Mental Health Providers' Attitudes, Norms, and Beliefs About Cultural Humility in Service Delivery.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alexandria G Bauer, Amudha Balaraman, Ayanna Gilmore
{"title":"Mental Health Providers' Attitudes, Norms, and Beliefs About Cultural Humility in Service Delivery.","authors":"Alexandria G Bauer, Amudha Balaraman, Ayanna Gilmore","doi":"10.1007/s11414-025-09953-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cultural humility is an important provider-level strategy for improving engagement and retention in mental health care. Yet, little research has used theoretical frameworks to examine beliefs and intentions to practice with cultural humility among mental health providers. The current study aimed to fill this gap by using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to qualitatively explore beliefs, norms, and attitudes regarding cultural humility practice among a sample of 16 professional mental health providers. Participants were predominately women (89.5%), with an average age of 38 years old (SD = 7.98). Participants completed a 30- to 60-min online interview. Thematic analysis was used to examine patterns and identify overarching themes within TPB constructs of behavioral, normative, and control beliefs. Themes within behavioral beliefs reflected improved practice, particularly for working with clients from marginalized groups. However, there was uncertainty in navigating cultural humility practice and concerns about potentially altering the client relationship. Referents for normative beliefs were clinical agencies, professional organizations, university training programs, and supervisors and mentors. Within control beliefs, themes for facilitators and barriers centered around lack of support from mental health systems, personal limitations and strengths, and professional development. This study furthers understanding of mental health providers' attitudes and intentions to practice with cultural humility, as well as underscoring the nuances of when and how these practices are used. This research can help to address barriers and promote cultural humility practice among mental health providers across multiple fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":49040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-025-09953-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cultural humility is an important provider-level strategy for improving engagement and retention in mental health care. Yet, little research has used theoretical frameworks to examine beliefs and intentions to practice with cultural humility among mental health providers. The current study aimed to fill this gap by using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to qualitatively explore beliefs, norms, and attitudes regarding cultural humility practice among a sample of 16 professional mental health providers. Participants were predominately women (89.5%), with an average age of 38 years old (SD = 7.98). Participants completed a 30- to 60-min online interview. Thematic analysis was used to examine patterns and identify overarching themes within TPB constructs of behavioral, normative, and control beliefs. Themes within behavioral beliefs reflected improved practice, particularly for working with clients from marginalized groups. However, there was uncertainty in navigating cultural humility practice and concerns about potentially altering the client relationship. Referents for normative beliefs were clinical agencies, professional organizations, university training programs, and supervisors and mentors. Within control beliefs, themes for facilitators and barriers centered around lack of support from mental health systems, personal limitations and strengths, and professional development. This study furthers understanding of mental health providers' attitudes and intentions to practice with cultural humility, as well as underscoring the nuances of when and how these practices are used. This research can help to address barriers and promote cultural humility practice among mental health providers across multiple fields.

心理健康服务提供者对服务提供中文化谦逊的态度、规范和信念。
文化谦逊是一种重要的提供者层面的战略,以提高精神卫生保健的参与和保留。然而,很少有研究使用理论框架来检验心理健康提供者在文化谦逊中实践的信念和意图。本研究旨在通过使用计划行为理论(TPB)来定性地探讨16名专业心理健康提供者关于文化谦逊实践的信念、规范和态度,从而填补这一空白。参与者主要是女性(89.5%),平均年龄为38岁(SD = 7.98)。参与者完成了30到60分钟的在线访谈。主题分析用于检查模式并确定行为、规范和控制信念的TPB结构中的总体主题。行为信念中的主题反映了改进的实践,特别是在与边缘群体的客户合作时。然而,在引导文化谦逊实践方面存在不确定性,并担心可能改变客户关系。规范信念的指涉对象包括临床机构、专业组织、大学培训项目、主管和导师。在控制信念中,促进者和障碍的主题集中在缺乏精神卫生系统的支持,个人局限性和优势以及专业发展。这项研究进一步了解了心理健康提供者的态度和意图,以文化谦逊的方式进行实践,并强调了这些实践的时间和方式的细微差别。这项研究可以帮助解决障碍,促进跨多个领域的心理健康提供者的文化谦逊实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal examines the organization, financing, delivery and outcomes of behavioral health services (i.e., alcohol, drug abuse, and mental disorders), providing practical and empirical contributions to and explaining the implications for the broader behavioral health field. Each issue includes an overview of contemporary concerns and recent developments in behavioral health policy and management through research articles, policy perspectives, commentaries, brief reports, and book reviews. This journal is the official publication of the National Council for Behavioral Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信