Assessment of Burden of Partial Response to Standard Doses of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients with Clinically Diagnosed Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Real-World Evidence Study in India.

IF 1.9 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yogesh Garje, Rajiv Saikia, Sunil Gupta, Soujanya Peri, Praveen Sharma, Shruti Dharmadhikari, Ashwini Satpathy, Chintan Khandhedia, Neeraj Markandeywar, Amey Mane, Suyog Mehta, Sadhna Joglekar
{"title":"Assessment of Burden of Partial Response to Standard Doses of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients with Clinically Diagnosed Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Real-World Evidence Study in India.","authors":"Yogesh Garje, Rajiv Saikia, Sunil Gupta, Soujanya Peri, Praveen Sharma, Shruti Dharmadhikari, Ashwini Satpathy, Chintan Khandhedia, Neeraj Markandeywar, Amey Mane, Suyog Mehta, Sadhna Joglekar","doi":"10.1007/s40801-025-00497-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Partial response to standard-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common, yet real-world data on its burden and management in Indian settings remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to understand the burden, clinical profile, drug utilization patterns across specialties, the effectiveness of Pantoprazole 80 mg dual delayed-release (DDR) formulation, and management strategies used in the treatment of partial responders with clinically diagnosed GERD in Indian settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicentric, retrospective observational study. Data on adult patients with GERD with a follow-up duration of at least 4 weeks from baseline were extracted from electronic medical records (EMR) of outpatient settings from five centers, which included drug utilization patterns, clinical and treatment profiles, and effectiveness of PPIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among EMRs of 5205 patients with GERD, 38.0% were on rabeprazole and 36.6% on pantoprazole (mean age: 53.3 years; standard deviation: 14.3 years), and 55.0% were male. Heartburn was the primary complaint in 76.0% of cases. Cardiovascular co-morbidities with dyslipidemia were reported in 66.7% (1742/2610) patients. Pantoprazole and rabeprazole were preferred across specialties, where 31.1% (592/1906) and 17.7% (350/1979) adhered to treatment, respectively. Total burden of partial responders was 41.7%, including patients who switched PPIs, changed PPI dosage, or added other medications. Pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily (BD) showed 49.1% improvement in heartburn and 50.9% in abdominal pain. Pantoprazole 80 mg DDR once daily demonstrated significantly higher symptom relief, with a 60.2% reduction in heartburn (p < 0.001) and a 66.1% reduction in abdominal pain (p < 0.001). These findings suggest that higher-dose pantoprazole therapy may be a clinically effective strategy for managing partial responders to standard-dose PPIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant proportion of patients with GERD were partial responders to PPIs. Pantoprazole and rabeprazole had high patient adherence across disciplines. Both pantoprazole DDR 80 mg once daily (OD) and 40 mg BD demonstrated significant symptom reduction in partial responders, supporting their use in optimizing GERD management in Indian clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11282,"journal":{"name":"Drugs - Real World Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs - Real World Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-025-00497-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Partial response to standard-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common, yet real-world data on its burden and management in Indian settings remain limited.

Objective: This study aimed to understand the burden, clinical profile, drug utilization patterns across specialties, the effectiveness of Pantoprazole 80 mg dual delayed-release (DDR) formulation, and management strategies used in the treatment of partial responders with clinically diagnosed GERD in Indian settings.

Methods: This was a multicentric, retrospective observational study. Data on adult patients with GERD with a follow-up duration of at least 4 weeks from baseline were extracted from electronic medical records (EMR) of outpatient settings from five centers, which included drug utilization patterns, clinical and treatment profiles, and effectiveness of PPIs.

Results: Among EMRs of 5205 patients with GERD, 38.0% were on rabeprazole and 36.6% on pantoprazole (mean age: 53.3 years; standard deviation: 14.3 years), and 55.0% were male. Heartburn was the primary complaint in 76.0% of cases. Cardiovascular co-morbidities with dyslipidemia were reported in 66.7% (1742/2610) patients. Pantoprazole and rabeprazole were preferred across specialties, where 31.1% (592/1906) and 17.7% (350/1979) adhered to treatment, respectively. Total burden of partial responders was 41.7%, including patients who switched PPIs, changed PPI dosage, or added other medications. Pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily (BD) showed 49.1% improvement in heartburn and 50.9% in abdominal pain. Pantoprazole 80 mg DDR once daily demonstrated significantly higher symptom relief, with a 60.2% reduction in heartburn (p < 0.001) and a 66.1% reduction in abdominal pain (p < 0.001). These findings suggest that higher-dose pantoprazole therapy may be a clinically effective strategy for managing partial responders to standard-dose PPIs.

Conclusions: A significant proportion of patients with GERD were partial responders to PPIs. Pantoprazole and rabeprazole had high patient adherence across disciplines. Both pantoprazole DDR 80 mg once daily (OD) and 40 mg BD demonstrated significant symptom reduction in partial responders, supporting their use in optimizing GERD management in Indian clinical settings.

临床诊断为胃食管反流病的患者对标准剂量质子泵抑制剂部分反应负担的评估:印度的一项真实世界证据研究
背景:胃食管反流病(GERD)患者对标准剂量质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)的部分反应是常见的,但在印度,关于其负担和管理的真实数据仍然有限。目的:本研究旨在了解印度临床诊断为胃食管反流的部分缓解者的负担、临床概况、各专科的药物使用模式、泮托拉唑80 mg双延迟释放(DDR)制剂的有效性以及治疗策略。方法:这是一项多中心、回顾性观察性研究。从5个中心门诊设置的电子病历(EMR)中提取成人胃食管反流症患者的数据,从基线开始随访至少4周,包括药物使用模式、临床和治疗概况以及PPIs的有效性。结果:5205例胃食管反流患者的emr中,38.0%的患者使用雷贝拉唑,36.6%的患者使用泮托拉唑(平均年龄53.3岁;标准差:14.3岁),55.0%为男性。76.0%的病例以胃灼热为主要主诉。66.7%(1742/2610)的患者报告了心血管合并症与血脂异常。各专科首选泮托拉唑和雷贝拉唑,分别有31.1%(592/1906)和17.7%(350/1979)坚持治疗。部分缓解者的总负担为41.7%,包括更换PPI、改变PPI剂量或添加其他药物的患者。泮托拉唑40mg,每日两次(BD),胃灼热改善49.1%,腹痛改善50.9%。每日一次泮托拉唑80mg DDR显示出明显更高的症状缓解,胃灼热减少60.2% (p < 0.001),腹痛减少66.1% (p < 0.001)。这些发现表明,高剂量泮托拉唑治疗可能是治疗标准剂量PPIs部分反应的临床有效策略。结论:相当比例的胃食管反流患者对ppi有部分反应。泮托拉唑和雷贝拉唑的患者跨学科依从性高。泮托拉唑DDR 80mg每日一次(OD)和40mg BD均显示部分缓解者的症状显著减轻,支持其在印度临床环境中优化胃食管反流管理的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs - Real World Outcomes
Drugs - Real World Outcomes PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs - Real World Outcomes targets original research and definitive reviews regarding the use of real-world data to evaluate health outcomes and inform healthcare decision-making on drugs, devices and other interventions in clinical practice. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas: Using registries/databases/health records and other non-selected observational datasets to investigate: drug use and treatment outcomes prescription patterns drug safety signals adherence to treatment guidelines benefit : risk profiles comparative effectiveness economic analyses including cost-of-illness Data-driven research methodologies, including the capture, curation, search, sharing, analysis and interpretation of ‘big data’ Techniques and approaches to optimise real-world modelling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信