Curve magnitude and vertebral rotation influence the MRI predictability of pedicle dimensions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an analysis of 1,860 pedicles.

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Karthik Ramachandran, Ashish Shankar Naik, Pushpa Bhari Thippeswamy, Ajoy Prasad Shetty, Rishi Mugesh Kanna, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
{"title":"Curve magnitude and vertebral rotation influence the MRI predictability of pedicle dimensions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an analysis of 1,860 pedicles.","authors":"Karthik Ramachandran, Ashish Shankar Naik, Pushpa Bhari Thippeswamy, Ajoy Prasad Shetty, Rishi Mugesh Kanna, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran","doi":"10.1007/s43390-025-01131-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the study is to assess the MRI predictability of pedicle dimensions in AIS patients with curve magnitude more than 50° and to determine the influence of curve magnitude and vertebral rotation on MRI predictability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included a comparative analysis of preoperative MRI (pMRI), and intraoperative CT (iCT) scan images of surgically corrected AIS patients with a curve magnitude of more than 50°. Bilateral T2-L4 pedicle levels were evaluated to measure the chord length and isthmic diameter in pMRI and iCT axial cuts. Vertebral rotation was assessed using the Nash and Moe method. Patients were categorised based on structural curve magnitude into group 1 (50°-70°), group 2 (71°-90°), and group 3 (> 90°).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1860 pedicles in 62 patients were analysed. Comparison between iCT and pMRI measurements showed excellent reliability (ICC > 0.90) for pedicle diameter at all levels except the apical levels. Comparison based on curve magnitude revealed at the apical levels showed good correlation (ICC = 0.87) in Group 1, moderate correlation (ICC = 0.75) in Group 2 and poor reliability (ICC = 0.37) in Group 3. However, the pedicle length showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.92) across all three groups. Moreover, MRI reliability for predicting vertebral dimensions decreased as the degree of rotation increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the curve magnitude and vertebral rotation significantly impact the MRI prediction of the pedicle dimensions, with predictability decreasing as the curve magnitude and vertebral rotation increase.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01131-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to assess the MRI predictability of pedicle dimensions in AIS patients with curve magnitude more than 50° and to determine the influence of curve magnitude and vertebral rotation on MRI predictability.

Methods: The study included a comparative analysis of preoperative MRI (pMRI), and intraoperative CT (iCT) scan images of surgically corrected AIS patients with a curve magnitude of more than 50°. Bilateral T2-L4 pedicle levels were evaluated to measure the chord length and isthmic diameter in pMRI and iCT axial cuts. Vertebral rotation was assessed using the Nash and Moe method. Patients were categorised based on structural curve magnitude into group 1 (50°-70°), group 2 (71°-90°), and group 3 (> 90°).

Results: A total of 1860 pedicles in 62 patients were analysed. Comparison between iCT and pMRI measurements showed excellent reliability (ICC > 0.90) for pedicle diameter at all levels except the apical levels. Comparison based on curve magnitude revealed at the apical levels showed good correlation (ICC = 0.87) in Group 1, moderate correlation (ICC = 0.75) in Group 2 and poor reliability (ICC = 0.37) in Group 3. However, the pedicle length showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.92) across all three groups. Moreover, MRI reliability for predicting vertebral dimensions decreased as the degree of rotation increased.

Conclusions: Both the curve magnitude and vertebral rotation significantly impact the MRI prediction of the pedicle dimensions, with predictability decreasing as the curve magnitude and vertebral rotation increase.

曲线大小和椎体旋转影响青少年特发性脊柱侧凸椎弓根尺寸的MRI可预测性:对1860个椎弓根的分析。
目的:本研究的目的是评估曲线幅度大于50°的AIS患者椎弓根尺寸的MRI可预测性,并确定曲线幅度和椎体旋转对MRI可预测性的影响。方法:对比分析经手术矫正的AIS患者曲线幅度大于50°的术前MRI (pMRI)和术中CT (iCT)扫描图像。评估双侧T2-L4椎弓根水平,以测量pMRI和iCT轴向切割的弦长和峡部直径。采用Nash和Moe方法评估椎体旋转。根据结构曲线大小将患者分为1组(50°-70°)、2组(71°-90°)和3组(> 90°)。结果:62例患者共分析了1860根椎弓根。iCT和pMRI测量结果的比较显示,除根尖水平外,所有水平的椎弓根直径都具有极好的可靠性(ICC > 0.90)。根据根尖水平显示的曲线幅度比较,组1的相关性较好(ICC = 0.87),组2的相关性中等(ICC = 0.75),组3的信度较差(ICC = 0.37)。然而,在所有三组中,椎弓根长度显示出极好的可靠性(ICC = 0.92)。此外,MRI预测椎体尺寸的可靠性随着旋转程度的增加而降低。结论:曲线大小和椎体旋转均显著影响椎弓根尺寸的MRI预测,随着曲线大小和椎体旋转的增加,可预测性降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信