Considering Culturally Sensitive Dementia Care as a Prerequisite for Person-Centered Care: The Turkish Community in Germany as an Example.

IF 1.8 3区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Zümrüt Alpinar-Segawa, Sabine Salloch
{"title":"Considering Culturally Sensitive Dementia Care as a Prerequisite for Person-Centered Care: The Turkish Community in Germany as an Example.","authors":"Zümrüt Alpinar-Segawa, Sabine Salloch","doi":"10.1007/s10728-025-00529-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Culturally diverse societies often struggle with providing appropriate dementia care. Cultural sensitivity is considered an important prerequisite for meeting the needs of persons with dementia. This article discusses culture specific aspects of dementia care by referring to the Turkish community in Germany as an example. Factors are discussed that specifically infringe on the quality of dementia care for migrants. The article defends the claim that good dementia care for migrants can be provided through a person-centered approach which is again based on culturally sensitive approach. We show how culture shapes health phenomena but also argue that a focus on culture may stereotype individuals as belonging to a particular culture, grouping people together irrespective of their heterogeneity. Person-centered care is ideal for recognizing diverse needs and values. It is often seen as being at odds with culturally sensitive care, but this paper suggests a way of reconciling them. We argue that culture does indeed provide a framework to create the necessary foundation for person-centered care. Finally, some criticisms and plausible replies are discussed and practical implications arising from the analysis are presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":46740,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-025-00529-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Culturally diverse societies often struggle with providing appropriate dementia care. Cultural sensitivity is considered an important prerequisite for meeting the needs of persons with dementia. This article discusses culture specific aspects of dementia care by referring to the Turkish community in Germany as an example. Factors are discussed that specifically infringe on the quality of dementia care for migrants. The article defends the claim that good dementia care for migrants can be provided through a person-centered approach which is again based on culturally sensitive approach. We show how culture shapes health phenomena but also argue that a focus on culture may stereotype individuals as belonging to a particular culture, grouping people together irrespective of their heterogeneity. Person-centered care is ideal for recognizing diverse needs and values. It is often seen as being at odds with culturally sensitive care, but this paper suggests a way of reconciling them. We argue that culture does indeed provide a framework to create the necessary foundation for person-centered care. Finally, some criticisms and plausible replies are discussed and practical implications arising from the analysis are presented.

将文化敏感性痴呆护理视为以人为本护理的先决条件:以德国土耳其社区为例
文化多元的社会往往难以提供适当的痴呆症护理。文化敏感性被认为是满足痴呆症患者需求的重要先决条件。本文以德国的土耳其社区为例,讨论了痴呆症护理的文化具体方面。讨论了具体影响移民痴呆症护理质量的因素。文章为这样一种说法辩护,即可以通过以人为本的方法为移民提供良好的痴呆症护理,这种方法再次基于文化敏感的方法。我们展示了文化是如何塑造健康现象的,但也认为,对文化的关注可能会使个人成为属于特定文化的刻板印象,将人们分组在一起,而不管他们的异质性。以人为本的护理是认识多样化需求和价值的理想选择。它通常被视为与文化敏感护理相冲突,但本文提出了一种调和两者的方法。我们认为,文化确实提供了一个框架,为以人为本的护理创造必要的基础。最后,讨论了一些批评和合理的答复,并提出了分析产生的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: Health Care Analysis is a journal that promotes dialogue and debate about conceptual and normative issues related to health and health care, including health systems, healthcare provision, health law, public policy and health, professional health practice, health services organization and decision-making, and health-related education at all levels of clinical medicine, public health and global health. Health Care Analysis seeks to support the conversation between philosophy and policy, in particular illustrating the importance of conceptual and normative analysis to health policy, practice and research. As such, papers accepted for publication are likely to analyse philosophical questions related to health, health care or health policy that focus on one or more of the following: aims or ends, theories, frameworks, concepts, principles, values or ideology. All styles of theoretical analysis are welcome providing that they illuminate conceptual or normative issues and encourage debate between those interested in health, philosophy and policy. Papers must be rigorous, but should strive for accessibility – with care being taken to ensure that their arguments and implications are plain to a broad academic and international audience. In addition to purely theoretical papers, papers grounded in empirical research or case-studies are very welcome so long as they explore the conceptual or normative implications of such work. Authors are encouraged, where possible, to have regard to the social contexts of the issues they are discussing, and all authors should ensure that they indicate the ‘real world’ implications of their work. Health Care Analysis publishes contributions from philosophers, lawyers, social scientists, healthcare educators, healthcare professionals and administrators, and other health-related academics and policy analysts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信