprostol-only medication abortion dispensed by mail-order or retail pharmacy: a qualitative study based on in-depth interviews in the United States.","authors":"Dana M Johnson, Sruthi Ramaswamy, Rebecca Gomperts","doi":"10.1080/26410397.2025.2522567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The WHO recommends two medication abortion regimens, either misoprostol used with mifepristone or misoprostol-only. Both regimens are recognised as safe and effective, but in the United States (US) most abortions are completed using mifepristone and misoprostol. Given current political hostility to abortion, restrictions on mifepristone, and the long-term legal strategy to restrict nationwide access to the combined mifepristone and misoprostol regimen, more people in the US may use misoprostol-only regimens. Globally research has documented experiences with misoprostol-only abortions, but what are the experiences among people living in the US? We conducted a thematic analysis of 31 in-depth interviews with people who self-managed their abortion using misoprostol acquired from a mail-order or retail pharmacy between May and June 2020. We examine the acceptability of using misoprostol for medication abortion across three domains: the medication regimen, the mode of delivery of medications, and the overall model of care. We find that individual perceptions of misoprostol were shaped by both prior and informed knowledge. Picking up misoprostol from a retail pharmacy fostered familiarity, and having a prescription legitimised the service as an authentic medication provider. Receiving medications from the mail-order delivery model met preferences for privacy and anonymity. In reflections on the overall model, satisfaction was high across participants, but those who were adolescents at the time of their abortion had a distinct unmet need for emotional support compared to older participants. These results contribute to a growing evidence base on the acceptability of misoprostol-only regimens and mail-order and retail pharmacy service delivery models.</p>","PeriodicalId":37074,"journal":{"name":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","volume":" ","pages":"2522567"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12302387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2025.2522567","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The WHO recommends two medication abortion regimens, either misoprostol used with mifepristone or misoprostol-only. Both regimens are recognised as safe and effective, but in the United States (US) most abortions are completed using mifepristone and misoprostol. Given current political hostility to abortion, restrictions on mifepristone, and the long-term legal strategy to restrict nationwide access to the combined mifepristone and misoprostol regimen, more people in the US may use misoprostol-only regimens. Globally research has documented experiences with misoprostol-only abortions, but what are the experiences among people living in the US? We conducted a thematic analysis of 31 in-depth interviews with people who self-managed their abortion using misoprostol acquired from a mail-order or retail pharmacy between May and June 2020. We examine the acceptability of using misoprostol for medication abortion across three domains: the medication regimen, the mode of delivery of medications, and the overall model of care. We find that individual perceptions of misoprostol were shaped by both prior and informed knowledge. Picking up misoprostol from a retail pharmacy fostered familiarity, and having a prescription legitimised the service as an authentic medication provider. Receiving medications from the mail-order delivery model met preferences for privacy and anonymity. In reflections on the overall model, satisfaction was high across participants, but those who were adolescents at the time of their abortion had a distinct unmet need for emotional support compared to older participants. These results contribute to a growing evidence base on the acceptability of misoprostol-only regimens and mail-order and retail pharmacy service delivery models.

通过邮购或零售药房分发的米索前列醇药物流产的可接受性:一项基于美国深度访谈的定性研究。
世界卫生组织推荐两种药物流产方案,要么米索前列醇与米非司酮联合使用,要么只使用米索前列醇。这两种方案都被认为是安全有效的,但在美国,大多数堕胎是使用米非司酮和米索前列醇完成的。鉴于目前对堕胎的政治敌意,对米非司酮的限制,以及限制全国范围内使用米非司酮和米索前列醇联合方案的长期法律策略,更多的美国人可能只使用米索前列醇方案。全球研究已经记录了仅使用米索前列醇堕胎的经历,但是生活在美国的人有什么经历呢?我们对31名在2020年5月至6月期间使用从邮购或零售药店购买的米索前列醇自我管理堕胎的人进行了深入访谈,并对其进行了主题分析。我们从三个方面考察了米索前列醇用于药物流产的可接受性:药物治疗方案、药物输送模式和整体护理模式。我们发现个人对米索前列醇的认知是由先前的和知情的知识形成的。从零售药店买到米索前列醇会让人熟悉,而且有处方也使该服务成为合法的药品供应商。从邮购递送模式接收药物符合隐私和匿名的偏好。在对整体模型的反思中,参与者的满意度很高,但那些在堕胎时是青少年的人与年长的参与者相比,对情感支持的需求明显没有得到满足。这些结果有助于提供越来越多的证据,证明仅使用米索前列醇的方案以及邮购和零售药房服务交付模式的可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: SRHM is a multidisciplinary journal, welcoming submissions from a wide range of disciplines, including the social sciences and humanities, behavioural science, public health, human rights and law. The journal welcomes a range of methodological approaches, including qualitative and quantitative analyses such as policy analysis; mixed methods approaches to public health and health systems research; economic, political and historical analysis; and epidemiological work with a focus on SRHR. Key topics addressed in SRHM include (but are not limited to) abortion, family planning, contraception, female genital mutilation, HIV and other STIs, human papillomavirus (HPV), maternal health, SRHR in humanitarian settings, gender-based and other forms of interpersonal violence, young people, gender, sexuality, sexual rights and sexual pleasure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信