Consensus Thyroid Nodule Radiofrequency Ablation Reporting Guidelines Established Using a Delphi Approach.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Kendyl Carlisle, Rebecca Kowalski, Qing Lina Hu-Bianco, Sophie Y Dream, Jonathon O Russell, Steven P Hodak, Jennifer H Kuo, Yinin Hu
{"title":"Consensus Thyroid Nodule Radiofrequency Ablation Reporting Guidelines Established Using a Delphi Approach.","authors":"Kendyl Carlisle, Rebecca Kowalski, Qing Lina Hu-Bianco, Sophie Y Dream, Jonathon O Russell, Steven P Hodak, Jennifer H Kuo, Yinin Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.eprac.2025.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has become increasingly utilized for thyroid nodules. However, best practice recommendations on data collection and outcomes reporting are lacking. The objective of this study was to generate consensus guidelines for thyroid RFA data collection for purposes of quality assurance and collaborative research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited a multidisciplinary panel of experienced RFA practitioners through the North American Society for Interventional Thyroidology. Using a modified Delphi process, experts created and iteratively revised a data collection form encompassing items from the pre-, intra-, and post-procedural phases. Emphasis was placed on parameters that are readily available to both community and academic-based practitioners. Items with >70% (strongly-agree) or 100% (agree) consensus for inclusion were retained. The Delphi process and the final reporting instrument were built on REDCap.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten panelists from 9 institutions performing a median of 22.5 cases/year completed five Delphi rounds. All panelists voted strongly-agree for retention on 63% (n=37) of included items. The final instrument was divided into three forms: 1. Pre-procedure (n= 18 items), 2. Immediate post-procedure (n=9 items), and 3. Follow-up (n=10 items).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adoption of these three new thyroid RFA data collection forms by new and established interventionalists may facilitate collaboration, standardized outcomes reporting, and clinical trial design.</p>","PeriodicalId":11682,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eprac.2025.06.006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has become increasingly utilized for thyroid nodules. However, best practice recommendations on data collection and outcomes reporting are lacking. The objective of this study was to generate consensus guidelines for thyroid RFA data collection for purposes of quality assurance and collaborative research.

Methods: We recruited a multidisciplinary panel of experienced RFA practitioners through the North American Society for Interventional Thyroidology. Using a modified Delphi process, experts created and iteratively revised a data collection form encompassing items from the pre-, intra-, and post-procedural phases. Emphasis was placed on parameters that are readily available to both community and academic-based practitioners. Items with >70% (strongly-agree) or 100% (agree) consensus for inclusion were retained. The Delphi process and the final reporting instrument were built on REDCap.

Results: Ten panelists from 9 institutions performing a median of 22.5 cases/year completed five Delphi rounds. All panelists voted strongly-agree for retention on 63% (n=37) of included items. The final instrument was divided into three forms: 1. Pre-procedure (n= 18 items), 2. Immediate post-procedure (n=9 items), and 3. Follow-up (n=10 items).

Conclusions: Adoption of these three new thyroid RFA data collection forms by new and established interventionalists may facilitate collaboration, standardized outcomes reporting, and clinical trial design.

共识甲状腺结节射频消融报告指南建立使用德尔菲方法。
目的:射频消融(RFA)越来越多地用于甲状腺结节。然而,缺乏关于数据收集和结果报告的最佳做法建议。本研究的目的是为了质量保证和合作研究的目的,为甲状腺RFA数据收集产生共识指南。方法:我们通过北美介入甲状腺学会招募了一个由经验丰富的射频消融医师组成的多学科小组。使用改进的德尔菲过程,专家创建并迭代修改了数据收集表,包括程序前,程序内和程序后阶段的项目。重点放在社区和以学术为基础的实践者可以随时获得的参数上。70%(强烈同意)或100%(同意)的项目被保留。在REDCap上建立了Delphi过程和最终报告工具。结果:来自9个机构的10名专家完成了5轮德尔菲,平均每年22.5例。所有小组成员都强烈同意保留63% (n=37)的内容。最后的文书分为三种形式:1。1 .前工序(n= 18项);术后即刻(n=9项)和3。随访(n=10项)。结论:新的和成熟的介入医师采用这三种新的甲状腺RFA数据收集表可以促进协作,标准化的结果报告和临床试验设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endocrine Practice
Endocrine Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
546
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Endocrine Practice (ISSN: 1530-891X), a peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year, is the official journal of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE). The primary mission of Endocrine Practice is to enhance the health care of patients with endocrine diseases through continuing education of practicing endocrinologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信