Does daily co administration of gonadotropins and letrozole during the ovarian stimulation improve IVF outcome for normal, poor and sub optimal responders?

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jigal Haas, Raoul Orvieto, Adva Aizer, Ettie Maman, Merav Noach-Hirsh, Lilach Marom Haham, Oshrit Lebovitz, Moran Shapira, Ravit Nahum
{"title":"Does daily co administration of gonadotropins and letrozole during the ovarian stimulation improve IVF outcome for normal, poor and sub optimal responders?","authors":"Jigal Haas, Raoul Orvieto, Adva Aizer, Ettie Maman, Merav Noach-Hirsh, Lilach Marom Haham, Oshrit Lebovitz, Moran Shapira, Ravit Nahum","doi":"10.1159/000546147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have described similar or improved IVF outcomes following co-administration of letrozole during ovarian stimulation (OS) in different patients' sub-populations.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Address and identify the sub-group of patients that might benefit from letrozole co-treatment throughout the entire OS. Methods,Setting, Participants: We reviewed the medical files of patients attending our IVF unit over a three-year period, for different indications, who underwent two successive IVF cycle attempt, where the 2nd included the co-administration of 5 mg Letrozole from OS day 1 until trigger day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Of whom, 65 were poor responders (oocytes≤ 3) during the first IVF cycle attempt, 85 were sub-optimal responders (4-9 oocytes) and 50 were normal responders (≥ 10 oocytes). The total dose of gonadotropins (4525±1553 vs. 4293±2166, p = NS) and length of stimulation (11.3±2.2 vs. 11.1±2.3, p=NS) were comparable between the two cycle attempts. Numbers of follicles ≥ 13mm (7.2±4.7 vs 6.2±4.3, p < 0.001), retrieved oocytes (8.6±6.1 vs. 6.9±5.5, p<0.001), zygotes (5.7±4.5 vs. 4.5±3.7 p<0.001) and number of TQE (2.5±2.5 vs. 1.8±1.9, p<0.001) were significantly higher in letrozole cycles. Sub analysis according to patients' ovarian response during the first attempt revealed that the poor and sub-optimal responders significantly benefit from the letrozole co-administration, while the normal responders did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Letrozole co-administration during OS for IVF increases the number of retrieved oocytes, zygotes and TQE in poor and suboptimal responders but not in normal responders.</p>","PeriodicalId":12952,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have described similar or improved IVF outcomes following co-administration of letrozole during ovarian stimulation (OS) in different patients' sub-populations.

Objectives: Address and identify the sub-group of patients that might benefit from letrozole co-treatment throughout the entire OS. Methods,Setting, Participants: We reviewed the medical files of patients attending our IVF unit over a three-year period, for different indications, who underwent two successive IVF cycle attempt, where the 2nd included the co-administration of 5 mg Letrozole from OS day 1 until trigger day.

Results: Two hundred patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Of whom, 65 were poor responders (oocytes≤ 3) during the first IVF cycle attempt, 85 were sub-optimal responders (4-9 oocytes) and 50 were normal responders (≥ 10 oocytes). The total dose of gonadotropins (4525±1553 vs. 4293±2166, p = NS) and length of stimulation (11.3±2.2 vs. 11.1±2.3, p=NS) were comparable between the two cycle attempts. Numbers of follicles ≥ 13mm (7.2±4.7 vs 6.2±4.3, p < 0.001), retrieved oocytes (8.6±6.1 vs. 6.9±5.5, p<0.001), zygotes (5.7±4.5 vs. 4.5±3.7 p<0.001) and number of TQE (2.5±2.5 vs. 1.8±1.9, p<0.001) were significantly higher in letrozole cycles. Sub analysis according to patients' ovarian response during the first attempt revealed that the poor and sub-optimal responders significantly benefit from the letrozole co-administration, while the normal responders did not.

Conclusions: Letrozole co-administration during OS for IVF increases the number of retrieved oocytes, zygotes and TQE in poor and suboptimal responders but not in normal responders.

在卵巢刺激期间每日联合使用促性腺激素和来曲唑能改善正常、不良和次优应答者的体外受精结果吗?
背景:先前的研究已经描述了不同患者亚群在卵巢刺激(OS)期间联合使用来曲唑后类似或改善的IVF结果。目的:定位并确定在整个OS中可能受益于来曲唑联合治疗的患者亚组。方法、环境、参与者:我们回顾了三年多来我们IVF部门就诊的不同适应症患者的医疗档案,这些患者经历了两次连续的IVF周期尝试,其中第二次包括从OS第1天到触发日共给药5mg来曲唑。结果:200例患者符合纳入标准,纳入研究。其中65例在第一次IVF周期尝试中反应不良(卵母细胞≤3),85例次优反应(4-9个卵母细胞),50例正常反应(≥10个卵母细胞)。促性腺激素总剂量(4525±1553比4293±2166,p=NS)和刺激时间(11.3±2.2比11.1±2.3,p=NS)在两个周期尝试之间具有可比性。卵泡≥13mm的数量(7.2±4.7 vs 6.2±4.3,p < 0.001),回收的卵母细胞(8.6±6.1 vs 6.9±5.5)。结论:体外受精OS期间,来曲唑联合使用增加了不良反应和次优反应者的卵母细胞、受精卵和TQE的数量,而正常反应者则没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal covers the most active and promising areas of current research in gynecology and obstetrics. Invited, well-referenced reviews by noted experts keep readers in touch with the general framework and direction of international study. Original papers report selected experimental and clinical investigations in all fields related to gynecology, obstetrics and reproduction. Short communications are published to allow immediate discussion of new data. The international and interdisciplinary character of this periodical provides an avenue to less accessible sources and to worldwide research for investigators and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信