Evaluation of the precision and accuracy of augmented reality for pedicle screw placement in the cervical spine

Q3 Medicine
Lisa M. Tamburini MD, Anthony Viola III DO, Rohan R. Patel BS, Tomer Korabelnikov BS, Raghunandan Nayak BS, Justin S King BS, Scott Mallozzi MD, Isaac L. Moss MD, Hardeep Singh MD
{"title":"Evaluation of the precision and accuracy of augmented reality for pedicle screw placement in the cervical spine","authors":"Lisa M. Tamburini MD,&nbsp;Anthony Viola III DO,&nbsp;Rohan R. Patel BS,&nbsp;Tomer Korabelnikov BS,&nbsp;Raghunandan Nayak BS,&nbsp;Justin S King BS,&nbsp;Scott Mallozzi MD,&nbsp;Isaac L. Moss MD,&nbsp;Hardeep Singh MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Augmented reality (AR) has gained popularity in spine surgery. Head mounted AR devices superimpose a 3D reconstructed model on patient anatomy which has been shown to assist with accurate placement of lumbar spine pedicle screws. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of AR in cervical spine pedicle screw placement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Seven fresh-frozen cadaveric C2-T1 specimens were used. Computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained and uploaded to the AR navigation system. Fiducial markers were utilized to ensure accurate registration. Bilateral C2-C7 pedicle screws were placed. Images containing planned trajectory with tap and navigated screw placement were captured. A post-navigation CT scan was obtained. Time from initial CT scan to navigation and total navigation time were recorded. Radiation dose information was obtained. Linear and angular differences between planned trajectory and navigated screw position as well as navigated screw position and actual screw position were measured on axial and sagittal images. Screw position was graded using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>82 pedicle screws were placed. The mean angular and linear deviation between the tap trajectory and navigated screw position were 2.63 ± 2.65° and 3.08 ± 2.32° and 1.11 ± 1.04 mm and 1.24 ± 0.84 mm in the axial and sagittal planes. The mean angular and linear deviation between navigated screw and actual screw were 3.68 ± 4.15° and 2.44 ± 2.17° and 1.51 ± 1.53 mm and 1.02 mm ± 0.88 in the axial and sagittal planes. 95% of screws were given a grade of A or B. Average time from CT scan to navigation was 139.4 seconds and average navigation time was 33 minutes and 46 seconds. Average radiation exposure time was 12.76 ± 1.57 seconds and the average dose-length product (DLP) was 551.15 ± 74.04 mGy-cm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AR can assist in accurate placement of pedicle screws in the cervical spine. Deviation from navigated screw position to actual screw position was within clinically acceptable range throughout the cervical spine.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100618"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548425000381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Augmented reality (AR) has gained popularity in spine surgery. Head mounted AR devices superimpose a 3D reconstructed model on patient anatomy which has been shown to assist with accurate placement of lumbar spine pedicle screws. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of AR in cervical spine pedicle screw placement.

Methods

Seven fresh-frozen cadaveric C2-T1 specimens were used. Computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained and uploaded to the AR navigation system. Fiducial markers were utilized to ensure accurate registration. Bilateral C2-C7 pedicle screws were placed. Images containing planned trajectory with tap and navigated screw placement were captured. A post-navigation CT scan was obtained. Time from initial CT scan to navigation and total navigation time were recorded. Radiation dose information was obtained. Linear and angular differences between planned trajectory and navigated screw position as well as navigated screw position and actual screw position were measured on axial and sagittal images. Screw position was graded using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification.

Results

82 pedicle screws were placed. The mean angular and linear deviation between the tap trajectory and navigated screw position were 2.63 ± 2.65° and 3.08 ± 2.32° and 1.11 ± 1.04 mm and 1.24 ± 0.84 mm in the axial and sagittal planes. The mean angular and linear deviation between navigated screw and actual screw were 3.68 ± 4.15° and 2.44 ± 2.17° and 1.51 ± 1.53 mm and 1.02 mm ± 0.88 in the axial and sagittal planes. 95% of screws were given a grade of A or B. Average time from CT scan to navigation was 139.4 seconds and average navigation time was 33 minutes and 46 seconds. Average radiation exposure time was 12.76 ± 1.57 seconds and the average dose-length product (DLP) was 551.15 ± 74.04 mGy-cm.

Conclusions

AR can assist in accurate placement of pedicle screws in the cervical spine. Deviation from navigated screw position to actual screw position was within clinically acceptable range throughout the cervical spine.
增强现实技术在颈椎椎弓根螺钉置入中的精确性和准确性评估
增强现实技术(AR)在脊柱外科中越来越受欢迎。头戴式AR设备将3D重建模型叠加在患者解剖结构上,这有助于准确放置腰椎椎弓根螺钉。我们的目的是评估AR在颈椎椎弓根螺钉置入中的准确性和精密度。方法采用新鲜冷冻尸体C2-T1标本7份。获得计算机断层扫描(CT)并将其上传到AR导航系统。使用基准标记确保准确注册。放置双侧C2-C7椎弓根螺钉。图像包含规划轨迹与丝锥和导航螺钉放置。行导航后CT扫描。记录CT初扫到导航的时间和总导航时间。获得辐射剂量信息。在轴向和矢状面图像上测量计划轨迹与导航螺钉位置、导航螺钉位置与实际螺钉位置的直线和角度差异。采用Gertzbein-Robbins分类对螺钉位置进行分级。结果共植入椎弓根螺钉82枚。在轴向面和矢状面,丝锥轨迹与导航螺钉位置的平均角度和直线偏差分别为2.63±2.65°和3.08±2.32°,1.11±1.04 mm和1.24±0.84 mm。在轴位和矢状面,导航螺钉与实际螺钉的平均角度和直线偏差分别为3.68±4.15°和2.44±2.17°,1.51±1.53 mm和1.02 mm±0.88。95%的螺钉评分为a或b级,CT扫描至导航平均时间139.4秒,平均导航时间33分46秒。平均辐射暴露时间为12.76±1.57秒,平均剂量长度积(DLP)为551.15±74.04 mGy-cm。结论sar可辅助颈椎椎弓根螺钉的准确定位。从导航螺钉位置到实际螺钉位置的偏差在整个颈椎的临床可接受范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信