Urban-Rural Disparities in Perceived Benefits and Challenges for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participation.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tirna Purkait, Dipti A Dev, Natalie Koziol, Jaclyn A Saltzman, Jasmin Smith, Lisa Franzen-Castle
{"title":"Urban-Rural Disparities in Perceived Benefits and Challenges for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participation.","authors":"Tirna Purkait, Dipti A Dev, Natalie Koziol, Jaclyn A Saltzman, Jasmin Smith, Lisa Franzen-Castle","doi":"10.1177/08901171251352703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThis research investigates the perceived benefits and challenges of participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) among households with young children across urban and rural Nebraska, aiming to address the limited exploration of disparities in its reach.DesignCross-Sectional (SNAP-Ed Needs and Assets Assessment).SettingHouseholds across Nebraska.ParticipantsLow-income families with at least 1 child aged 6 or younger (n = 1040).MeasuresPerceived benefits and challenges to SNAP participation across urban-rural populations, controlling for race, income, and education.AnalysisChi-square tests and logistic regression with Benjamini-Hochberg correction.ResultsOverall, financial need was perceived as the top reported benefit, while time and efforts for recertification were the top challenge. Rural residents perceived financial need (<i>P</i> < 001) and ability to have enough healthy food (<i>P</i> < 05) as major drivers for SNAP enrollment, whereas urban residents perceived previous SNAP-Ed participation (<i>P</i> < 001) and positive peer influence (<i>P</i> < 01) as benefits. Rural respondents perceived greater challenges in SNAP application requiring more time and effort (<i>P</i> < 001), while urban respondents had significantly higher concerns about native language accessibility (<i>P</i> < 001), poor customer service (<i>P</i> < 05), and unwillingness to depend on government agencies (<i>P</i> < 05).ConclusionGeographically and culturally tailored SNAP-Ed interventions and streamlined application processes are required to address the urban-rural disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171251352703"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251352703","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis research investigates the perceived benefits and challenges of participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) among households with young children across urban and rural Nebraska, aiming to address the limited exploration of disparities in its reach.DesignCross-Sectional (SNAP-Ed Needs and Assets Assessment).SettingHouseholds across Nebraska.ParticipantsLow-income families with at least 1 child aged 6 or younger (n = 1040).MeasuresPerceived benefits and challenges to SNAP participation across urban-rural populations, controlling for race, income, and education.AnalysisChi-square tests and logistic regression with Benjamini-Hochberg correction.ResultsOverall, financial need was perceived as the top reported benefit, while time and efforts for recertification were the top challenge. Rural residents perceived financial need (P < 001) and ability to have enough healthy food (P < 05) as major drivers for SNAP enrollment, whereas urban residents perceived previous SNAP-Ed participation (P < 001) and positive peer influence (P < 01) as benefits. Rural respondents perceived greater challenges in SNAP application requiring more time and effort (P < 001), while urban respondents had significantly higher concerns about native language accessibility (P < 001), poor customer service (P < 05), and unwillingness to depend on government agencies (P < 05).ConclusionGeographically and culturally tailored SNAP-Ed interventions and streamlined application processes are required to address the urban-rural disparities.

参与补充营养援助计划(SNAP)的城乡差异和挑战
本研究调查了内布拉斯加州城市和农村有幼儿的家庭参加补充营养援助计划(SNAP)的好处和挑战,旨在解决对其覆盖范围的差异的有限探索。设计横断面(SNAP-Ed需求和资产评估)。内布拉斯加州的家庭。参与者:至少有一个6岁或6岁以下儿童的低收入家庭(n = 1040)。衡量城乡人口参与SNAP的收益和挑战,控制种族、收入和教育。分析:经Benjamini-Hochberg校正的卡方检验和logistic回归。结果总体而言,财务需求被认为是报告的最大好处,而重新认证的时间和努力是最大的挑战。农村居民认为经济需求(P < 001)和有能力获得足够的健康食品(P < 05)是参加SNAP的主要驱动因素,而城市居民认为以前参加过SNAP- ed (P < 001)和积极的同伴影响(P < 01)是好处。农村受访者认为SNAP应用面临更大的挑战,需要更多的时间和精力(P < 001),而城市受访者对母语可及性(P < 001)、差的客户服务(P < 05)和不愿意依赖政府机构(P < 05)的担忧明显更高。结论要解决城乡差异,需要针对不同地域和文化的SNAP-Ed干预措施和简化申请流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信