COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Hesitancy: Perceptions in Kerala, the Indian State With the Highest Literacy.

Dhanya Muralidharan, Arun Paul, Suhaila Panangadanakath, Sreelakshmi Nandakumar, Shana Poothotill, Rahila MoiduKunhi, Zainul Ameen
{"title":"COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Hesitancy: Perceptions in Kerala, the Indian State With the Highest Literacy.","authors":"Dhanya Muralidharan, Arun Paul, Suhaila Panangadanakath, Sreelakshmi Nandakumar, Shana Poothotill, Rahila MoiduKunhi, Zainul Ameen","doi":"10.3961/jpmph.25.137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Public acceptance of a vaccine determines whether pandemic control is successful. Most studies assessing COVID-19 vaccine acceptance were conducted before the vaccine became publicly available, whereas the actual intent to be vaccinated often differs once the vaccine is accessible. Therefore, this study investigated COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and associated determinants among the general population of Kerala, India, after the vaccine became available.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional descriptive online survey was conducted using a structured and validated questionnaire in both English and Malayalam. It collected information on contextual influences, individual perceptions, group influences, COVID-19 vaccine-specific factors, and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1078 participants, 85% (n=916) accepted the COVID-19 vaccine, while 15% (n=162) were hesitant. Factors predicting vaccine hesitancy included male gender, younger age, lower educational attainment (school level), lower income, being unmarried, and not having children. Key determinants of vaccine hesitancy identified were concerns regarding vaccine safety and effectiveness, lack of trust in the government, insufficient information provided through the vaccination program, disbelief in vaccination's protective role against COVID-19, and perception of the vaccination process as complicated and inconvenient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vaccine-hesitant individuals do not perceive COVID-19 vaccination as a social responsibility to their community. Digitization of the vaccination process may not be suitable for all segments of society, indicating that additional support for persons from lower socioeconomic statuses may be necessary to enhance acceptance. The newly identified areas of concern can guide government and healthcare workers, both nationally and globally, in effectively addressing and mitigating vaccine hesitancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":520687,"journal":{"name":"Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.25.137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Public acceptance of a vaccine determines whether pandemic control is successful. Most studies assessing COVID-19 vaccine acceptance were conducted before the vaccine became publicly available, whereas the actual intent to be vaccinated often differs once the vaccine is accessible. Therefore, this study investigated COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and associated determinants among the general population of Kerala, India, after the vaccine became available.

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive online survey was conducted using a structured and validated questionnaire in both English and Malayalam. It collected information on contextual influences, individual perceptions, group influences, COVID-19 vaccine-specific factors, and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination.

Results: Of the 1078 participants, 85% (n=916) accepted the COVID-19 vaccine, while 15% (n=162) were hesitant. Factors predicting vaccine hesitancy included male gender, younger age, lower educational attainment (school level), lower income, being unmarried, and not having children. Key determinants of vaccine hesitancy identified were concerns regarding vaccine safety and effectiveness, lack of trust in the government, insufficient information provided through the vaccination program, disbelief in vaccination's protective role against COVID-19, and perception of the vaccination process as complicated and inconvenient.

Conclusions: Vaccine-hesitant individuals do not perceive COVID-19 vaccination as a social responsibility to their community. Digitization of the vaccination process may not be suitable for all segments of society, indicating that additional support for persons from lower socioeconomic statuses may be necessary to enhance acceptance. The newly identified areas of concern can guide government and healthcare workers, both nationally and globally, in effectively addressing and mitigating vaccine hesitancy.

COVID-19疫苗接受与犹豫:印度识字率最高的喀拉拉邦的看法
目标:公众对疫苗的接受程度决定了大流行控制是否成功。大多数评估COVID-19疫苗接受程度的研究是在疫苗公开可用之前进行的,而一旦疫苗可获得,接种疫苗的实际意图往往会有所不同。因此,本研究调查了印度喀拉拉邦普通人群在疫苗可用后对COVID-19疫苗的接受、犹豫和相关决定因素。方法:横断面描述性在线调查使用英语和马拉雅拉姆语进行结构化和有效的问卷调查。它收集了有关环境影响、个人看法、群体影响、COVID-19疫苗特异性因素以及对COVID-19疫苗接种的态度的信息。结果:在1078名参与者中,85% (n=916)接受了COVID-19疫苗,15% (n=162)犹豫不决。预测疫苗犹豫的因素包括男性、年龄较小、受教育程度(学校水平)较低、收入较低、未婚和没有孩子。确定的疫苗犹豫的主要决定因素是对疫苗安全性和有效性的担忧、对政府缺乏信任、通过疫苗接种计划提供的信息不足、不相信疫苗接种对COVID-19的保护作用,以及认为疫苗接种过程复杂和不方便。结论:疫苗犹豫者不认为COVID-19疫苗接种是对其社区的社会责任。疫苗接种过程的数字化可能并不适合社会所有阶层,这表明可能需要为社会经济地位较低的人提供额外支持,以提高接受度。新确定的关注领域可以指导国家和全球的政府和卫生保健工作者有效地处理和减轻疫苗犹豫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信