{"title":"Analysis of cellular and gene therapy product reviews in the United States","authors":"Cheng-Fang Weng, Jhe-Yuan Dong, Shiuan-Fei Lin, Ai-Lei Jiang, Yu-Li Cheng, Lin-Chau Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The emergence of cellular and gene therapy (CGT) products has profoundly transformed healthcare by addressing previously unmet medical needs. However, developing these innovative therapies presents complex regulatory challenges that require thorough examination. This study aimed to identify strategies to mitigate potential delays or rejections in the CGT approval process. By analyzing review documents from the United States Food and Drug Administration, we found that quality concerns were the primary focus of Complete Response letters and postmarketing commitments, while safety concerns predominantly shaped postmarketing requirements, reflecting persistent uncertainties around CGTs. The unique characteristics of CGTs were also evident in their individualized clinical trial designs. Although the regulatory landscape is intricate, the increasing diversity of CGTs and accumulated experience have clarified key product-specific challenges. To facilitate approvals, it is crucial for applicants to address these deficiencies early, while we recommend that regulatory authorities re-evaluate the scope of utilizing postmarketing requirements. Enhanced collaboration among academia, industry, and regulatory authorities is essential to identify balanced, effective strategies, while continuous information gathering and monitoring are vital to ensure the safe, long-term administration of approved CGTs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 105885"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025001151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The emergence of cellular and gene therapy (CGT) products has profoundly transformed healthcare by addressing previously unmet medical needs. However, developing these innovative therapies presents complex regulatory challenges that require thorough examination. This study aimed to identify strategies to mitigate potential delays or rejections in the CGT approval process. By analyzing review documents from the United States Food and Drug Administration, we found that quality concerns were the primary focus of Complete Response letters and postmarketing commitments, while safety concerns predominantly shaped postmarketing requirements, reflecting persistent uncertainties around CGTs. The unique characteristics of CGTs were also evident in their individualized clinical trial designs. Although the regulatory landscape is intricate, the increasing diversity of CGTs and accumulated experience have clarified key product-specific challenges. To facilitate approvals, it is crucial for applicants to address these deficiencies early, while we recommend that regulatory authorities re-evaluate the scope of utilizing postmarketing requirements. Enhanced collaboration among academia, industry, and regulatory authorities is essential to identify balanced, effective strategies, while continuous information gathering and monitoring are vital to ensure the safe, long-term administration of approved CGTs.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)