Eunah Cho, Jinyoung Song, June Huh, I-Seok Kang, Hyun Ju Kim, In Young Youn, Hyebin Lee, Ji Hee Kwak
{"title":"Evaluation of Modified Fasting Protocols to Shorten Fasting Time Before Sedation in Children: A Prospective Randomized Noninferiority Trial.","authors":"Eunah Cho, Jinyoung Song, June Huh, I-Seok Kang, Hyun Ju Kim, In Young Youn, Hyebin Lee, Ji Hee Kwak","doi":"10.1111/pan.15142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Guidelines for fasting before procedural sedation aim to prevent pulmonary aspiration and are primarily targeted for deep sedation. Our study explored whether a shortened fasting protocol is noninferior to the standard protocol by comparing gastric contents evaluated by ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pediatric patients aged < 3 years, scheduled for elective transthoracic echocardiography under sedation, were randomly allocated to a standard group (4-h fasting) or a modified group (4-h fasting for solid and 1-h fasting for water). Gastric ultrasound was performed to evaluate cross-sectional area (CSA) in supine and right lateral decubitus positions (RLDP), with the upper body elevated at 45°. The primary outcome was the CSA-RLDP (CSA<sub>RLDP 45</sub>). A noninferiority test was performed applying the delta (Δ) of 2.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The noninferiority test showed that the modified fasting protocol was noninferior to the standard fasting protocol in terms of CSA<sub>RLDP 45</sub>, with a mean difference (95% confidence interval) of 0.16 (-0.55 to 0.87) within the noninferiority range of delta.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified fasting protocol was noninferior to the standard in pediatric patients undergoing sedation for transthoracic echocardiography, as assessed by gastric ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05810532.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.15142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Backgrounds: Guidelines for fasting before procedural sedation aim to prevent pulmonary aspiration and are primarily targeted for deep sedation. Our study explored whether a shortened fasting protocol is noninferior to the standard protocol by comparing gastric contents evaluated by ultrasound.
Methods: Pediatric patients aged < 3 years, scheduled for elective transthoracic echocardiography under sedation, were randomly allocated to a standard group (4-h fasting) or a modified group (4-h fasting for solid and 1-h fasting for water). Gastric ultrasound was performed to evaluate cross-sectional area (CSA) in supine and right lateral decubitus positions (RLDP), with the upper body elevated at 45°. The primary outcome was the CSA-RLDP (CSARLDP 45). A noninferiority test was performed applying the delta (Δ) of 2.1.
Results: The noninferiority test showed that the modified fasting protocol was noninferior to the standard fasting protocol in terms of CSARLDP 45, with a mean difference (95% confidence interval) of 0.16 (-0.55 to 0.87) within the noninferiority range of delta.
Conclusion: The modified fasting protocol was noninferior to the standard in pediatric patients undergoing sedation for transthoracic echocardiography, as assessed by gastric ultrasound.
期刊介绍:
Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.