Estimation of Dopamine D1 Receptor Agonist Binding Kinetics Using Time-Resolved Functional Assays: Relation to Agonist-Induced Receptor Internalization by Investigational Antiparkinsonian Therapeutics.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Kristoffer Sahlholm, Peder Svensson, Marcus Malo, Daniel R Andersson, Nibal Betari
{"title":"Estimation of Dopamine D<sub>1</sub> Receptor Agonist Binding Kinetics Using Time-Resolved Functional Assays: Relation to Agonist-Induced Receptor Internalization by Investigational Antiparkinsonian Therapeutics.","authors":"Kristoffer Sahlholm, Peder Svensson, Marcus Malo, Daniel R Andersson, Nibal Betari","doi":"10.1021/acschemneuro.5c00270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The dopamine D<sub>1</sub> receptor (D<sub>1</sub>R) is prominently expressed in the striatum and cerebral cortex and is an attractive target for treating Parkinson's disease and cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. While newer, noncatechol D<sub>1</sub>R agonists such as tavapadon have shown promise in recent clinical trials, the therapeutic utility of earlier catechol agonists such as A77636 was hampered by tolerance development. The mechanism underlying tolerance induction was suggested to involve very slow A77636 dissociation from the D<sub>1</sub>R, promoting prominent arrestin recruitment and receptor internalization associated with delayed recycling to the cell surface. Here, we compared the signaling and binding kinetics of five D<sub>1</sub>R agonists─dopamine, dihydrexidine, apomorphine, A77636, and tavapadon─using two time-resolved assays of agonist-induced β-arrestin2 recruitment and G protein-coupled inward rectifier potassium (GIRK, also known as Kir3) channel activation, respectively. Additionally, D<sub>1</sub>R internalization was studied using cell-surface ELISA. Tavapadon and apomorphine did not induce significant D<sub>1</sub>R internalization, whereas pronounced internalization was observed with A77636, dopamine, and dihydrexidine. GIRK response deactivation time courses upon agonist washout were longer for A77636 and tavapadon compared to dopamine, dihydrexidine, and apomorphine. Similarly, in the β-arrestin2 assay, signal decay upon antagonist addition was slower for A77636 and tavapadon compared to the other three agonists. Tavapadon and apomorphine were partial agonists in both assays, whereas A77636 and dihydrexidine showed efficacies similar to dopamine. While our results do not provide evidence for a direct correlation between agonist dissociation and liability to tolerance induction, the possibility remains that certain combinations of agonist characteristics, such as high efficacy paired with slow dissociation, are associated with tolerance induction by D<sub>1</sub>R agonists.</p>","PeriodicalId":13,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Chemical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.5c00270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dopamine D1 receptor (D1R) is prominently expressed in the striatum and cerebral cortex and is an attractive target for treating Parkinson's disease and cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. While newer, noncatechol D1R agonists such as tavapadon have shown promise in recent clinical trials, the therapeutic utility of earlier catechol agonists such as A77636 was hampered by tolerance development. The mechanism underlying tolerance induction was suggested to involve very slow A77636 dissociation from the D1R, promoting prominent arrestin recruitment and receptor internalization associated with delayed recycling to the cell surface. Here, we compared the signaling and binding kinetics of five D1R agonists─dopamine, dihydrexidine, apomorphine, A77636, and tavapadon─using two time-resolved assays of agonist-induced β-arrestin2 recruitment and G protein-coupled inward rectifier potassium (GIRK, also known as Kir3) channel activation, respectively. Additionally, D1R internalization was studied using cell-surface ELISA. Tavapadon and apomorphine did not induce significant D1R internalization, whereas pronounced internalization was observed with A77636, dopamine, and dihydrexidine. GIRK response deactivation time courses upon agonist washout were longer for A77636 and tavapadon compared to dopamine, dihydrexidine, and apomorphine. Similarly, in the β-arrestin2 assay, signal decay upon antagonist addition was slower for A77636 and tavapadon compared to the other three agonists. Tavapadon and apomorphine were partial agonists in both assays, whereas A77636 and dihydrexidine showed efficacies similar to dopamine. While our results do not provide evidence for a direct correlation between agonist dissociation and liability to tolerance induction, the possibility remains that certain combinations of agonist characteristics, such as high efficacy paired with slow dissociation, are associated with tolerance induction by D1R agonists.

用时间解析功能测定法估计多巴胺D1受体激动剂结合动力学:与研究性抗帕金森治疗中激动剂诱导的受体内化的关系。
多巴胺D1受体(D1R)在纹状体和大脑皮层中显著表达,是治疗帕金森病和精神分裂症认知障碍的一个有吸引力的靶点。虽然较新的非儿茶酚类D1R激动剂(如tavapadon)在最近的临床试验中显示出前景,但早期儿茶酚类激动剂(如A77636)的治疗效用受到耐受性发展的阻碍。耐受性诱导的机制可能涉及A77636与D1R的缓慢分离,促进显著的阻滞蛋白募集和受体内化,这与延迟再循环到细胞表面有关。在这里,我们比较了五种D1R激动剂──多巴胺、二氢西定、阿波啡、A77636和tavapadon──的信号传导和结合动力学,分别使用激动剂诱导的β-arrestin2募集和G蛋白偶联内向整流钾(GIRK,也称为Kir3)通道激活的两种时间分辨试验。此外,采用细胞表面ELISA法研究D1R内化。Tavapadon和apomorphine没有诱导D1R内化,而A77636、多巴胺和二氢西啶则有明显的内化。与多巴胺、二氢西定和阿波啡相比,A77636和他瓦帕酮在激动剂洗脱后的GIRK反应失活时间更长。同样,在β-arrestin2实验中,与其他三种激动剂相比,A77636和tavapadon加入拮抗剂后的信号衰减速度较慢。Tavapadon和apomorphine在两项试验中均为部分激动剂,而A77636和二羟赛定的效果与多巴胺相似。虽然我们的研究结果没有提供证据证明激动剂解离与耐受诱导之间存在直接关联,但仍然有可能存在激动剂特性的某些组合,如高效率与缓慢解离相结合,与D1R激动剂诱导耐受有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
ACS Chemical Neuroscience BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
323
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: ACS Chemical Neuroscience publishes high-quality research articles and reviews that showcase chemical, quantitative biological, biophysical and bioengineering approaches to the understanding of the nervous system and to the development of new treatments for neurological disorders. Research in the journal focuses on aspects of chemical neurobiology and bio-neurochemistry such as the following: Neurotransmitters and receptors Neuropharmaceuticals and therapeutics Neural development—Plasticity, and degeneration Chemical, physical, and computational methods in neuroscience Neuronal diseases—basis, detection, and treatment Mechanism of aging, learning, memory and behavior Pain and sensory processing Neurotoxins Neuroscience-inspired bioengineering Development of methods in chemical neurobiology Neuroimaging agents and technologies Animal models for central nervous system diseases Behavioral research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信