“It Changed Continuously, and I Don’t Know When”: Thai Preservice Biology Teachers’ Orientations to Teaching Science

IF 3.1 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Luecha Ladachart, Ladapa Ladachart
{"title":"“It Changed Continuously, and I Don’t Know When”: Thai Preservice Biology Teachers’ Orientations to Teaching Science","authors":"Luecha Ladachart, Ladapa Ladachart","doi":"10.1177/00224871251344913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research examines changes in orientations to teaching science among 37 preservice biology teachers, who primarily intend to work in secondary education, during a 5-year program of science teacher education in Thailand. Data were collected twice, in the first and fourth years of the program, using the same Pedagogy of Science Teaching Test, in which participants quantitatively chose their preferred approaches to instruction, while qualitatively providing the reasons for choosing these instructional approaches in a written format. Quantitative data were analyzed using inferential statistics, whereas qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. The results indicate that participants’ orientations toward inquiry-based instruction improved, primarily due to their understanding of the nature of students’ learning. This result supports the idea that conceptions relating to students’ learning are critical in shaping orientations toward teaching science. Experiences that reinforced inquiry-based orientations to teaching science are discussed based on follow-up interviews with the five participants with the highest improvements.","PeriodicalId":17162,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teacher Education","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871251344913","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research examines changes in orientations to teaching science among 37 preservice biology teachers, who primarily intend to work in secondary education, during a 5-year program of science teacher education in Thailand. Data were collected twice, in the first and fourth years of the program, using the same Pedagogy of Science Teaching Test, in which participants quantitatively chose their preferred approaches to instruction, while qualitatively providing the reasons for choosing these instructional approaches in a written format. Quantitative data were analyzed using inferential statistics, whereas qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. The results indicate that participants’ orientations toward inquiry-based instruction improved, primarily due to their understanding of the nature of students’ learning. This result supports the idea that conceptions relating to students’ learning are critical in shaping orientations toward teaching science. Experiences that reinforced inquiry-based orientations to teaching science are discussed based on follow-up interviews with the five participants with the highest improvements.
“不断变化,不知何时”:泰国职前生物教师的科学教学取向
本研究考察了在泰国为期5年的科学教师教育计划中,37名主要打算在中学教育工作的职前生物教师的科学教学取向的变化。数据收集了两次,在项目的第一年和第四年,使用相同的科学教学法教学测试,参与者定量地选择他们喜欢的教学方法,同时定性地以书面形式提供选择这些教学方法的原因。定量数据采用推理统计分析,定性数据采用内容分析分析。研究结果显示,参与者对探究性教学的倾向有所改善,这主要是由于他们对学生学习本质的理解。这一结果支持了这样一种观点,即与学生学习有关的概念在形成科学教学方向方面至关重要。基于对五位进步最大的参与者的后续访谈,我们讨论了在科学教学中加强探究性导向的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Teacher Education
Journal of Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Teacher Education, the flagship journal of AACTE, is to serve as a research forum for a diverse group of scholars who are invested in the preparation and continued support of teachers and who can have a significant voice in discussions and decision-making around issues of teacher education. One of the fundamental goals of the journal is the use of evidence from rigorous investigation to identify and address the increasingly complex issues confronting teacher education at the national and global levels. These issues include but are not limited to preparing teachers to effectively address the needs of marginalized youth, their families and communities; program design and impact; selection, recruitment and retention of teachers from underrepresented groups; local and national policy; accountability; and routes to certification. JTE does not publish book reviews, program evaluations or articles solely describing programs, program components, courses or personal experiences. In addition, JTE does not accept manuscripts that are solely about the development or validation of an instrument unless the use of that instrument yields data providing new insights into issues of relevance to teacher education (MSU, February 2016).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信