{"title":"Moving beyond the syndrome: how can acute kidney injury phenotypes help?","authors":"Jennifer Scott, Emily J See, Yvelynne P Kelly","doi":"10.1097/MNH.0000000000001098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The purpose of this review is to describe recent and important updates in acute kidney injury (AKI) phenotyping that help us to move beyond the clinical syndrome of AKI.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies reinforce the utility of damage biomarker positivity in AKI classification and have found that biomarker positivity (specifically NGAL) adds prognostic information regardless of classification of the AKI according to RIFLE or KDIGO criteria, and regardless of cut-off selection methodology. Novel methodologies for identifying AKI phenotypes and subphenotypes are currently being developed and integrated subclassification approaches e.g. combining biomarker and transcriptomic approaches, have been found to be more informative than using a single approach alone to identify AKI phenotypes. Consortiums have developed in partnership between academia and industry to identify consensus endotypes for critically ill adults and children.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There are prognostic and treatment benefits to AKI phenotyping and subphenotyping which allow us to provide a customized approach to AKI care. Challenges currently exist to implementation of AKI phenotyping at the bedside but ongoing projects are already seeking solutions for feasible bedside identification of subphenotypes using machine-learning or point-of-care biomarker assays. Future research in this area will focus on the ability to recognize and link endotypes, subphenotypes and phenotypes in AKI.</p>","PeriodicalId":10960,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNH.0000000000001098","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: The purpose of this review is to describe recent and important updates in acute kidney injury (AKI) phenotyping that help us to move beyond the clinical syndrome of AKI.
Recent findings: Recent studies reinforce the utility of damage biomarker positivity in AKI classification and have found that biomarker positivity (specifically NGAL) adds prognostic information regardless of classification of the AKI according to RIFLE or KDIGO criteria, and regardless of cut-off selection methodology. Novel methodologies for identifying AKI phenotypes and subphenotypes are currently being developed and integrated subclassification approaches e.g. combining biomarker and transcriptomic approaches, have been found to be more informative than using a single approach alone to identify AKI phenotypes. Consortiums have developed in partnership between academia and industry to identify consensus endotypes for critically ill adults and children.
Summary: There are prognostic and treatment benefits to AKI phenotyping and subphenotyping which allow us to provide a customized approach to AKI care. Challenges currently exist to implementation of AKI phenotyping at the bedside but ongoing projects are already seeking solutions for feasible bedside identification of subphenotypes using machine-learning or point-of-care biomarker assays. Future research in this area will focus on the ability to recognize and link endotypes, subphenotypes and phenotypes in AKI.
期刊介绍:
A reader-friendly resource, Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension provides an up-to-date account of the most important advances in the field of nephrology and hypertension. Each issue contains either two or three sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive coverage of all the key issues, including pathophysiology of hypertension, circulation and hemodynamics, and clinical nephrology. Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.