Landscape-scale endophytic community analyses in replicated grapevine stands reveal that dieback disease is unlikely to be caused by specific fungal communities.

IF 3.9 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Vinciane Monod, Valérie Hofstetter, Olivier Viret, Vivian Zufferey, Katia Gindro, Daniel Croll
{"title":"Landscape-scale endophytic community analyses in replicated grapevine stands reveal that dieback disease is unlikely to be caused by specific fungal communities.","authors":"Vinciane Monod, Valérie Hofstetter, Olivier Viret, Vivian Zufferey, Katia Gindro, Daniel Croll","doi":"10.1128/aem.00782-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tree diebacks are complex and multifactorial diseases with suspected biotic and abiotic components. Microbiome effects on plant health are challenging to assess due to the complexity of fungal and bacterial communities. Grapevine wood dieback is the main threat to sustainable production worldwide, and no causality with microbial species has been established despite long-standing claims of fungal drivers. Here, we aimed to test the hypothesis that grapevine esca disease progression has reproducible drivers in the fungal species community. For this, we analyzed a set of 21 vineyards planted simultaneously with a single susceptible cultivar to provide unprecedented replication at the landscape scale. We sampled a total of 496 plants at the graft union across vineyards in 2 different years to perform deep amplicon sequencing analyses of the fungal communities inhabiting grapevine trunks. The communities were highly diverse with a total of 4,129 amplified sequence variants assigned to 697 distinct species. We detected trunk fungal community shifts over years of sampling, vineyards and climatic conditions, as well as disease status. However, we detect no specific fungal species driving symptom development across vineyards, contrary to long-standing expectations. The high degree of environmental standardization in the decade-long experimental plots and the well-powered replication provide the clearest evidence yet that grapevine wood dieback is most likely caused by environmental factors rather than specific pathogens. Furthermore, our study shows how landscape-scale replicated field surveys allow for powerful hypothesis testing for complex dieback disease drivers and prioritize future research directions.IMPORTANCETree diebacks are complex diseases suspected to be caused by both biological and environmental drivers. Grapevine wood dieback is a major threat to vineyards worldwide, but no specific microbial species have been experimentally implicated, despite claims that fungi are causing the symptoms. Here, we tested whether the progression of grapevine esca disease is driven by specific fungal species. We analyzed 21 long-established vineyards planted at the same time with the same susceptible grape variety to ensure consistent conditions. Over the years, we observed changes in the fungal communities inhabiting the trunk depending on the vineyard, climate, and disease status. However, contrary to expectations, we did not detect any specific fungal species that consistently could cause symptoms across the vineyards. The high level of environmental control and replication in our study provides strong evidence that grapevine wood dieback is more likely caused by environmental factors rather than specific pathogens.</p>","PeriodicalId":8002,"journal":{"name":"Applied and Environmental Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0078225"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied and Environmental Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00782-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tree diebacks are complex and multifactorial diseases with suspected biotic and abiotic components. Microbiome effects on plant health are challenging to assess due to the complexity of fungal and bacterial communities. Grapevine wood dieback is the main threat to sustainable production worldwide, and no causality with microbial species has been established despite long-standing claims of fungal drivers. Here, we aimed to test the hypothesis that grapevine esca disease progression has reproducible drivers in the fungal species community. For this, we analyzed a set of 21 vineyards planted simultaneously with a single susceptible cultivar to provide unprecedented replication at the landscape scale. We sampled a total of 496 plants at the graft union across vineyards in 2 different years to perform deep amplicon sequencing analyses of the fungal communities inhabiting grapevine trunks. The communities were highly diverse with a total of 4,129 amplified sequence variants assigned to 697 distinct species. We detected trunk fungal community shifts over years of sampling, vineyards and climatic conditions, as well as disease status. However, we detect no specific fungal species driving symptom development across vineyards, contrary to long-standing expectations. The high degree of environmental standardization in the decade-long experimental plots and the well-powered replication provide the clearest evidence yet that grapevine wood dieback is most likely caused by environmental factors rather than specific pathogens. Furthermore, our study shows how landscape-scale replicated field surveys allow for powerful hypothesis testing for complex dieback disease drivers and prioritize future research directions.IMPORTANCETree diebacks are complex diseases suspected to be caused by both biological and environmental drivers. Grapevine wood dieback is a major threat to vineyards worldwide, but no specific microbial species have been experimentally implicated, despite claims that fungi are causing the symptoms. Here, we tested whether the progression of grapevine esca disease is driven by specific fungal species. We analyzed 21 long-established vineyards planted at the same time with the same susceptible grape variety to ensure consistent conditions. Over the years, we observed changes in the fungal communities inhabiting the trunk depending on the vineyard, climate, and disease status. However, contrary to expectations, we did not detect any specific fungal species that consistently could cause symptoms across the vineyards. The high level of environmental control and replication in our study provides strong evidence that grapevine wood dieback is more likely caused by environmental factors rather than specific pathogens.

复制葡萄藤林分的景观尺度内生群落分析表明,枯死病不太可能是由特定的真菌群落引起的。
树木枯枝病是一种复杂的多因素疾病,疑似有生物和非生物成分。由于真菌和细菌群落的复杂性,微生物组对植物健康的影响具有挑战性。葡萄藤木枯死是全球可持续生产的主要威胁,尽管真菌驱动因素长期存在,但尚未确定与微生物物种的因果关系。在这里,我们的目的是验证葡萄藤esca疾病进展在真菌物种群落中具有可复制驱动因素的假设。为此,我们分析了一组21个葡萄园,同时种植一个单一的易感品种,以提供前所未有的景观规模复制。我们在两个不同的年份对葡萄树干上的真菌群落进行了深度扩增子测序分析,共取样了496株葡萄植株。群落多样性较高,共有4129个扩增序列变异归属于697个不同种。我们检测了树干真菌群落在多年取样、葡萄园和气候条件以及疾病状态下的变化。然而,与长期以来的预期相反,我们没有发现特定的真菌物种驱动葡萄园的症状发展。在长达十年的试验田中,高度的环境标准化和良好的复制提供了最明确的证据,证明葡萄藤木枯死最有可能是由环境因素引起的,而不是特定的病原体。此外,我们的研究表明,景观尺度的重复实地调查如何允许对复杂的枯死病驱动因素进行强有力的假设检验,并优先考虑未来的研究方向。树木枯死是一种复杂的疾病,怀疑是由生物和环境驱动因素引起的。葡萄藤木枯死是全球葡萄园的主要威胁,但没有特定的微生物物种被实验牵连,尽管声称真菌是引起症状的原因。在这里,我们测试了葡萄藤esca病的进展是否由特定的真菌物种驱动。我们分析了21个历史悠久的葡萄园,在同一时间种植相同的易感葡萄品种,以确保一致的条件。多年来,我们观察到寄生在树干上的真菌群落的变化取决于葡萄园、气候和疾病状况。然而,与预期相反的是,我们没有发现任何特定的真菌种类,这些真菌会在整个葡萄园中引起症状。本研究中高水平的环境控制和复制提供了强有力的证据,证明葡萄木枯死更可能是由环境因素而不是特定病原体引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Applied and Environmental Microbiology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.30%
发文量
730
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: Applied and Environmental Microbiology (AEM) publishes papers that make significant contributions to (a) applied microbiology, including biotechnology, protein engineering, bioremediation, and food microbiology, (b) microbial ecology, including environmental, organismic, and genomic microbiology, and (c) interdisciplinary microbiology, including invertebrate microbiology, plant microbiology, aquatic microbiology, and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信