Frédérique Dupuis, Philippe Meidinger, Anthony Lachance, François Desmeules, Jessika Tremblay, Jean Titley, Jason Bouffard, Alexandre Campeau-Lecours, Jean-Sébastien Roy
{"title":"Implementing a 3D dynamic arm support within the workplace of medical laboratory technicians: A nonrandomized feasibility trial.","authors":"Frédérique Dupuis, Philippe Meidinger, Anthony Lachance, François Desmeules, Jessika Tremblay, Jean Titley, Jason Bouffard, Alexandre Campeau-Lecours, Jean-Sébastien Roy","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2025.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A three-dimensional dynamic arm support (3D-DAS) was designed in response to medical laboratory technicians' need for solutions to reduce the physical demands on the upper extremities during biomedical manipulations.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the feasibility of implementing the 3D-DAS in medical laboratory technicians' workplaces, evaluate the potential for conducting a larger randomized controlled trial, and explore the effects of the 3D-DAS on clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Nonrandomized feasibility study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hospitals employing medical laboratory technicians were recruited and assigned to either the experimental group (n=15; using the 3D-DAS for biomedical manipulations over 6months) or the control group (n=15; no intervention). Feasibility was assessed by examining compliance, acceptability, satisfaction with the 3D-DAS, and unintended effects. Semistructured interviews were also conducted. Clinical outcomes included the prevalence of work-related upper extremity disorders, symptoms intensity, functional limitations, and presenteeism. All outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3 and 6months. Descriptive data were presented for feasibility metrics, and generalized estimating equations were used to compare clinical outcomes between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feasibility was deemed very limited, with compliance rates at 16% at 3months and 6% at 6months. Acceptability and satisfaction with the device were also notably low. Three participants reported two unintended effects: increased physical demand at the elbow due to external resistance and skin irritation on the forearm. The 3D-DAS showed no impact on the prevalence of work-related upper extremity disorders, symptoms, disability, or presenteeism. However, participants indicated that the 3D-DAS was helpful in specific work situations, such as performing elevation tasks or when experiencing shoulder pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlighted significant barriers to implementing a 3D-DAS in the workplace of medical laboratory technicians. The findings underscore the importance of clearly defining the specific context in which the device is most beneficial before pursuing a larger study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2025.04.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: A three-dimensional dynamic arm support (3D-DAS) was designed in response to medical laboratory technicians' need for solutions to reduce the physical demands on the upper extremities during biomedical manipulations.
Purpose: To assess the feasibility of implementing the 3D-DAS in medical laboratory technicians' workplaces, evaluate the potential for conducting a larger randomized controlled trial, and explore the effects of the 3D-DAS on clinical outcomes.
Study design: Nonrandomized feasibility study.
Methods: Two hospitals employing medical laboratory technicians were recruited and assigned to either the experimental group (n=15; using the 3D-DAS for biomedical manipulations over 6months) or the control group (n=15; no intervention). Feasibility was assessed by examining compliance, acceptability, satisfaction with the 3D-DAS, and unintended effects. Semistructured interviews were also conducted. Clinical outcomes included the prevalence of work-related upper extremity disorders, symptoms intensity, functional limitations, and presenteeism. All outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3 and 6months. Descriptive data were presented for feasibility metrics, and generalized estimating equations were used to compare clinical outcomes between groups.
Results: Feasibility was deemed very limited, with compliance rates at 16% at 3months and 6% at 6months. Acceptability and satisfaction with the device were also notably low. Three participants reported two unintended effects: increased physical demand at the elbow due to external resistance and skin irritation on the forearm. The 3D-DAS showed no impact on the prevalence of work-related upper extremity disorders, symptoms, disability, or presenteeism. However, participants indicated that the 3D-DAS was helpful in specific work situations, such as performing elevation tasks or when experiencing shoulder pain.
Conclusions: This study highlighted significant barriers to implementing a 3D-DAS in the workplace of medical laboratory technicians. The findings underscore the importance of clearly defining the specific context in which the device is most beneficial before pursuing a larger study.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.