Motivational preferences of interdisciplinary family physician team members in delivering integrated care: a best-worst scaling study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Weizhuo Chen, Zihui Xiong, Qiao Yang, Wenqi Xiao, Junyi Chen, Sisi Zhong, Ting Ye
{"title":"Motivational preferences of interdisciplinary family physician team members in delivering integrated care: a best-worst scaling study.","authors":"Weizhuo Chen, Zihui Xiong, Qiao Yang, Wenqi Xiao, Junyi Chen, Sisi Zhong, Ting Ye","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In China, integrated care is facilitated by interdisciplinary Family Physician Teams (FPTs) to extend primary care services without increasing physician numbers. However, the advancement of integrated care faces challenges due to insufficient motivators for Family Physician Team Members (FPTMs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To elucidate the motivational preferences of FPTMs within integrated care, highlighting preference heterogeneity across individuals with diverse demographic and professional characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in November 2022 with 363 FPTMs at community health centers affiliated with seven hospitals in Shenzhen city. The study assessed motivational preferences using a best-worst scaling (BWS) questionnaire to collect data. Conditional logit and mixed logit models were employed to analyze overall preferences and heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed a strong preference for patient-centered motivators, particularly highlighting patient needs, trust level, and adherence as key motivators that are crucial in shaping the engagement of FPTMs with integrated care. Additionally, heterogeneity in preference patterns was observed based on sex, education level, and professional role. Specifically, male FPTMs, those with a master's degree or higher, and general practitioners demonstrated a significantly stronger preference for employment benefits and government resource allocation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the preference of FPTMs for patient-level motivators, underscoring the importance of implementing a feedback mechanism to capture patients' perspectives on services. Policymakers are urged to develop tailored motivational structures that consider the varied preferences of team members across different roles, thereby motivating the provision of integrated care by FPTMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"42 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In China, integrated care is facilitated by interdisciplinary Family Physician Teams (FPTs) to extend primary care services without increasing physician numbers. However, the advancement of integrated care faces challenges due to insufficient motivators for Family Physician Team Members (FPTMs).

Objective: To elucidate the motivational preferences of FPTMs within integrated care, highlighting preference heterogeneity across individuals with diverse demographic and professional characteristics.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in November 2022 with 363 FPTMs at community health centers affiliated with seven hospitals in Shenzhen city. The study assessed motivational preferences using a best-worst scaling (BWS) questionnaire to collect data. Conditional logit and mixed logit models were employed to analyze overall preferences and heterogeneity.

Results: The study revealed a strong preference for patient-centered motivators, particularly highlighting patient needs, trust level, and adherence as key motivators that are crucial in shaping the engagement of FPTMs with integrated care. Additionally, heterogeneity in preference patterns was observed based on sex, education level, and professional role. Specifically, male FPTMs, those with a master's degree or higher, and general practitioners demonstrated a significantly stronger preference for employment benefits and government resource allocation.

Conclusion: The findings highlight the preference of FPTMs for patient-level motivators, underscoring the importance of implementing a feedback mechanism to capture patients' perspectives on services. Policymakers are urged to develop tailored motivational structures that consider the varied preferences of team members across different roles, thereby motivating the provision of integrated care by FPTMs.

跨学科家庭医生团队成员提供综合护理的动机偏好:一项最佳-最差尺度研究。
背景:在中国,跨学科家庭医生团队(FPTs)促进了综合护理,在不增加医生数量的情况下扩展了初级保健服务。然而,由于家庭医生团队成员(FPTMs)的动机不足,综合护理的发展面临挑战。目的:阐明FPTMs在综合护理中的动机偏好,强调不同人口统计学和职业特征个体的偏好异质性。方法:于2022年11月对深圳市7家医院附属社区卫生中心的363名FPTMs进行横断面研究。该研究使用最佳-最差量表(BWS)来收集数据,评估动机偏好。使用条件logit和混合logit模型分析总体偏好和异质性。结果:该研究揭示了对以患者为中心的激励因素的强烈偏好,特别是强调了患者的需求,信任水平和依从性作为关键激励因素,这些因素对于塑造fptm与综合护理的参与至关重要。此外,在性别、教育水平和职业角色的基础上,观察到偏好模式的异质性。具体而言,拥有硕士及以上学位的男性fptm和全科医生对就业福利和政府资源配置的偏好明显更强。结论:研究结果强调了FPTMs对患者层面激励因素的偏好,强调了实施反馈机制以获取患者对服务的看法的重要性。我们敦促政策制定者制定有针对性的激励结构,考虑到不同角色的团队成员的不同偏好,从而激励FPTMs提供综合护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信