Patients’ experiences of community care after ambulance assessment: A scoping review’

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Pepita Bowling , Gideon de Jong
{"title":"Patients’ experiences of community care after ambulance assessment: A scoping review’","authors":"Pepita Bowling ,&nbsp;Gideon de Jong","doi":"10.1016/j.ienj.2025.101635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The changing role of ambulance clinicians has come with a focus on providing tailored care to patients within the community, thus preventing the need for transport to an emergency department.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The aim of this scoping review was to identify and analyse patient experiences of receiving community care following ambulance assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scoping literature review was conducted guided by the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. Four electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE, CINAHL, ProQuest, and Scopus. Thematic analysis was used for exploring key codes, themes, and sub-themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The search led to an initial list of 930 articles of which ultimately 10 were selected for narrative analysis. Three key themes and eight subthemes were identified. First, the perceived benefits of community ambulance care which according to participants improved: health status and literacy; created a safety net; and provided holistic care. Second, ambulance professionals that were regarded as excellent clinicians due to: their interpersonal and communication skills; the importance they put on building rapport; and their ability to provide reassurance for vulnerable patients. Finally, participants preferred to be treated within the community instead of the hospital as such treatment provided: timely and accessible care in the home environment; and is better aligned with the principles of patient and family-centred care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The patient-clinician bond allows for a trusting and collaborative relationship in ambulance services with both patients and family, as a unit of care, resulting in a more personalised, and functional approach to care provision.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48914,"journal":{"name":"International Emergency Nursing","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101635"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X25000655","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The changing role of ambulance clinicians has come with a focus on providing tailored care to patients within the community, thus preventing the need for transport to an emergency department.

Aim

The aim of this scoping review was to identify and analyse patient experiences of receiving community care following ambulance assessment.

Methods

A scoping literature review was conducted guided by the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. Four electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE, CINAHL, ProQuest, and Scopus. Thematic analysis was used for exploring key codes, themes, and sub-themes.

Results

The search led to an initial list of 930 articles of which ultimately 10 were selected for narrative analysis. Three key themes and eight subthemes were identified. First, the perceived benefits of community ambulance care which according to participants improved: health status and literacy; created a safety net; and provided holistic care. Second, ambulance professionals that were regarded as excellent clinicians due to: their interpersonal and communication skills; the importance they put on building rapport; and their ability to provide reassurance for vulnerable patients. Finally, participants preferred to be treated within the community instead of the hospital as such treatment provided: timely and accessible care in the home environment; and is better aligned with the principles of patient and family-centred care.

Conclusion

The patient-clinician bond allows for a trusting and collaborative relationship in ambulance services with both patients and family, as a unit of care, resulting in a more personalised, and functional approach to care provision.
救护车评估后患者的社区护理体验:范围审查
引言救护车临床医生的角色变化是随着为社区内的患者提供量身定制的护理而来的,从而避免了将患者送往急诊室的需要。目的本综述的目的是识别和分析患者在救护车评估后接受社区护理的经历。方法采用PRISMA文献综述扩展版进行文献综述。检索四个电子数据库:MEDLINE、CINAHL、ProQuest和Scopus。主题分析用于探索关键代码、主题和子主题。搜索产生了930篇文章的初始列表,其中10篇最终被选中进行叙事分析。确定了三个关键主题和八个次级主题。首先,社区救护车护理的感知效益,根据参与者改善:健康状况和识字;建立安全网;并提供全面的护理。第二,救护车专业人员被认为是优秀的临床医生,因为:他们的人际关系和沟通能力;他们对建立融洽关系的重视;以及他们为脆弱的病人提供安慰的能力。最后,参与者更愿意在社区而不是医院接受治疗,因为这样的治疗提供:及时和可获得的护理在家庭环境中;并且更符合以病人和家庭为中心的护理原则。患者与临床医生之间的纽带使得救护车服务与患者和家属之间建立了信任和合作关系,作为一个护理单位,从而产生了更加个性化和功能性的护理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: International Emergency Nursing is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nurses and other professionals involved in emergency care. It aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high quality research findings, specialist knowledge and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. With an international readership and authorship, it provides a platform for practitioners worldwide to communicate and enhance the evidence-base of emergency care. The journal publishes a broad range of papers, from personal reflection to primary research findings, created by first-time through to reputable authors from a number of disciplines. It brings together research from practice, education, theory, and operational management, relevant to all levels of staff working in emergency care settings worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信