Left ventricular longitudinal function is reduced but partially compensated by increased radial function after heart transplantation

Grunde Gjesdal MD PhD , Anna Székely MD , Henrik Engblom MD PhD , Håkan Arheden MD PhD , Oscar Ö Braun MD PhD , Katarina Steding-Ehrenborg RPT PhD
{"title":"Left ventricular longitudinal function is reduced but partially compensated by increased radial function after heart transplantation","authors":"Grunde Gjesdal MD PhD ,&nbsp;Anna Székely MD ,&nbsp;Henrik Engblom MD PhD ,&nbsp;Håkan Arheden MD PhD ,&nbsp;Oscar Ö Braun MD PhD ,&nbsp;Katarina Steding-Ehrenborg RPT PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In healthy hearts, left ventricular atrioventricular plane displacement (LVAVPD) measured by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) contributes to ∼60% of stroke volume. LVAVPD has been shown to correlate with maximal cardiac output and exercise capacity and is an independent predictor of outcomes in patients with heart failure. We aimed to assess if longitudinal pumping is altered, if LVAVPD is associated with exercise capacity, and if any difference in longitudinal pumping could be explained by the presence of a right bundle branch block (RBBB) in heart-transplanted patients.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This single-center study included 34 heart-transplanted patients who had undergone CMR and a cardiopulmonary exercise test as part of a clinical post-transplant surveillance program. Data was compared to 34 healthy sex- and age-matched controls.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Heart-transplanted patients had decreased LVAVPD (10.3 vs 13.7 mm, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), lower longitudinal contribution (46% vs 53%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), and lower septal contribution (−3% vs 8%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) to stroke volume compared to controls. Furthermore, the lateral contribution was increased (44% vs 28%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) in the heart-transplanted patients. Longitudinal contribution to stroke volume was neither associated with exercise capacity (<em>p</em> = 0.20) nor cardiac output at rest (<em>p</em> = 0.62). There was no difference in LVAVPD in patients with and without RBBB (<em>p</em> = 0.81).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Heart-transplanted patients have decreased left ventricular longitudinal function compared to healthy controls, in part compensated by an augmented lateral function. Longitudinal function is not associated with cardiac output at rest or exercise capacity in this patient group. Whether the altered pumping mechanics seen are associated with outcome remains to be investigated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100741,"journal":{"name":"JHLT Open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHLT Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295013342500103X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In healthy hearts, left ventricular atrioventricular plane displacement (LVAVPD) measured by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) contributes to ∼60% of stroke volume. LVAVPD has been shown to correlate with maximal cardiac output and exercise capacity and is an independent predictor of outcomes in patients with heart failure. We aimed to assess if longitudinal pumping is altered, if LVAVPD is associated with exercise capacity, and if any difference in longitudinal pumping could be explained by the presence of a right bundle branch block (RBBB) in heart-transplanted patients.

Method

This single-center study included 34 heart-transplanted patients who had undergone CMR and a cardiopulmonary exercise test as part of a clinical post-transplant surveillance program. Data was compared to 34 healthy sex- and age-matched controls.

Results

Heart-transplanted patients had decreased LVAVPD (10.3 vs 13.7 mm, p < 0.01), lower longitudinal contribution (46% vs 53%, p < 0.01), and lower septal contribution (−3% vs 8%, p < 0.01) to stroke volume compared to controls. Furthermore, the lateral contribution was increased (44% vs 28%, p < 0.01) in the heart-transplanted patients. Longitudinal contribution to stroke volume was neither associated with exercise capacity (p = 0.20) nor cardiac output at rest (p = 0.62). There was no difference in LVAVPD in patients with and without RBBB (p = 0.81).

Conclusion

Heart-transplanted patients have decreased left ventricular longitudinal function compared to healthy controls, in part compensated by an augmented lateral function. Longitudinal function is not associated with cardiac output at rest or exercise capacity in this patient group. Whether the altered pumping mechanics seen are associated with outcome remains to be investigated.
心脏移植后左心室纵向功能降低,但部分补偿径向功能的增加
在健康心脏中,通过心脏磁共振(CMR)测量的左室房室平面位移(LVAVPD)占脑卒中容积的约60%。LVAVPD已被证明与最大心输出量和运动能力相关,是心力衰竭患者预后的独立预测指标。我们的目的是评估纵向泵送是否改变,LVAVPD是否与运动能力有关,以及心脏移植患者纵向泵送的任何差异是否可以通过右束分支阻滞(RBBB)的存在来解释。方法本单中心研究纳入34例心脏移植患者,这些患者接受了CMR和心肺运动试验,作为临床移植后监测计划的一部分。将数据与34名性别和年龄匹配的健康对照组进行比较。结果移植患者LVAVPD降低(10.3 vs 13.7 mm, p <;0.01),纵向贡献较低(46% vs 53%, p <;0.01),下间隔贡献(- 3% vs 8%, p <;与对照组相比,0.01)。此外,横向贡献也有所增加(44% vs 28%, p <;0.01)。纵向对卒中容量的贡献与运动能力(p = 0.20)和静息时心输出量(p = 0.62)无关。有无RBBB的患者LVAVPD无差异(p = 0.81)。结论:与健康对照相比,心脏移植患者左心室纵向功能下降,部分由侧侧功能增强补偿。在这组患者中,纵向功能与静息时心输出量或运动能力无关。所观察到的泵送机制的改变是否与结果相关仍有待研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信