Local Antibiotic Delivery Systems for Infection Prophylaxis in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: What Is the Evidence?

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Francis D Graziano, Ronnie L Shammas, Babak J Mehrara, Danielle H Rochlin
{"title":"Local Antibiotic Delivery Systems for Infection Prophylaxis in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: What Is the Evidence?","authors":"Francis D Graziano, Ronnie L Shammas, Babak J Mehrara, Danielle H Rochlin","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infection is a major complication of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR), leading to implant loss, increased healthcare costs, and poor outcomes. Local antibiotic delivery systems offer targeted infection prevention by providing sustained antibiotic release at the surgical site. The aim of this study is to review the existing literature on the efficacy of local antibiotic delivery systems in preventing infection in IBBR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted in Medline, Cochrane, and Embase (1990-2025). Studies assessing local antibiotic delivery in IBBR were included, while those evaluating systemic antibiotics, augmentation, and salvage procedures were excluded. Data on infection rates, implant loss, and complications were extracted and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 163 identified articles, 6 met inclusion criteria. Two studies examined calcium sulfate biodegradable antibiotic beads, which significantly lower implant loss rates (1.6% vs 9.4%, P = 0.031 and 1.5% vs 11.9%, P = 0.024). Two studies on polymethylmethacrylate antibiotic plates showed significant SSI reduction from 12.6% to 4.8% (P < 0.01) and from 14% to 4% (P = 0.047), with implant loss rates significantly lower in polymethylmethacrylate cohort (6% vs 18%, P = 0.036). Continuous postoperative antibiotic irrigation studies demonstrated SSI reduction from 6.4% to 1.9% (P = 0.007) and decreased explant rate from 20% to 2.9% (P = 0.037), but one study reported a higher seroma rate (4.7% vs 1.4%, P = 0.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preliminary studies suggest local antibiotic delivery may reduce infection and implant loss in breast reconstruction, but retrospective designs and methodological limitations preclude definitive conclusions. Prospective studies are needed to confirm efficacy, safety, and clinical value.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004416","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infection is a major complication of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR), leading to implant loss, increased healthcare costs, and poor outcomes. Local antibiotic delivery systems offer targeted infection prevention by providing sustained antibiotic release at the surgical site. The aim of this study is to review the existing literature on the efficacy of local antibiotic delivery systems in preventing infection in IBBR.

Methods: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted in Medline, Cochrane, and Embase (1990-2025). Studies assessing local antibiotic delivery in IBBR were included, while those evaluating systemic antibiotics, augmentation, and salvage procedures were excluded. Data on infection rates, implant loss, and complications were extracted and analyzed.

Results: Of 163 identified articles, 6 met inclusion criteria. Two studies examined calcium sulfate biodegradable antibiotic beads, which significantly lower implant loss rates (1.6% vs 9.4%, P = 0.031 and 1.5% vs 11.9%, P = 0.024). Two studies on polymethylmethacrylate antibiotic plates showed significant SSI reduction from 12.6% to 4.8% (P < 0.01) and from 14% to 4% (P = 0.047), with implant loss rates significantly lower in polymethylmethacrylate cohort (6% vs 18%, P = 0.036). Continuous postoperative antibiotic irrigation studies demonstrated SSI reduction from 6.4% to 1.9% (P = 0.007) and decreased explant rate from 20% to 2.9% (P = 0.037), but one study reported a higher seroma rate (4.7% vs 1.4%, P = 0.033).

Conclusions: Preliminary studies suggest local antibiotic delivery may reduce infection and implant loss in breast reconstruction, but retrospective designs and methodological limitations preclude definitive conclusions. Prospective studies are needed to confirm efficacy, safety, and clinical value.

植入式乳房重建术中预防感染的局部抗生素输送系统:证据是什么?
背景:感染是假体乳房重建(IBBR)的主要并发症,导致假体丢失、医疗费用增加和预后不良。局部抗生素递送系统通过在手术部位提供持续的抗生素释放来提供有针对性的感染预防。本研究的目的是回顾有关局部抗生素输送系统在预防IBBR感染中的有效性的现有文献。方法:在Medline、Cochrane和Embase(1990-2025)中按照系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目进行系统评价。评估IBBR中局部抗生素给药的研究被纳入,而那些评估全身抗生素、增强和挽救程序的研究被排除在外。提取并分析了感染率、种植体丢失和并发症的数据。结果:163篇文献中,6篇符合纳入标准。两项研究检测了硫酸钙可生物降解抗生素微球,显著降低了种植体损失率(1.6% vs 9.4%, P = 0.031; 1.5% vs 11.9%, P = 0.024)。两项研究显示,聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯抗生素钢板的SSI从12.6%降低到4.8% (P < 0.01),从14%降低到4% (P = 0.047),聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯组的种植体损失率显著降低(6%对18%,P = 0.036)。持续的术后抗生素冲洗研究表明,SSI从6.4%降低到1.9% (P = 0.007),外植体率从20%降低到2.9% (P = 0.037),但一项研究报告了更高的血肿率(4.7% vs 1.4%, P = 0.033)。结论:初步研究表明,局部使用抗生素可减少乳房重建术中的感染和植入物丢失,但回顾性设计和方法学的局限性妨碍了明确的结论。需要前瞻性研究来确认有效性、安全性和临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信