Economical epidemiology, pathological populations, and the long history of the Demographic and Health Survey.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Public Health Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-18 DOI:10.1080/17441692.2025.2517786
John Nott
{"title":"Economical epidemiology, pathological populations, and the long history of the Demographic and Health Survey.","authors":"John Nott","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2025.2517786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the history of population health surveillance in modern Africa, considering the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) programme as a bridge between twentieth and twenty-first century epidemiology. Tracing this tradition of surveillance from pre-war Britain, through its extension into the British Empire, and its subsequent employment in post-colonial demography, this article makes two related arguments. The first, that surveys like the DHS complement and encourage economic logics in medicine. Focussing initially on questions of human capital, cross-sectional surveys have tended to promote and promise efficiency in terms of medical research and interventions, thereby reducing the need for extensive and expensive infrastructure. In Africa, this utility has meant that cross-sectional surveillance gained particular traction in the context of colonisation and again following the widespread implementation of Structural Adjustment Programmes from the early 1980s. The second argument takes that the collection of demographic and social data means that these surveys represent a unique form of surveillance medicine, one which encourages associations between illness, family, and society at large. Epidemiology drawn from these data promotes this pathologisation of population, binding the epistemology of contemporary Global Health to old ideas, and siting subaltern families and communities as a prime locus of disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"20 1","pages":"2517786"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2517786","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the history of population health surveillance in modern Africa, considering the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) programme as a bridge between twentieth and twenty-first century epidemiology. Tracing this tradition of surveillance from pre-war Britain, through its extension into the British Empire, and its subsequent employment in post-colonial demography, this article makes two related arguments. The first, that surveys like the DHS complement and encourage economic logics in medicine. Focussing initially on questions of human capital, cross-sectional surveys have tended to promote and promise efficiency in terms of medical research and interventions, thereby reducing the need for extensive and expensive infrastructure. In Africa, this utility has meant that cross-sectional surveillance gained particular traction in the context of colonisation and again following the widespread implementation of Structural Adjustment Programmes from the early 1980s. The second argument takes that the collection of demographic and social data means that these surveys represent a unique form of surveillance medicine, one which encourages associations between illness, family, and society at large. Epidemiology drawn from these data promotes this pathologisation of population, binding the epistemology of contemporary Global Health to old ideas, and siting subaltern families and communities as a prime locus of disease.

经济流行病学,病理人群,以及历史悠久的人口与健康调查。
本文考察了现代非洲人口健康监测的历史,认为人口与健康调查(DHS)计划是20世纪和21世纪流行病学之间的桥梁。从战前的英国追溯这种监视传统,通过其扩展到大英帝国,以及随后在后殖民人口统计中的应用,本文提出了两个相关的论点。第一,像国土安全部这样的调查补充并鼓励了医学中的经济逻辑。横断面调查最初侧重于人力资本问题,倾向于促进和保证医学研究和干预方面的效率,从而减少对广泛和昂贵的基础设施的需求。在非洲,这种效用意味着横断面监测在殖民时期以及在1980年代初开始广泛实施结构调整方案之后获得了特别的吸引力。第二种观点认为,人口统计和社会数据的收集意味着这些调查代表了一种独特的监测医学形式,它鼓励了疾病、家庭和整个社会之间的联系。从这些数据中得出的流行病学促进了人口的这种病理化,将当代全球卫生的认识论与旧观念结合起来,并将下层家庭和社区视为疾病的主要场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Public Health
Global Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信