A narrative review and scoring proposal for secondary lumbar instability after lumbar decompression surgery.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anto Abramovic, Sara Lener, Sebastian Hartmann, Claudius Thomé
{"title":"A narrative review and scoring proposal for secondary lumbar instability after lumbar decompression surgery.","authors":"Anto Abramovic, Sara Lener, Sebastian Hartmann, Claudius Thomé","doi":"10.1007/s00701-025-06590-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common condition in the aging population, where decompressive surgery (DS) is widely regarded as the gold standard due to its effectiveness in relieving symptoms. However, DS carries the risk of secondary lumbar instability (SLI), while fusion surgery, although mitigating this risk, may lead to overtreatment and complications such as adjacent segment disease. The aim of the present study was to review the current literature on preoperative radiological and clinical variables, thus accounting for SLI after lumbar decompression surgery and to derive a score for SLI risk prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review using online databases was performed in order to identify risk factors for the emergence of SLI. Risk factors were then graded for relevance. Consequently, a risk score for predicting SLI was developed from these results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>25 studies including 9754 patients were identified. The most commonly described predictors for SLI were preoperative instability, disc height > 6.5 mm, surgical invasiveness as well as patient-related risk factors such as BMI, age, gender and presence of mechanical low back pain. Based on these results, a 14-point scale was created using the most relevant risk factors selected by the research group using a peer-review process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed score identifies known risk factors for SLI, rated according to their importance on clinical decision making. This represents an initial theoretical approach that has to be validated by prospective clinical studies. Nevertheless, decision making may already be supported by the awareness of the characterized risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":7370,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurochirurgica","volume":"167 1","pages":"171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurochirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-025-06590-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common condition in the aging population, where decompressive surgery (DS) is widely regarded as the gold standard due to its effectiveness in relieving symptoms. However, DS carries the risk of secondary lumbar instability (SLI), while fusion surgery, although mitigating this risk, may lead to overtreatment and complications such as adjacent segment disease. The aim of the present study was to review the current literature on preoperative radiological and clinical variables, thus accounting for SLI after lumbar decompression surgery and to derive a score for SLI risk prediction.

Methods: A literature review using online databases was performed in order to identify risk factors for the emergence of SLI. Risk factors were then graded for relevance. Consequently, a risk score for predicting SLI was developed from these results.

Results: 25 studies including 9754 patients were identified. The most commonly described predictors for SLI were preoperative instability, disc height > 6.5 mm, surgical invasiveness as well as patient-related risk factors such as BMI, age, gender and presence of mechanical low back pain. Based on these results, a 14-point scale was created using the most relevant risk factors selected by the research group using a peer-review process.

Conclusion: The proposed score identifies known risk factors for SLI, rated according to their importance on clinical decision making. This represents an initial theoretical approach that has to be validated by prospective clinical studies. Nevertheless, decision making may already be supported by the awareness of the characterized risk factors.

腰椎减压手术后继发性腰椎不稳的叙述性回顾和评分建议。
目的:腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)是老年人的常见病,减压手术(DS)因其缓解症状的有效性而被广泛认为是金标准。然而,退行性椎体滑移有继发性腰椎不稳定(SLI)的风险,而融合手术虽然减轻了这种风险,但可能导致过度治疗和邻近节段疾病等并发症。本研究的目的是回顾目前关于术前放射学和临床变量的文献,从而考虑腰椎减压手术后的SLI,并得出SLI风险预测的评分。方法:使用在线数据库进行文献综述,以确定SLI出现的危险因素。然后根据相关性对风险因素进行分级。因此,根据这些结果开发了预测SLI的风险评分。结果:共纳入25项研究,9754例患者。最常见的预测因素是术前不稳定、椎间盘高度bbb6.5 mm、手术侵入性以及患者相关的危险因素,如BMI、年龄、性别和机械性腰痛的存在。基于这些结果,研究小组通过同行评审过程选择了最相关的风险因素,创建了一个14分的量表。结论:提出的评分确定了已知的SLI危险因素,并根据其对临床决策的重要性进行评分。这代表了一种初步的理论方法,必须通过前瞻性临床研究来验证。然而,对特征风险因素的认识可能已经支持了决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neurochirurgica
Acta Neurochirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes only original papers useful both to research and clinical work. Papers should deal with clinical neurosurgery - diagnosis and diagnostic techniques, operative surgery and results, postoperative treatment - or with research work in neuroscience if the underlying questions or the results are of neurosurgical interest. Reports on congresses are given in brief accounts. As official organ of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies the journal publishes all announcements of the E.A.N.S. and reports on the activities of its member societies. Only contributions written in English will be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信