Association of low dose oxytocin with pain intensity and delivery outcomes among primiparas who delivered vaginally with epidural block analgesia.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Fuxue Tang, Zhijie Zhang, Peikun Han
{"title":"Association of low dose oxytocin with pain intensity and delivery outcomes among primiparas who delivered vaginally with epidural block analgesia.","authors":"Fuxue Tang, Zhijie Zhang, Peikun Han","doi":"10.1159/000546524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper aimed to evaluate the influence of low-dose oxytocin (LDO) on pain intensity and delivery outcomes in primiparas who delivered vaginally with epidural block analgesia (EBA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 150 primiparas were retrospectively collected, and finally, 120 cases were included. They were divided into a control group (n = 60, received EBA) and an oxytocin group (n = 60, received EBA combined with LDO). Analgesic onset time, analgesic duration, time to flatus, and time to first bowel movement were compared. Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at pre-analgesia, cervical dilation of 3 cm, and fetal delivery. Serum levels of cortisol (Cor), norepinephrine (NE), and C-reactive protein (CRP) before and 24 hours post-delivery, postpartum bleeding, Apgar scores, delivery outcomes, and adverse reactions were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The oxytocin group had shorter times for gas passage and first bowel movement, as well as shorter durations of the first, second, and third stages of labor (p < 0.05). VAS scores at cervical dilation of 3 cm and fetal delivery were lower than pre-analgesia in both groups (p < 0.05), with no inter-group differences at each time point (p > 0.05). Serum Cor and NE decreased, while CRP increased at 24 hours postpartum (p < 0.05), with no inter-group differences (p > 0.05). The oxytocin group had less postpartum bleeding at 2 hours (p < 0.05), a higher natural delivery rate, and a lower incidence of uterine atony (p < 0.05), with no significant difference in Apgar scores (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EBA with LDO shortens labor duration, promotes gastrointestinal recovery, reduces uterine atony, postpartum hemorrhage, and vaginal assistive delivery rates, without affecting analgesia or stress response.</p>","PeriodicalId":12952,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This paper aimed to evaluate the influence of low-dose oxytocin (LDO) on pain intensity and delivery outcomes in primiparas who delivered vaginally with epidural block analgesia (EBA).

Methods: A total of 150 primiparas were retrospectively collected, and finally, 120 cases were included. They were divided into a control group (n = 60, received EBA) and an oxytocin group (n = 60, received EBA combined with LDO). Analgesic onset time, analgesic duration, time to flatus, and time to first bowel movement were compared. Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at pre-analgesia, cervical dilation of 3 cm, and fetal delivery. Serum levels of cortisol (Cor), norepinephrine (NE), and C-reactive protein (CRP) before and 24 hours post-delivery, postpartum bleeding, Apgar scores, delivery outcomes, and adverse reactions were compared.

Results: The oxytocin group had shorter times for gas passage and first bowel movement, as well as shorter durations of the first, second, and third stages of labor (p < 0.05). VAS scores at cervical dilation of 3 cm and fetal delivery were lower than pre-analgesia in both groups (p < 0.05), with no inter-group differences at each time point (p > 0.05). Serum Cor and NE decreased, while CRP increased at 24 hours postpartum (p < 0.05), with no inter-group differences (p > 0.05). The oxytocin group had less postpartum bleeding at 2 hours (p < 0.05), a higher natural delivery rate, and a lower incidence of uterine atony (p < 0.05), with no significant difference in Apgar scores (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: EBA with LDO shortens labor duration, promotes gastrointestinal recovery, reduces uterine atony, postpartum hemorrhage, and vaginal assistive delivery rates, without affecting analgesia or stress response.

低剂量催产素与硬膜外阻滞阴道分娩初产妇疼痛强度和分娩结局的关系。
目的:探讨低剂量催产素(LDO)对阴道硬膜外阻滞镇痛(EBA)分娩初产妇疼痛强度及分娩结局的影响。方法:对150例初产妇进行回顾性分析,最终纳入120例。将患者分为对照组(n = 60)和催产素组(n = 60),分别接受EBA和LDO治疗。比较镇痛起效时间、镇痛持续时间、胀气时间和首次排便时间。在镇痛前、宫颈扩张3 cm和胎儿分娩时,采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估疼痛强度。比较产前和产后24小时血清皮质醇(Cor)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)和c反应蛋白(CRP)水平、产后出血、Apgar评分、分娩结局和不良反应。结果:催产素组产程第一、二、三期产程持续时间短,产程第一、二、三期产程持续时间短(p < 0.05)。两组宫颈扩张3 cm及分娩时VAS评分均低于镇痛前(p < 0.05),各组间各时间点差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。产后24 h血清Cor、NE降低,CRP升高(p < 0.05),组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。催产素组产后2小时出血较少(p < 0.05),自然分娩率较高,子宫张力发生率较低(p < 0.05), Apgar评分差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:EBA联合LDO可缩短分娩时间,促进胃肠恢复,减少子宫张力、产后出血和阴道辅助分娩率,且不影响镇痛和应激反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal covers the most active and promising areas of current research in gynecology and obstetrics. Invited, well-referenced reviews by noted experts keep readers in touch with the general framework and direction of international study. Original papers report selected experimental and clinical investigations in all fields related to gynecology, obstetrics and reproduction. Short communications are published to allow immediate discussion of new data. The international and interdisciplinary character of this periodical provides an avenue to less accessible sources and to worldwide research for investigators and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信