Implementing a 3D dynamic arm support within the workplace of medical laboratory technicians: A nonrandomized feasibility trial.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Frédérique Dupuis, Philippe Meidinger, Anthony Lachance, François Desmeules, Jessika Tremblay, Jean Titley, Jason Bouffard, Alexandre Campeau-Lecours, Jean-Sébastien Roy
{"title":"Implementing a 3D dynamic arm support within the workplace of medical laboratory technicians: A nonrandomized feasibility trial.","authors":"Frédérique Dupuis, Philippe Meidinger, Anthony Lachance, François Desmeules, Jessika Tremblay, Jean Titley, Jason Bouffard, Alexandre Campeau-Lecours, Jean-Sébastien Roy","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2025.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A three-dimensional dynamic arm support (3D-DAS) was designed in response to medical laboratory technicians' need for solutions to reduce the physical demands on the upper extremities during biomedical manipulations.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the feasibility of implementing the 3D-DAS in medical laboratory technicians' workplaces, evaluate the potential for conducting a larger randomized controlled trial, and explore the effects of the 3D-DAS on clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Nonrandomized feasibility study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hospitals employing medical laboratory technicians were recruited and assigned to either the experimental group (n=15; using the 3D-DAS for biomedical manipulations over 6months) or the control group (n=15; no intervention). Feasibility was assessed by examining compliance, acceptability, satisfaction with the 3D-DAS, and unintended effects. Semistructured interviews were also conducted. Clinical outcomes included the prevalence of work-related upper extremity disorders, symptoms intensity, functional limitations, and presenteeism. All outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3 and 6months. Descriptive data were presented for feasibility metrics, and generalized estimating equations were used to compare clinical outcomes between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feasibility was deemed very limited, with compliance rates at 16% at 3months and 6% at 6months. Acceptability and satisfaction with the device were also notably low. Three participants reported two unintended effects: increased physical demand at the elbow due to external resistance and skin irritation on the forearm. The 3D-DAS showed no impact on the prevalence of work-related upper extremity disorders, symptoms, disability, or presenteeism. However, participants indicated that the 3D-DAS was helpful in specific work situations, such as performing elevation tasks or when experiencing shoulder pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlighted significant barriers to implementing a 3D-DAS in the workplace of medical laboratory technicians. The findings underscore the importance of clearly defining the specific context in which the device is most beneficial before pursuing a larger study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2025.04.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A three-dimensional dynamic arm support (3D-DAS) was designed in response to medical laboratory technicians' need for solutions to reduce the physical demands on the upper extremities during biomedical manipulations.

Purpose: To assess the feasibility of implementing the 3D-DAS in medical laboratory technicians' workplaces, evaluate the potential for conducting a larger randomized controlled trial, and explore the effects of the 3D-DAS on clinical outcomes.

Study design: Nonrandomized feasibility study.

Methods: Two hospitals employing medical laboratory technicians were recruited and assigned to either the experimental group (n=15; using the 3D-DAS for biomedical manipulations over 6months) or the control group (n=15; no intervention). Feasibility was assessed by examining compliance, acceptability, satisfaction with the 3D-DAS, and unintended effects. Semistructured interviews were also conducted. Clinical outcomes included the prevalence of work-related upper extremity disorders, symptoms intensity, functional limitations, and presenteeism. All outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3 and 6months. Descriptive data were presented for feasibility metrics, and generalized estimating equations were used to compare clinical outcomes between groups.

Results: Feasibility was deemed very limited, with compliance rates at 16% at 3months and 6% at 6months. Acceptability and satisfaction with the device were also notably low. Three participants reported two unintended effects: increased physical demand at the elbow due to external resistance and skin irritation on the forearm. The 3D-DAS showed no impact on the prevalence of work-related upper extremity disorders, symptoms, disability, or presenteeism. However, participants indicated that the 3D-DAS was helpful in specific work situations, such as performing elevation tasks or when experiencing shoulder pain.

Conclusions: This study highlighted significant barriers to implementing a 3D-DAS in the workplace of medical laboratory technicians. The findings underscore the importance of clearly defining the specific context in which the device is most beneficial before pursuing a larger study.

在医学实验室技术人员的工作场所实施3D动态手臂支撑:一项非随机可行性试验。
背景:针对医学实验室技术人员在生物医学操作过程中对减少上肢体力需求的解决方案的需求,设计了三维动态臂支架(3D-DAS)。目的:评估3D-DAS在医学实验室技术人员工作场所实施的可行性,评估开展更大规模随机对照试验的潜力,并探讨3D-DAS对临床结果的影响。研究设计:非随机可行性研究。方法:招募两家聘用医学检验技术人员的医院,将其分为实验组(n=15;使用3D-DAS进行生物医学操作超过6个月)或对照组(n=15;不干预)。通过检查依从性、可接受性、对3D-DAS的满意度和意外效果来评估可行性。还进行了半结构化访谈。临床结果包括与工作相关的上肢疾病的患病率、症状强度、功能限制和出勤率。所有结果在基线、3个月和6个月进行评估。提供描述性数据作为可行性指标,并使用广义估计方程来比较组间临床结果。结果:可行性被认为非常有限,3个月的依从率为16%,6个月的依从率为6%。对该设备的接受度和满意度也很低。三名参与者报告了两种意想不到的效果:由于外部阻力和前臂皮肤刺激,肘部的体力需求增加。3D-DAS显示对与工作相关的上肢疾病、症状、残疾或出勤的患病率没有影响。然而,参与者表示,3D-DAS在特定的工作情况下是有帮助的,比如执行抬高任务或经历肩痛。结论:本研究强调了在医学实验室技术人员的工作场所实施3D-DAS的重大障碍。研究结果强调了在进行更大规模的研究之前,明确定义该设备最有益的特定环境的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信