Top‒down animal welfare crisis communication during the COVID-19 pandemic: Animal care worker information sources, self-perceived knowledge and welfare concerns.

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary Record Pub Date : 2025-07-19 Epub Date: 2025-06-19 DOI:10.1002/vetr.5498
Sharmaine L Miller, Joyce X Kwan, Kathryn R Dalton, Kaitlin B Waite, Meghan F Davis
{"title":"Top‒down animal welfare crisis communication during the COVID-19 pandemic: Animal care worker information sources, self-perceived knowledge and welfare concerns.","authors":"Sharmaine L Miller, Joyce X Kwan, Kathryn R Dalton, Kaitlin B Waite, Meghan F Davis","doi":"10.1002/vetr.5498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Experts communicating reliable and timely information are critical during public health crises. While assessments of human health crisis communication and preparedness have received attention, population animal welfare assessments are limited. This study assessed animal care worker (ACW) survey responses to identify factors potentially valuable for preparedness and intervention design for future crises that affect companion animals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our team took a subset of data from a US survey (conducted between July and October 2020) to investigate small animal veterinary (SAV; N = 1209) and animal shelter, rescue and control (SRC; N = 132) COVID-19 pandemic concerns pertinent to animal welfare, self-perceived knowledge of pandemic impacts, and update frequency and information sources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with SAV workers, SRC workers more often reported frequent communication (p < 0.001), self-perceived expert knowledge (p = 0.012) and having welfare concerns (p = 0.012). The same was true for clinical SRC workers, more so than non-clinical SRC. Frequent updates correlated with greater self-perceived knowledge (p < 0.001). Information sources were primarily animal welfare focused for SRC workers and veterinary health focused for SAV.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Community socioeconomic status and update contents are unknown. Furthermore, sample diversity was low, which may limit the generalisability of the findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a potential need for increased, more harmonised crisis communication from leading public and animal health entities to better support SAV and clinical SRC workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23560,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Record","volume":" ","pages":"e5498"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Record","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.5498","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Experts communicating reliable and timely information are critical during public health crises. While assessments of human health crisis communication and preparedness have received attention, population animal welfare assessments are limited. This study assessed animal care worker (ACW) survey responses to identify factors potentially valuable for preparedness and intervention design for future crises that affect companion animals.

Methods: Our team took a subset of data from a US survey (conducted between July and October 2020) to investigate small animal veterinary (SAV; N = 1209) and animal shelter, rescue and control (SRC; N = 132) COVID-19 pandemic concerns pertinent to animal welfare, self-perceived knowledge of pandemic impacts, and update frequency and information sources.

Results: Compared with SAV workers, SRC workers more often reported frequent communication (p < 0.001), self-perceived expert knowledge (p = 0.012) and having welfare concerns (p = 0.012). The same was true for clinical SRC workers, more so than non-clinical SRC. Frequent updates correlated with greater self-perceived knowledge (p < 0.001). Information sources were primarily animal welfare focused for SRC workers and veterinary health focused for SAV.

Limitations: Community socioeconomic status and update contents are unknown. Furthermore, sample diversity was low, which may limit the generalisability of the findings.

Conclusion: There is a potential need for increased, more harmonised crisis communication from leading public and animal health entities to better support SAV and clinical SRC workers.

COVID-19大流行期间自上而下的动物福利危机沟通:动物护理工作者的信息来源、自我认知知识和福利关注
背景:在公共卫生危机期间,专家传达可靠和及时的信息至关重要。虽然对人类健康、危机沟通和防备的评估得到了重视,但对种群动物福利的评估有限。本研究评估了动物护理工作者(ACW)的调查结果,以确定潜在有价值的因素,为未来影响伴侣动物的危机做好准备和干预设计。方法:我们的团队从美国的一项调查(在2020年7月至10月期间进行)中提取了一部分数据,以调查小动物兽医(SAV;N = 1209)和动物收容所、救援和控制(SRC;N = 132)与动物福利相关的COVID-19大流行关注,对大流行影响的自我认知,以及更新频率和信息来源。结果:与SAV员工相比,SRC员工更频繁地报告沟通(p < 0.001)、自我感知的专业知识(p = 0.012)和福利关注(p = 0.012)。与非临床SRC相比,临床SRC工作者的情况也是如此。频繁更新与更高的自我感知知识相关(p < 0.001)。信息来源主要是SRC工人关注的动物福利和SAV关注的兽医健康。局限性:社区社会经济状况和更新内容未知。此外,样本多样性较低,这可能限制了研究结果的普遍性。结论:潜在需要增加和协调主要公共和动物卫生实体的危机沟通,以更好地支持SAV和临床SRC工作人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Record
Veterinary Record 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Record (branded as Vet Record) is the official journal of the British Veterinary Association (BVA) and has been published weekly since 1888. It contains news, opinion, letters, scientific reviews and original research papers and communications on a wide range of veterinary topics, along with disease surveillance reports, obituaries, careers information, business and innovation news and summaries of research papers in other journals. It is published on behalf of the BVA by BMJ Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信