Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks Improve Success Rate of Closed Reduction of Colles' Fractures: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anette B Christensen, Christine IIkjær, Torben K Laustrup, Esben Sejer, Camilla Rønnøw, Kaj V Døssing, Troels B Jensen, Jacob K Andersen, Christoffer G Sølling
{"title":"Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks Improve Success Rate of Closed Reduction of Colles' Fractures: A Randomised Controlled Trial.","authors":"Anette B Christensen, Christine IIkjær, Torben K Laustrup, Esben Sejer, Camilla Rønnøw, Kaj V Døssing, Troels B Jensen, Jacob K Andersen, Christoffer G Sølling","doi":"10.1111/aas.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The initial treatment for distal forearm fractures, including Colles' fractures, involves closed reduction, for which effective pain management is essential. In Colles' fractures, achieving a satisfactory closed reduction may eliminate the need for surgical intervention. While ultrasound-guided nerve blocks are effective, hematoma blocks (HB) are often favored due to their feasibility in the emergency care setting. Further research comparing treatment outcomes is warranted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a multicentre randomised controlled trial, adults with distal forearm fractures were assigned to either ultrasound-guided blocks of the radial and median nerves (US) or HB for closed fracture reduction. The primary endpoint was satisfactory fracture reduction. Secondary endpoints were secondary fracture dislocation, self-reported pain, and time spent in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 238 patients with Colles' fracture, 117 received US and 121 received HB. Satisfactory fracture reduction was achieved in 73 (62%) and 49 (40%) patients, respectively (p = 0.01). Surgical correction was conducted in 61 (52%) patients in the US group, contrasting 80 (66%) patients in the HB group (p = 0.03). During the fracture reduction, no difference in self-reported pain was observed (p = 0.21) for patients with distal forearm fractures (n = 247). The median time from block application to fracture reduction was 45 min in the US group and 25 min in the HB group (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided median and radial nerve blocks had a higher success rate for Colles' fracture reduction than the hematoma block group. The influence of anesthetic techniques on the eventual need for surgery requires further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 6","pages":"e70063"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The initial treatment for distal forearm fractures, including Colles' fractures, involves closed reduction, for which effective pain management is essential. In Colles' fractures, achieving a satisfactory closed reduction may eliminate the need for surgical intervention. While ultrasound-guided nerve blocks are effective, hematoma blocks (HB) are often favored due to their feasibility in the emergency care setting. Further research comparing treatment outcomes is warranted.

Methods: In a multicentre randomised controlled trial, adults with distal forearm fractures were assigned to either ultrasound-guided blocks of the radial and median nerves (US) or HB for closed fracture reduction. The primary endpoint was satisfactory fracture reduction. Secondary endpoints were secondary fracture dislocation, self-reported pain, and time spent in the emergency department.

Results: Among 238 patients with Colles' fracture, 117 received US and 121 received HB. Satisfactory fracture reduction was achieved in 73 (62%) and 49 (40%) patients, respectively (p = 0.01). Surgical correction was conducted in 61 (52%) patients in the US group, contrasting 80 (66%) patients in the HB group (p = 0.03). During the fracture reduction, no difference in self-reported pain was observed (p = 0.21) for patients with distal forearm fractures (n = 247). The median time from block application to fracture reduction was 45 min in the US group and 25 min in the HB group (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided median and radial nerve blocks had a higher success rate for Colles' fracture reduction than the hematoma block group. The influence of anesthetic techniques on the eventual need for surgery requires further investigation.

超声引导神经阻滞提高Colles骨折闭合复位成功率:一项随机对照试验。
背景:前臂远端骨折(包括Colles骨折)的初始治疗包括闭合复位,有效的疼痛管理是必不可少的。在Colles骨折中,达到满意的闭合复位可以消除手术干预的需要。虽然超声引导的神经阻滞是有效的,但血肿阻滞(HB)往往因其在急诊护理环境中的可行性而受到青睐。进一步的研究比较治疗结果是有必要的。方法:在一项多中心随机对照试验中,患有前臂远端骨折的成年人被分配到超声引导的桡骨和正中神经阻滞(US)或HB进行闭合性骨折复位。主要终点是令人满意的骨折复位。次要终点是继发性骨折脱位、自我报告的疼痛和在急诊室度过的时间。结果:238例Colles骨折患者中,US治疗117例,HB治疗121例。分别有73例(62%)和49例(40%)患者骨折复位满意(p = 0.01)。美国组有61例(52%)患者进行了手术矫正,HB组有80例(66%)患者进行了手术矫正(p = 0.03)。在骨折复位期间,前臂远端骨折(n = 247)患者自我报告的疼痛无差异(p = 0.21)。US组从阻滞应用到骨折复位的中位时间为45 min, HB组为25 min。(p)结论:超声引导下正中神经和桡神经阻滞治疗Colles骨折复位的成功率高于血肿阻滞组。麻醉技术对最终手术需求的影响有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信