The role of human factors in the decision to administer general anaesthesia for emergency caesarean deliveries: a qualitative interview study of anaesthesia trainees in Ireland

Abstract

Background

Neuraxial anaesthesia is generally preferred over general anaesthesia (GA) for emergency caesarean deliveries (CD) due to its benefits for both mother and baby. While GA is sometimes required and unavoidable, it may also be performed unnecessarily in some cases. This study aimed to explore how trainee anaesthetists make the decision to administer GA for emergency caesarean delivery and more specifically how human factors may influence this decision-making process.

Methods

Following ethical approval, we conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with trainee anaesthetists, who recounted recent cases where GA was administered for emergency CD. The Critical Decision Method and Human Factors Interview Protocol were used to analyse key decision-making influences. Content analysis was performed independently by two investigators.

Results

Results showed that decision to administer GA was significantly influenced by fetal wellbeing, the patient’s perspective, time constraints, communication approaches, as well as prior experience and the organisational structure. Barriers to effective decision-making included poor communication and team dynamics, time pressure, limited experience in similar cases and organisational structure. Conversely, enablers of effective decision-making included senior staff presence and continuous interdisciplinary communication.

Conclusion

These findings highlight the significant role of human factors in the decision to administer GA for emergency CD. Key areas for improvement identified in our institution include interdisciplinary communication and the language used to convey urgency, which may enhance decision-making and reduce unnecessary GA use.