Factors Associated With Delays in Discharge for Patients Undergoing Chronic Wound Reconstruction.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Rachel H Park, Jennifer Smith, Robert G DeVito, Jesse Chou, Ashley Zhang, Brent R DeGeorge
{"title":"Factors Associated With Delays in Discharge for Patients Undergoing Chronic Wound Reconstruction.","authors":"Rachel H Park, Jennifer Smith, Robert G DeVito, Jesse Chou, Ashley Zhang, Brent R DeGeorge","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delay in discharge following chronic wound reconstruction is a concern that adds to the national hospital bed shortage crisis. This study aims to identify and analyze the factors associated with delay in discharge after wound reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent chronic wound reconstruction by a plastic surgeon at a single tertiary academic hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 was performed using CPT codes. Patients admitted with other primary diagnoses or to the ICU were excluded. Demographic data as well as socioeconomic factors, insurance status, disposition, and other discharge needs were recorded and analyzed in relation to days delay in discharge. A univariate negative binomial count model was used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 131 encounters were included in the study with 61 encounters in delay group and 70 in no delay group. Delay group experienced mean discharge delay of 3.03 days. There were no significant differences in medical comorbidities between the 2 groups. Patients with commercial insurances had shorter mean delay (0.79 days) compared to that of patients with government-issued insurances (1.52-1.69 days). Those discharging to a facility like rehabilitation center, skilled nursing facility, or long-term acute care had about 3.5 days of delay compared to those going home. Other requirements such as IV antibiotics, home VAC, or durable medical equipment did not significantly affect discharge timing in discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delays in discharge after chronic wound reconstruction are common, and socioeconomic factors including insurance status and disposition were the 2 most significant predictors of delay.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Delay in discharge following chronic wound reconstruction is a concern that adds to the national hospital bed shortage crisis. This study aims to identify and analyze the factors associated with delay in discharge after wound reconstruction.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent chronic wound reconstruction by a plastic surgeon at a single tertiary academic hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 was performed using CPT codes. Patients admitted with other primary diagnoses or to the ICU were excluded. Demographic data as well as socioeconomic factors, insurance status, disposition, and other discharge needs were recorded and analyzed in relation to days delay in discharge. A univariate negative binomial count model was used for statistical analysis.

Results: A total of 131 encounters were included in the study with 61 encounters in delay group and 70 in no delay group. Delay group experienced mean discharge delay of 3.03 days. There were no significant differences in medical comorbidities between the 2 groups. Patients with commercial insurances had shorter mean delay (0.79 days) compared to that of patients with government-issued insurances (1.52-1.69 days). Those discharging to a facility like rehabilitation center, skilled nursing facility, or long-term acute care had about 3.5 days of delay compared to those going home. Other requirements such as IV antibiotics, home VAC, or durable medical equipment did not significantly affect discharge timing in discharge.

Conclusion: Delays in discharge after chronic wound reconstruction are common, and socioeconomic factors including insurance status and disposition were the 2 most significant predictors of delay.

慢性伤口重建患者延迟出院的相关因素。
背景:慢性伤口重建后的延迟出院是一个令人担忧的问题,增加了国家医院床位短缺危机。本研究旨在识别和分析与伤口重建后延迟出院相关的因素。方法:回顾性分析2019年1月至2021年12月在一家三级学术医院接受整形外科医生慢性伤口重建的所有患者,使用CPT代码。排除其他原发诊断或ICU的患者。记录和分析与延迟出院天数相关的人口统计数据、社会经济因素、保险状况、处置和其他出院需求。采用单变量负二项计数模型进行统计分析。结果:共纳入131例就诊,其中延迟组61例,无延迟组70例。延迟组平均延迟放电3.03天。两组患者合并症发生率无显著差异。商业保险患者的平均延迟时间(0.79天)比政府发行的保险患者(1.52-1.69天)短。与回家的人相比,那些出院到康复中心、专业护理机构或长期急性护理等机构的人大约延迟了3.5天。其他要求,如静脉注射抗生素、家用VAC或耐用的医疗设备,对出院时间没有显著影响。结论:慢性创面重建术后延迟出院较为常见,社会经济因素(包括保险状况和处置)是延迟出院的2个最显著的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信