A Scoping Review of Quantitative Assessments of Women's Bladder Health Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs.

Journal of women's health (2002) Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-18 DOI:10.1089/jwh.2024.0997
D Yvette LaCoursiere, Shayna D Cunningham, Camille P Vaughan, Lisa Kane Low, Haitao Chu, Alayne D Markland, Diane K Newman, Sheila Gahagan, Jean F Wyman
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Quantitative Assessments of Women's Bladder Health Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs.","authors":"D Yvette LaCoursiere, Shayna D Cunningham, Camille P Vaughan, Lisa Kane Low, Haitao Chu, Alayne D Markland, Diane K Newman, Sheila Gahagan, Jean F Wyman","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> To determine the need for an instrument to measure knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs (KAB) regarding bladder health for use in a population-based study of community-dwelling women, we performed a scoping review of the extant literature focusing on studies utilizing survey methodology to characterize bladder health KAB. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To synthesize quantitative studies on women's KAB regarding bladder health and characterize their survey instruments. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A systematic search in Ovid Medline was conducted for articles published from January 1990 through April 2024. We included quantitative studies that used questionnaires to assess adolescent and adult women's bladder health KAB. Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were screened, followed by data extraction of key study elements, questionnaire items, and quality. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We identified 83 articles across seven topic areas. Studies were conducted in 26 countries in clinically (52%) and community-based (47%) settings. The majority (74%) used cross-sectional designs. Most studies used investigator-designed instruments (<i>n</i> = 36), the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (<i>n</i> = 20), Urinary Incontinence Quiz (<i>n</i> = 6), Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice (<i>n</i> = 5), and the Urinary Incontinence Knowledge Scale (<i>n</i> = 4). The 33,444 respondents generally had limited knowledge of urinary incontinence. Although awareness of pelvic floor muscle exercises was high, respondents often could not articulate performance or indications. Few studies assessed bladder health and function, and there were limited data on attitudes and beliefs. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> There is some evidence regarding women's knowledge of bladder and pelvic floor dysfunctions, particularly urinary incontinence, but less is known about women's knowledge of other bladder health topics. Even fewer data exist on bladder health attitudes and beliefs. Survey instruments that comprehensively assess bladder health are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":520699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health (2002)","volume":" ","pages":"1099-1124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health (2002)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To determine the need for an instrument to measure knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs (KAB) regarding bladder health for use in a population-based study of community-dwelling women, we performed a scoping review of the extant literature focusing on studies utilizing survey methodology to characterize bladder health KAB. Objectives: To synthesize quantitative studies on women's KAB regarding bladder health and characterize their survey instruments. Methods: A systematic search in Ovid Medline was conducted for articles published from January 1990 through April 2024. We included quantitative studies that used questionnaires to assess adolescent and adult women's bladder health KAB. Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were screened, followed by data extraction of key study elements, questionnaire items, and quality. Results: We identified 83 articles across seven topic areas. Studies were conducted in 26 countries in clinically (52%) and community-based (47%) settings. The majority (74%) used cross-sectional designs. Most studies used investigator-designed instruments (n = 36), the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (n = 20), Urinary Incontinence Quiz (n = 6), Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice (n = 5), and the Urinary Incontinence Knowledge Scale (n = 4). The 33,444 respondents generally had limited knowledge of urinary incontinence. Although awareness of pelvic floor muscle exercises was high, respondents often could not articulate performance or indications. Few studies assessed bladder health and function, and there were limited data on attitudes and beliefs. Conclusions: There is some evidence regarding women's knowledge of bladder and pelvic floor dysfunctions, particularly urinary incontinence, but less is known about women's knowledge of other bladder health topics. Even fewer data exist on bladder health attitudes and beliefs. Survey instruments that comprehensively assess bladder health are needed.

女性膀胱健康知识、态度和信念定量评估的范围综述。
背景:为了确定是否需要一种工具来测量关于膀胱健康的知识、态度和信念(KAB),以便在基于人群的社区居住女性研究中使用,我们对现有文献进行了范围审查,重点是利用调查方法表征膀胱健康KAB的研究。目的:对女性膀胱健康KAB的定量研究进行综合,并对其调查工具进行定性。方法:系统检索Ovid Medline网站1990年1月至2024年4月发表的文章。我们纳入了定量研究,使用问卷来评估青少年和成年女性的膀胱健康KAB。筛选标题、摘要和全文文章,然后提取关键研究要素、问卷项目和质量数据。结果:我们确定了7个主题领域的83篇文章。研究在26个国家的临床(52%)和社区(47%)环境中进行。大多数(74%)采用横断面设计。大多数研究使用研究者设计的仪器(n = 36)、脱垂和尿失禁知识问卷(n = 20)、尿失禁测试(n = 6)、知识、态度和实践(n = 5)和尿失禁知识量表(n = 4)。33,444名受访者普遍对尿失禁的知识有限。虽然对盆底肌肉锻炼的认识很高,但受访者往往不能清楚地表达其表现或指征。很少有研究评估膀胱健康和功能,关于态度和信念的数据也有限。结论:有一些证据表明女性对膀胱和盆底功能障碍,特别是尿失禁的了解,但对女性对其他膀胱健康问题的了解较少。关于膀胱健康态度和信念的数据就更少了。需要全面评估膀胱健康的调查仪器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信