Impact of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy on Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics in Hepatitis C Virus Nucleic Acid Testing-Positive Transplant Recipients

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jared Walz, Glen Leverson, Lily Stalter, John Rice, David Al-Adra, Joshua J. Wiegel
{"title":"Impact of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy on Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics in Hepatitis C Virus Nucleic Acid Testing-Positive Transplant Recipients","authors":"Jared Walz,&nbsp;Glen Leverson,&nbsp;Lily Stalter,&nbsp;John Rice,&nbsp;David Al-Adra,&nbsp;Joshua J. Wiegel","doi":"10.1155/jcpt/5727663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Purpose:</b>​ Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) against hepatitis C virus (HCV) such as sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) are effective in treating recipients of organs infected with HCV. The objective of this project is to identify changes in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics throughout DAA therapy in recipients of abdominal transplants from nucleic acid testing-positive (NAT+) donors.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Adult kidney or liver transplant recipients transplanted between 4/22/2019 and 6/23/2022 were included. Recipients of HCV NAT+ organs were treated with DAAs based on institutional protocol and insurance preference. Recipients of HCV NAT− organs from donors who fit Public Health Service (PHS) risk criteria for HCV transmission were included in the comparator group. Tacrolimus doses and concentrations were collected at DAA initiation and cessation and at the time of sustained virologic response assessment at 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR12); these time points were matched in the NAT− control group. The primary outcome was difference in concentration-to-dose ratio (C/D) change (ΔC/D) over time between NAT+ and NAT− organ recipients.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> At DAA initiation, NAT+ organ recipients required a lower tacrolimus dose to reach goal than NAT− organ recipients (ΔC/D NAT+ = −0.41, ΔC/D NAT− 0.60, <i>p</i> = 0.01); however, a known tacrolimus interaction with fluconazole—administered to liver transplant recipients at high risk for invasive fungal infection (IFI)—represents a significant confounding factor. No differences in average C/D ratio between NAT+ and NAT− organ recipients were identified at any time point.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> These results do not support empiric dose adjustments based on donor HCV NAT status or antiviral therapy.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jcpt/5727663","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jcpt/5727663","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose:​ Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) against hepatitis C virus (HCV) such as sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) are effective in treating recipients of organs infected with HCV. The objective of this project is to identify changes in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics throughout DAA therapy in recipients of abdominal transplants from nucleic acid testing-positive (NAT+) donors.

Methods: Adult kidney or liver transplant recipients transplanted between 4/22/2019 and 6/23/2022 were included. Recipients of HCV NAT+ organs were treated with DAAs based on institutional protocol and insurance preference. Recipients of HCV NAT− organs from donors who fit Public Health Service (PHS) risk criteria for HCV transmission were included in the comparator group. Tacrolimus doses and concentrations were collected at DAA initiation and cessation and at the time of sustained virologic response assessment at 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR12); these time points were matched in the NAT− control group. The primary outcome was difference in concentration-to-dose ratio (C/D) change (ΔC/D) over time between NAT+ and NAT− organ recipients.

Results: At DAA initiation, NAT+ organ recipients required a lower tacrolimus dose to reach goal than NAT− organ recipients (ΔC/D NAT+ = −0.41, ΔC/D NAT− 0.60, p = 0.01); however, a known tacrolimus interaction with fluconazole—administered to liver transplant recipients at high risk for invasive fungal infection (IFI)—represents a significant confounding factor. No differences in average C/D ratio between NAT+ and NAT− organ recipients were identified at any time point.

Conclusion: These results do not support empiric dose adjustments based on donor HCV NAT status or antiviral therapy.

直接抗病毒治疗对丙型肝炎病毒核酸检测阳性移植受者他克莫司药代动力学的影响
目的:sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL)和glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB)等丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)对HCV感染器官受者有效。该项目的目的是确定他克莫司药代动力学在DAA治疗期间对来自核酸检测阳性(NAT+)供体的腹部移植受者的变化。方法:纳入2019年4月22日至2022年6月23日期间移植的成人肾或肝移植受者。HCV NAT+器官受者根据机构方案和保险偏好接受DAAs治疗。从符合公共卫生服务(PHS) HCV传播风险标准的供体获得HCV NAT -器官的接受者被纳入比较组。在DAA开始和停止以及治疗结束后12周持续病毒学反应评估时(SVR12)收集他克莫司剂量和浓度;在NAT -对照组中,这些时间点都匹配。主要终点是NAT+和NAT -器官受体之间浓度剂量比(C/D)随时间变化的差异(ΔC/D)。结果:在DAA开始时,NAT+器官受体比NAT -器官受体需要更低的他克莫司剂量达到目标(ΔC/D NAT+ = - 0.41, ΔC/D NAT - 0.60, p = 0.01);然而,已知的他克莫司与氟康唑的相互作用——给予侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)高风险的肝移植受者——是一个重要的混淆因素。在任何时间点,NAT+和NAT -器官受体之间的平均C/D比率均无差异。结论:这些结果不支持根据供体HCV NAT状态或抗病毒治疗来调整剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics provides a forum for clinicians, pharmacists and pharmacologists to explore and report on issues of common interest. Reports and commentaries on current issues in medical and pharmaceutical practice are encouraged. Papers on evidence-based clinical practice and multidisciplinary collaborative work are particularly welcome. Regular sections in the journal include: editorials, commentaries, reviews (including systematic overviews and meta-analyses), original research and reports, and book reviews. Its scope embraces all aspects of clinical drug development and therapeutics, including: Rational therapeutics Evidence-based practice Safety, cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of drugs Drug interactions Clinical impact of drug formulations Pharmacogenetics Personalised, stratified and translational medicine Clinical pharmacokinetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信