Preparedness of public & private health facilities for management of diabetes & hypertension in 19 districts in India.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Vani Srinivas, Vinay Urs, Suresh Kumar N, Narendra Kumar Arora, Pankaja Raghav, Sarangi Das, Abhiruchi Galhotra, Praveen Kulkarni, Binod Kumar Patro, Ananth Ram, R Swetha, Saurabh Singh, Pradeep Joshi, Ravivarman Lakshmanasamy, Prashant Mathur
{"title":"Preparedness of public & private health facilities for management of diabetes & hypertension in 19 districts in India.","authors":"Vani Srinivas, Vinay Urs, Suresh Kumar N, Narendra Kumar Arora, Pankaja Raghav, Sarangi Das, Abhiruchi Galhotra, Praveen Kulkarni, Binod Kumar Patro, Ananth Ram, R Swetha, Saurabh Singh, Pradeep Joshi, Ravivarman Lakshmanasamy, Prashant Mathur","doi":"10.25259/IJMR_755_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background & objectives India has the second highest number of adults with diabetes in the world, and more than one-fourth of adults have hypertension. This article describes the preparedness of public and private health facilities for type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension management. Methods A cross-sectional survey of the health facilities was conducted in 19 districts of seven States in India, which included an assessment of both public and private health facilities. We used the Indian Public Health Standards and other relevant guidelines for assessment. The service domain score for four domains: equipment, medicine, diagnostics capacity, staff, including the availability of guidelines, and overall readiness score, was calculated following the Service Availability and Readiness Assessment manual of the World Health Organisation. The study considered a readiness score of ≥70 per cent to classify a facility as prepared for providing hypertension and diabetes services. Results Out of 415 health facilities covered in the survey, 75.7 per cent were public facilities. Most were primary care facilities (57.6%) and were located in rural areas (53.3%). The overall readiness score for providing hypertension and diabetes services was lowest for Sub-Centres (SCs; 61%) and Community Health Centres (CHCs; 59%), compared to other facilities. The readiness score for public Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and private primary care facilities (level 2) was 73 and 57 per cent, respectively. The readiness score of district hospitals, government private medical colleges, and other private tertiary care facilities was above 70 per cent, and they were considered prepared for services. Interpretations & conclusions PHCs were better prepared for diabetes and hypertension care than SCs, CHCs, and SDHs. By ensuring adequate human resources availability and uninterrupted supply of essential medicines, programme managers can further improve the preparedness of all public health facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":13349,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","volume":"161 4","pages":"327-335"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJMR_755_2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objectives India has the second highest number of adults with diabetes in the world, and more than one-fourth of adults have hypertension. This article describes the preparedness of public and private health facilities for type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension management. Methods A cross-sectional survey of the health facilities was conducted in 19 districts of seven States in India, which included an assessment of both public and private health facilities. We used the Indian Public Health Standards and other relevant guidelines for assessment. The service domain score for four domains: equipment, medicine, diagnostics capacity, staff, including the availability of guidelines, and overall readiness score, was calculated following the Service Availability and Readiness Assessment manual of the World Health Organisation. The study considered a readiness score of ≥70 per cent to classify a facility as prepared for providing hypertension and diabetes services. Results Out of 415 health facilities covered in the survey, 75.7 per cent were public facilities. Most were primary care facilities (57.6%) and were located in rural areas (53.3%). The overall readiness score for providing hypertension and diabetes services was lowest for Sub-Centres (SCs; 61%) and Community Health Centres (CHCs; 59%), compared to other facilities. The readiness score for public Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and private primary care facilities (level 2) was 73 and 57 per cent, respectively. The readiness score of district hospitals, government private medical colleges, and other private tertiary care facilities was above 70 per cent, and they were considered prepared for services. Interpretations & conclusions PHCs were better prepared for diabetes and hypertension care than SCs, CHCs, and SDHs. By ensuring adequate human resources availability and uninterrupted supply of essential medicines, programme managers can further improve the preparedness of all public health facilities.

在印度的19个县为管理糖尿病和高血压做好公共和私人卫生设施的准备。
背景与目标印度是世界上糖尿病患者人数第二多的国家,超过四分之一的成年人患有高血压。这篇文章描述了公共和私人卫生机构对2型糖尿病和高血压管理的准备。方法对印度7个邦的19个县的卫生设施进行了横断面调查,其中包括对公共和私营卫生设施的评估。我们使用印度公共卫生标准和其他相关准则进行评估。四个领域的服务领域得分:设备、药品、诊断能力、工作人员(包括指南的可用性)和总体准备程度得分,是根据世界卫生组织的服务可用性和准备程度评估手册计算的。该研究考虑准备程度评分≥70%,将设施分类为准备提供高血压和糖尿病服务。结果在调查覆盖的415个卫生设施中,75.7%为公共设施。大多数是初级保健机构(57.6%),位于农村地区(53.3%)。提供高血压和糖尿病服务的总体准备得分最低的是分中心(SCs;61%)和社区卫生中心(CHCs;59%),与其他设施相比。公立初级保健中心(phc)和私立初级保健设施(2级)的准备得分分别为73%和57%。地区医院、政府私立医学院和其他私立三级保健设施的准备程度得分在70%以上,它们被认为可以提供服务。解释和结论:与SCs、CHCs和sdh相比,PHCs对糖尿病和高血压的护理准备更充分。通过确保充足的人力资源和不间断的基本药物供应,方案管理人员可以进一步改进所有公共卫生设施的准备工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
191
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Research (IJMR) [ISSN 0971-5916] is one of the oldest medical Journals not only in India, but probably in Asia, as it started in the year 1913. The Journal was started as a quarterly (4 issues/year) in 1913 and made bimonthly (6 issues/year) in 1958. It became monthly (12 issues/year) in the year 1964.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信