Multimodal deep learning for predicting unsuccessful recanalization in refractory large vessel occlusion

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jesús D. González , Pere Canals , Marc Rodrigo-Gisbert , Jordi Mayol , Alvaro García-Tornel , Marc Ribó
{"title":"Multimodal deep learning for predicting unsuccessful recanalization in refractory large vessel occlusion","authors":"Jesús D. González ,&nbsp;Pere Canals ,&nbsp;Marc Rodrigo-Gisbert ,&nbsp;Jordi Mayol ,&nbsp;Alvaro García-Tornel ,&nbsp;Marc Ribó","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><strong><em>Purpose:</em></strong> This study explores a multi-modal deep learning approach that integrates pre-intervention neuroimaging and clinical data to predict endovascular therapy (EVT) outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients. To this end, consecutive stroke patients undergoing EVT were included in the study, including patients with suspected Intracranial Atherosclerosis-related Large Vessel Occlusion ICAD-LVO and other refractory occlusions. <strong><em>Methods:</em></strong> A retrospective, single-center cohort of patients with anterior circulation LVO who underwent EVT between 2017–2023 was analyzed. Refractory LVO (rLVO) defined class, comprised patients who presented any of the following: final angiographic stenosis &gt; 50 %, unsuccessful recanalization (eTICI 0-2a) or required rescue treatments (angioplasty +/- stenting). Neuroimaging data included non-contrast CT and CTA volumes, automated vascular segmentation, and CT perfusion parameters. Clinical data included demographics, comorbidities and stroke severity. Imaging features were encoded using convolutional neural networks and fused with clinical data using a DAFT module. Data were split 80 % for training (with four-fold cross-validation) and 20 % for testing. Explainability methods were used to analyze the contribution of clinical variables and regions of interest in the images. <strong><em>Results:</em></strong> The final sample comprised 599 patients; 481 for training the model (77, 16.0 % rLVO), and 118 for testing (16, 13.6 % rLVO). The best model predicting rLVO using just imaging achieved an AUC of 0.53 ± 0.02 and F1 of 0.19 ± 0.05 while the proposed multimodal model achieved an AUC of 0.70 ± 0.02 and F1 of 0.39 ± 0.02 in testing. <strong><em>Conclusion:</em></strong> Combining vascular segmentation, clinical variables, and imaging data improved prediction performance over single-source models. This approach offers an early alert to procedural complexity, potentially guiding more tailored, timely intervention strategies in the EVT workflow.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 112254"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25003407","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores a multi-modal deep learning approach that integrates pre-intervention neuroimaging and clinical data to predict endovascular therapy (EVT) outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients. To this end, consecutive stroke patients undergoing EVT were included in the study, including patients with suspected Intracranial Atherosclerosis-related Large Vessel Occlusion ICAD-LVO and other refractory occlusions. Methods: A retrospective, single-center cohort of patients with anterior circulation LVO who underwent EVT between 2017–2023 was analyzed. Refractory LVO (rLVO) defined class, comprised patients who presented any of the following: final angiographic stenosis > 50 %, unsuccessful recanalization (eTICI 0-2a) or required rescue treatments (angioplasty +/- stenting). Neuroimaging data included non-contrast CT and CTA volumes, automated vascular segmentation, and CT perfusion parameters. Clinical data included demographics, comorbidities and stroke severity. Imaging features were encoded using convolutional neural networks and fused with clinical data using a DAFT module. Data were split 80 % for training (with four-fold cross-validation) and 20 % for testing. Explainability methods were used to analyze the contribution of clinical variables and regions of interest in the images. Results: The final sample comprised 599 patients; 481 for training the model (77, 16.0 % rLVO), and 118 for testing (16, 13.6 % rLVO). The best model predicting rLVO using just imaging achieved an AUC of 0.53 ± 0.02 and F1 of 0.19 ± 0.05 while the proposed multimodal model achieved an AUC of 0.70 ± 0.02 and F1 of 0.39 ± 0.02 in testing. Conclusion: Combining vascular segmentation, clinical variables, and imaging data improved prediction performance over single-source models. This approach offers an early alert to procedural complexity, potentially guiding more tailored, timely intervention strategies in the EVT workflow.
多模态深度学习预测难治性大血管闭塞再通失败
目的:本研究探索一种多模式深度学习方法,结合干预前神经影像学和临床数据来预测急性缺血性脑卒中患者血管内治疗(EVT)的结果。为此,研究纳入了连续行EVT的脑卒中患者,包括疑似颅内动脉粥样硬化相关性大血管闭塞ICAD-LVO患者和其他难治性闭塞患者。方法:回顾性分析2017-2023年间接受EVT的前循环LVO患者的单中心队列。难治性LVO (rLVO)定义类别,包括出现以下任何一种情况的患者:最终血管造影狭窄;50%,再通失败(eTICI 0-2a)或需要抢救治疗(血管成形术+/-支架置入术)。神经影像学数据包括非对比CT和CTA体积、自动血管分割和CT灌注参数。临床数据包括人口统计学、合并症和中风严重程度。成像特征使用卷积神经网络编码,并使用DAFT模块与临床数据融合。数据分割80%用于训练(四倍交叉验证),20%用于测试。可解释性方法用于分析临床变量和图像中感兴趣的区域的贡献。结果:最终样本包括599例患者;481用于训练模型(77,16.0% rLVO), 118用于测试(16,13.6% rLVO)。单纯成像预测rLVO的最佳模型AUC为0.53±0.02,F1为0.19±0.05,多模态模型AUC为0.70±0.02,F1为0.39±0.02。结论:与单一来源模型相比,结合血管分割、临床变量和影像学数据可提高预测效果。这种方法提供了对程序复杂性的早期预警,有可能指导EVT工作流程中更有针对性、更及时的干预策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信