Model rural health research units in India: A research priority setting exercise.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Jaya Singh Kshatri, Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Somen Kumar Pradhan, Shakti Ranjan Barik, Kavitha A K, Subrata Kumar Palo, Tanveer Rehman, Aparna Mukherjee, P Raja Kumar Subudhi, Smiteerekha Sahoo, Md Shaney Ali, Sanghamitra Pati
{"title":"Model rural health research units in India: A research priority setting exercise.","authors":"Jaya Singh Kshatri, Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Somen Kumar Pradhan, Shakti Ranjan Barik, Kavitha A K, Subrata Kumar Palo, Tanveer Rehman, Aparna Mukherjee, P Raja Kumar Subudhi, Smiteerekha Sahoo, Md Shaney Ali, Sanghamitra Pati","doi":"10.25259/IJMR_2157_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background & Objectives Research in rural health has historically been opportunistic, lacking alignment with strategic goals or community needs. The Government of India established Model Rural Health Research Units (MRHRUs) to address these disparities through targeted research. However, inconsistent outputs highlight the need for a strategic research agenda. Identifying research priorities is critical to inform policy and funding strategies of MRHRUs. Methods A nationwide Research Priority Setting (RPS) exercise was conducted, involving 120 respondents for free listing of questions, and 250 for ranking. Respondents from various stakeholder groups, including policymakers, researchers, and community representatives, participated. Research priorities were categorised into three domains - Description, Development, and Delivery. An iterative process was employed to refine and consolidate the 122 research questions into 36, which were subsequently ranked using a scoring system that assessed their importance, feasibility, and impact. The list of priorities was finalised through stakeholder deliberation. Results The top five research priorities across the three domains addressing key rural health challenges as identified in this study are presented. 'Descriptive' priorities included investigating social determinants of hypertension, medicine supply chain bottlenecks, and mental health in the elderly. 'Development' priorities focused on interventions using electronic health records in hospitals, tuberculosis control, and menstrual hygiene education. 'Delivery' priorities emphasised improving healthcare resilience, emergency care, and technology-driven diabetes management. These priorities were disseminated to MRHRU managers and policymakers to guide decisions with regard to perceived priorities for research in rural health. Interpretation & conclusions This first-of-its-kind RPS exercise provides inputs towards a strategic roadmap for rural health research, ensuring that future studies align with the needs of rural populations, leading to improved health outcomes. These findings illustrate perceptions and priorities of a selection of respondents from different stakeholder groups and need to be taken into consideration by the Department of Health Research and at the local level by each of the MRHRUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13349,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","volume":"161 4","pages":"337-345"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJMR_2157_2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Objectives Research in rural health has historically been opportunistic, lacking alignment with strategic goals or community needs. The Government of India established Model Rural Health Research Units (MRHRUs) to address these disparities through targeted research. However, inconsistent outputs highlight the need for a strategic research agenda. Identifying research priorities is critical to inform policy and funding strategies of MRHRUs. Methods A nationwide Research Priority Setting (RPS) exercise was conducted, involving 120 respondents for free listing of questions, and 250 for ranking. Respondents from various stakeholder groups, including policymakers, researchers, and community representatives, participated. Research priorities were categorised into three domains - Description, Development, and Delivery. An iterative process was employed to refine and consolidate the 122 research questions into 36, which were subsequently ranked using a scoring system that assessed their importance, feasibility, and impact. The list of priorities was finalised through stakeholder deliberation. Results The top five research priorities across the three domains addressing key rural health challenges as identified in this study are presented. 'Descriptive' priorities included investigating social determinants of hypertension, medicine supply chain bottlenecks, and mental health in the elderly. 'Development' priorities focused on interventions using electronic health records in hospitals, tuberculosis control, and menstrual hygiene education. 'Delivery' priorities emphasised improving healthcare resilience, emergency care, and technology-driven diabetes management. These priorities were disseminated to MRHRU managers and policymakers to guide decisions with regard to perceived priorities for research in rural health. Interpretation & conclusions This first-of-its-kind RPS exercise provides inputs towards a strategic roadmap for rural health research, ensuring that future studies align with the needs of rural populations, leading to improved health outcomes. These findings illustrate perceptions and priorities of a selection of respondents from different stakeholder groups and need to be taken into consideration by the Department of Health Research and at the local level by each of the MRHRUs.

印度农村卫生示范研究单位:确定研究重点的工作。
背景与目的农村卫生研究历来是机会主义的,缺乏与战略目标或社区需求的一致性。印度政府建立了农村卫生研究示范单位,通过有针对性的研究解决这些差异。然而,不一致的产出突出了战略研究议程的必要性。确定研究重点对于为mrhru的政策和资助战略提供信息至关重要。方法在全国范围内进行研究优先级设置(RPS), 120名受访者免费列出问题,250名受访者进行排名。来自不同利益相关者群体的受访者,包括政策制定者、研究人员和社区代表参加了会议。研究优先级分为三个领域——描述、开发和交付。采用迭代过程将122个研究问题提炼并整合为36个,随后使用评分系统评估其重要性、可行性和影响,对其进行排名。优先事项清单是通过利益相关者审议确定的。结果提出了本研究确定的三个领域解决关键农村卫生挑战的五大研究重点。“描述性”优先事项包括调查高血压的社会决定因素、药品供应链瓶颈和老年人的心理健康。“发展”优先事项侧重于在医院使用电子健康记录的干预措施、结核病控制和月经卫生教育。“交付”重点强调提高医疗韧性、急诊护理和技术驱动型糖尿病管理。这些优先事项已分发给MRHRU的管理人员和决策者,以指导有关农村卫生研究优先事项的决策。解释和结论这一首创的RPS活动为农村卫生研究的战略路线图提供了投入,确保未来的研究与农村人口的需求保持一致,从而改善卫生结果。这些调查结果说明了来自不同利益攸关方群体的选定答复者的看法和优先事项,需要卫生研究部和每个mrhru在地方一级加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
191
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Research (IJMR) [ISSN 0971-5916] is one of the oldest medical Journals not only in India, but probably in Asia, as it started in the year 1913. The Journal was started as a quarterly (4 issues/year) in 1913 and made bimonthly (6 issues/year) in 1958. It became monthly (12 issues/year) in the year 1964.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信