Glycemic control and asymptomatic carotid plaque and carotid intima-media thickness.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Jia Zhang, Xintong Song, Guanyi Zhang, Shengyun Chen, Xingquan Zhao, Qian Zhang
{"title":"Glycemic control and asymptomatic carotid plaque and carotid intima-media thickness.","authors":"Jia Zhang, Xintong Song, Guanyi Zhang, Shengyun Chen, Xingquan Zhao, Qian Zhang","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The effects of different glucose metabolic states and diabetes-controlled status on asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis has not been well investigated. Herein, we aimed to investigate the association of different diabetes status with asymptomatic carotid plaques and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>4752 participants aged over 40 years, free of stroke or myocardial infarction, from the China National Stroke Screen Survey programme were enrolled. Carotid plaque and CIMT were assessed using duplex ultrasonography. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between diabetes status and the presence of asymptomatic carotid plaques or abnormal CIMT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1977 (41.6%) subjects had carotid plaques and 804 (16.9%) had abnormal CIMT. In multivariate analyses, compared with normoglycemia, individuals with pre-diabetes showed significantly higher odds of asymptomatic carotid plaques (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.45) and patients with diabetes also had higher odds (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.92). Diabetes (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.14) was associated with vulnerable plaques, while pre-diabetes was not (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.43). Poorly controlled diabetes (HbA1c ≥7.5%) had higher odds of carotid plaques (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.44), especially of vulnerable plaques (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.67). No significant association was found between diabetes and abnormal CIMT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pre-diabetes and diabetes, especially poorly controlled diabetes, were associated with increased odds of asymptomatic carotid plaques. Implementing the most effective strategies to achieve optimal glycemic control is crucial for the prevention and management of atherosclerosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004786","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The effects of different glucose metabolic states and diabetes-controlled status on asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis has not been well investigated. Herein, we aimed to investigate the association of different diabetes status with asymptomatic carotid plaques and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT).

Research design and methods: 4752 participants aged over 40 years, free of stroke or myocardial infarction, from the China National Stroke Screen Survey programme were enrolled. Carotid plaque and CIMT were assessed using duplex ultrasonography. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between diabetes status and the presence of asymptomatic carotid plaques or abnormal CIMT.

Results: A total of 1977 (41.6%) subjects had carotid plaques and 804 (16.9%) had abnormal CIMT. In multivariate analyses, compared with normoglycemia, individuals with pre-diabetes showed significantly higher odds of asymptomatic carotid plaques (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.45) and patients with diabetes also had higher odds (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.92). Diabetes (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.14) was associated with vulnerable plaques, while pre-diabetes was not (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.43). Poorly controlled diabetes (HbA1c ≥7.5%) had higher odds of carotid plaques (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.44), especially of vulnerable plaques (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.67). No significant association was found between diabetes and abnormal CIMT.

Conclusions: Pre-diabetes and diabetes, especially poorly controlled diabetes, were associated with increased odds of asymptomatic carotid plaques. Implementing the most effective strategies to achieve optimal glycemic control is crucial for the prevention and management of atherosclerosis.

血糖控制与无症状颈动脉斑块和颈动脉内膜-中膜厚度。
不同的糖代谢状态和糖尿病控制状态对无症状颈动脉粥样硬化的影响尚未得到很好的研究。在此,我们旨在研究不同糖尿病状态与无症状颈动脉斑块和颈动脉内膜-中膜厚度(CIMT)的关系。研究设计和方法:从中国卒中筛查调查项目中招募4752名年龄在40岁以上、无卒中或心肌梗死的参与者。采用双工超声检查颈动脉斑块和CIMT。采用Logistic回归分析评估糖尿病状态与有无无症状颈动脉斑块或CIMT异常之间的关系。结果:颈动脉斑块1977例(41.6%),CIMT异常804例(16.9%)。在多变量分析中,与血糖正常者相比,糖尿病前期患者出现无症状颈动脉斑块的几率明显更高(OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.45),糖尿病患者出现无症状颈动脉斑块的几率也更高(OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.41 - 1.92)。糖尿病(OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.50 - 2.14)与易损斑块相关,而糖尿病前期与易损斑块无关(OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.96 - 1.43)。控制不良的糖尿病(HbA1c≥7.5%)发生颈动脉斑块的几率更高(OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.53 ~ 2.44),尤其是易损斑块(OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.55 ~ 2.67)。糖尿病与异常的CIMT之间没有明显的关联。结论:糖尿病前期和糖尿病,特别是控制不良的糖尿病,与无症状颈动脉斑块的发生率增加有关。实施最有效的策略以达到最佳血糖控制是预防和管理动脉粥样硬化的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
123
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care is an open access journal committed to publishing high-quality, basic and clinical research articles regarding type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and associated complications. Only original content will be accepted, and submissions are subject to rigorous peer review to ensure the publication of high-quality — and evidence-based — original research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信