Sex-related differences in cognition after severe murine traumatic brain injury: A Morris water maze study evaluating learning and memory.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Patricia Santos Carlin, Michael Coons, Priyanka Bele, Lewis J Kaplan, Matthew Culkin, Anastasia Georges, Christina L Jacovides, Patricia Martinez-Quinones, David Meaney, Alexandra Kauffman, Douglas Smith, Gary A Bass, Jose L Pascual
{"title":"Sex-related differences in cognition after severe murine traumatic brain injury: A Morris water maze study evaluating learning and memory.","authors":"Patricia Santos Carlin, Michael Coons, Priyanka Bele, Lewis J Kaplan, Matthew Culkin, Anastasia Georges, Christina L Jacovides, Patricia Martinez-Quinones, David Meaney, Alexandra Kauffman, Douglas Smith, Gary A Bass, Jose L Pascual","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A number of sex-related outcomes following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) appear to principally favor females. However, sex-related differences in post-TBI learning and memory remain underexplored. We hypothesized that females realize greater cognitive recovery than males following severe TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CD1 male (n = 12) and female (n = 12) mice were randomized to controlled cortical impact (severe TBI: impactor tip diameter, 3 mm; impact velocity, 6 m/s; depth, 1 mm; dwell time, 100 milliseconds) or sham craniotomy and followed for 14 days. Body weight loss recovery was measured daily as a surrogate of neuroclinical recovery. Mice underwent Morris water maze testing to evaluate learning (locating submerged escape platform) with cued and spatial trials and to recall (remembering platform location after it was removed) with probe trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with uninjured male mice, male mice with TBI failed to recover lost weight for the first 7 postinjury days (i.e., day 5: MTBI: -3.7% ± 1.5% vs. MSh: +4.1% ± 1.4% body weight; p < 0.01), while female mice with TBI recovered the same lost weight and at the same rate as sham female mice (FTBI: -1.6% ± 1.0% vs. FSh: -1.8% ± 0.9%, -0.02% ± 0.01%; p > 0.9). Learning (cued and spatial) after TBI was significantly worse in males but not in females. In probe trials, impaired memory after injury was only observed in females.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Severe TBI worsens cued and spatial learning and impairs weight loss recovery in male but not female mice. Female, but not male, mice sustain memory impairment after identical severe TBI. While the mechanism(s) that underpin these observations remain unclear, sex-related neurocognitive outcome differences question the universal applicability of trial-based evidence for clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004668","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A number of sex-related outcomes following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) appear to principally favor females. However, sex-related differences in post-TBI learning and memory remain underexplored. We hypothesized that females realize greater cognitive recovery than males following severe TBI.

Methods: CD1 male (n = 12) and female (n = 12) mice were randomized to controlled cortical impact (severe TBI: impactor tip diameter, 3 mm; impact velocity, 6 m/s; depth, 1 mm; dwell time, 100 milliseconds) or sham craniotomy and followed for 14 days. Body weight loss recovery was measured daily as a surrogate of neuroclinical recovery. Mice underwent Morris water maze testing to evaluate learning (locating submerged escape platform) with cued and spatial trials and to recall (remembering platform location after it was removed) with probe trials.

Results: Compared with uninjured male mice, male mice with TBI failed to recover lost weight for the first 7 postinjury days (i.e., day 5: MTBI: -3.7% ± 1.5% vs. MSh: +4.1% ± 1.4% body weight; p < 0.01), while female mice with TBI recovered the same lost weight and at the same rate as sham female mice (FTBI: -1.6% ± 1.0% vs. FSh: -1.8% ± 0.9%, -0.02% ± 0.01%; p > 0.9). Learning (cued and spatial) after TBI was significantly worse in males but not in females. In probe trials, impaired memory after injury was only observed in females.

Conclusion: Severe TBI worsens cued and spatial learning and impairs weight loss recovery in male but not female mice. Female, but not male, mice sustain memory impairment after identical severe TBI. While the mechanism(s) that underpin these observations remain unclear, sex-related neurocognitive outcome differences question the universal applicability of trial-based evidence for clinical care.

重度创伤性脑损伤后认知的性别差异:Morris水迷宫研究评估学习和记忆。
背景:严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的一些与性别相关的结果似乎主要有利于女性。然而,脑外伤后学习和记忆的性别差异仍未得到充分研究。我们假设女性在严重创伤性脑损伤后比男性实现更大的认知恢复。方法:将CD1雄性(n = 12)和雌性(n = 12)小鼠随机分为对照皮质撞击组(重度脑外伤:撞击器尖端直径3 mm;冲击速度,6m /s;深度,1mm;静置时间(100毫秒)或假开颅,随访14天。每天测量体重减轻的恢复情况,作为神经临床恢复的替代指标。Morris水迷宫实验采用提示和空间实验评估小鼠的学习能力(定位水下逃生平台),采用探针实验评估小鼠的回忆能力(在平台被移除后记忆平台位置)。结果:与未损伤的雄性小鼠相比,TBI雄性小鼠在损伤后的前7天(即第5天)未能恢复体重:MTBI: -3.7%±1.5% vs. MSh: +4.1%±1.4%;p < 0.01),而TBI雌性小鼠的体重恢复率与假性雌性小鼠相同(FTBI: -1.6%±1.0% vs. FSh: -1.8%±0.9%,-0.02%±0.01%;P > 0.9)。脑外伤后的学习(线索和空间)在男性中明显变差,而在女性中没有。在探针试验中,仅在女性中观察到损伤后的记忆受损。结论:重度脑外伤会使雄性小鼠的线索学习和空间学习能力恶化,并对体重恢复产生影响,但雌性小鼠没有。雌性老鼠,而不是雄性老鼠,在同样严重的脑外伤后会出现记忆损伤。虽然支持这些观察结果的机制尚不清楚,但与性别相关的神经认知结果差异质疑了临床护理中基于试验的证据的普遍适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信