Evaluation of clinical and volumetric outcomes following adaptive gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Venkatesh S Madhugiri, Victor Goulenko, Lokesh Seth, Richard Wang, Sarunas Tamasauskas, Neil D Almeida, Andrew J Fabiano, Lindsay J Lipinski, Kenneth V Snyder, Robert J Plunkett, Robert A Fenstermaker, Matthew B Podgorsak, Dheerendra Prasad
{"title":"Evaluation of clinical and volumetric outcomes following adaptive gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases.","authors":"Venkatesh S Madhugiri, Victor Goulenko, Lokesh Seth, Richard Wang, Sarunas Tamasauskas, Neil D Almeida, Andrew J Fabiano, Lindsay J Lipinski, Kenneth V Snyder, Robert J Plunkett, Robert A Fenstermaker, Matthew B Podgorsak, Dheerendra Prasad","doi":"10.1007/s11060-025-05138-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery is an effective technique to treat larger brain metastases and post-surgical cavities. Adaptive Gamma Knife radiosurgery (aGKRS), involving repeat magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and replanning based on modified lesion contours, has emerged as a solution to account for inter-fraction tumor dynamics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of adaptive planning on treatment metrics, radiation dose to structures at risk (SARs), and clinical and radiologic outcomes in patients with brain metastases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over an 8-year period (2016-2023), 31 patients were treated with aGKRS to 48 brain metastases. Lesions were re-contoured and adaptive plans created using updated MRIs acquired prior to the second radiation fraction. Treatment metrics, including target coverage, Paddick Conformity Index (PCI), Gradient Index (GI), and doses to SARs, were analyzed. Clinical outcomes and radiologic response were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lesion volumes changed significantly between radiation fractions (mean change- 28.25%). aGKRS resulted in significant improvements in target coverage, from 91.9% on non-adaptive plans to 97.02% following adaptive replanning. The PCI improved by 35.3% across plans in this series. Adaptive plans also reduced the dose to SARs by an average of 4.7%. Radiologic response was excellent- median volume reduction of treated lesions was 98.9%. Clinically, 72% of patients either remained stable or improved in neurologic status; 32% improved in performance status by at least one grade.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lesion dynamics during hypofractionated treatments pose a significant challenge to the delivery of conformal and safe SRS treatments. aGKRS significantly improves dosimetric parameters, reduces radiation to SARs, and enhances clinical and radiologic outcomes for brain metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-05138-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery is an effective technique to treat larger brain metastases and post-surgical cavities. Adaptive Gamma Knife radiosurgery (aGKRS), involving repeat magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and replanning based on modified lesion contours, has emerged as a solution to account for inter-fraction tumor dynamics.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of adaptive planning on treatment metrics, radiation dose to structures at risk (SARs), and clinical and radiologic outcomes in patients with brain metastases.

Methods: Over an 8-year period (2016-2023), 31 patients were treated with aGKRS to 48 brain metastases. Lesions were re-contoured and adaptive plans created using updated MRIs acquired prior to the second radiation fraction. Treatment metrics, including target coverage, Paddick Conformity Index (PCI), Gradient Index (GI), and doses to SARs, were analyzed. Clinical outcomes and radiologic response were assessed.

Results: Lesion volumes changed significantly between radiation fractions (mean change- 28.25%). aGKRS resulted in significant improvements in target coverage, from 91.9% on non-adaptive plans to 97.02% following adaptive replanning. The PCI improved by 35.3% across plans in this series. Adaptive plans also reduced the dose to SARs by an average of 4.7%. Radiologic response was excellent- median volume reduction of treated lesions was 98.9%. Clinically, 72% of patients either remained stable or improved in neurologic status; 32% improved in performance status by at least one grade.

Conclusion: Lesion dynamics during hypofractionated treatments pose a significant challenge to the delivery of conformal and safe SRS treatments. aGKRS significantly improves dosimetric parameters, reduces radiation to SARs, and enhances clinical and radiologic outcomes for brain metastases.

评估适应性伽玛刀放射治疗脑转移瘤的临床和体积结果。
背景:低分割立体定向放射治疗是治疗较大脑转移瘤和术后空腔的有效技术。适应性伽玛刀放射外科(aGKRS),包括重复磁共振成像(MRI)和基于修改的病变轮廓的重新规划,已经成为解释肿瘤内部动态的解决方案。目的:评估适应性计划对脑转移患者的治疗指标、危险结构辐射剂量(SARs)以及临床和放射学结果的影响。方法:在2016-2023年的8年时间里,31例患者接受了aGKRS治疗,其中48例脑转移。利用第二次放疗前获得的最新核磁共振成像,重新勾画病灶轮廓并制定适应性计划。分析治疗指标,包括目标覆盖率、帕迪克符合性指数(PCI)、梯度指数(GI)和SARs剂量。评估临床结果和放射学反应。结果:不同部位间病变体积变化显著(平均变化28.25%)。aGKRS显著提高了目标覆盖率,从非适应性计划的91.9%提高到适应性重新规划后的97.02%。在本系列的各个计划中,PCI提高了35.3%。适应性计划还使SARs的剂量平均减少4.7%。放射学反应非常好,治疗后病变的中位体积缩小率为98.9%。临床上,72%的患者神经系统状态保持稳定或改善;32%的学生成绩至少提高了一级。结论:在低分割治疗过程中,病变动态对提供适形和安全的SRS治疗提出了重大挑战。aGKRS显著改善了剂量学参数,减少了对SARs的辐射,并提高了脑转移的临床和放射预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
277
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信