Developmental Trajectories of Emotional Availability Differ Between Dyads With Children With and Without Motor Delay

IF 2.6 2区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL

Infancy Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI:10.1111/infa.70027

Rebecca Molinini, Corri Stuyvenburg, Natalie A. Koziol, Regina T. Harbourne, Michele A. Lobo, Sandra L. Willett, James A. Bovaird, Emily Marcinowski, Sarah K. Price, Mary Shall, Virginia W. Chu, Stacey C. Dusing

{"title":"Developmental Trajectories of Emotional Availability Differ Between Dyads With Children With and Without Motor Delay","authors":"Rebecca Molinini, Corri Stuyvenburg, Natalie A. Koziol, Regina T. Harbourne, Michele A. Lobo, Sandra L. Willett, James A. Bovaird, Emily Marcinowski, Sarah K. Price, Mary Shall, Virginia W. Chu, Stacey C. Dusing","doi":"10.1111/infa.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>This study investigated associations of gross motor delay and dyadic emotional availability (EA). Data were drawn from 99 children (Mean age = 8.79 [SD = 3.2] months, 47% Female, and 67% White) with and without motor delay and their caregivers. EA was quantified from five parent–child interactions collected over 12 months. Dyads with children with significant motor delay had significantly less growth in Total EA, Child EA, Sensitivity, Responsiveness, and Involvement compared to dyads with children with typical motor development. Children with mild motor delay differed from children with typical motor development in Involvement. Severity of motor delay was associated with risk to EA in that dyads of children with more significant motor delay had more difficulties with EA over time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02593825).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47895,"journal":{"name":"Infancy","volume":"30 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infancy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/infa.70027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated associations of gross motor delay and dyadic emotional availability (EA). Data were drawn from 99 children (Mean age = 8.79 [SD = 3.2] months, 47% Female, and 67% White) with and without motor delay and their caregivers. EA was quantified from five parent–child interactions collected over 12 months. Dyads with children with significant motor delay had significantly less growth in Total EA, Child EA, Sensitivity, Responsiveness, and Involvement compared to dyads with children with typical motor development. Children with mild motor delay differed from children with typical motor development in Involvement. Severity of motor delay was associated with risk to EA in that dyads of children with more significant motor delay had more difficulties with EA over time.

Trial Registration: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02593825).

查看原文本刊更多论文

运动迟缓儿童的情绪可得性发展轨迹存在差异

本研究探讨了大运动延迟与二元情绪可得性（EA）的关系。数据来自有或没有运动迟缓的99名儿童及其照顾者（平均年龄= 8.79 [SD = 3.2]个月，47%为女性，67%为白人）。EA从12个月内收集的5次亲子互动中量化。与具有典型运动发育的儿童相比，具有显著运动迟缓儿童的两组儿童在总EA、儿童EA、敏感性、反应性和参与方面的增长明显较低。轻度运动迟缓儿童与典型运动发育儿童在涉入方面存在差异。运动延迟的严重程度与EA的风险相关，随着时间的推移，运动延迟越严重的儿童患EA的困难越大。试验注册：该试验在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册（标识符：NCT02593825）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Infancy PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Infancy, the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies, emphasizes the highest quality original research on normal and aberrant infant development during the first two years. Both human and animal research are included. In addition to regular length research articles and brief reports (3000-word maximum), the journal includes solicited target articles along with a series of commentaries; debates, in which different theoretical positions are presented along with a series of commentaries; and thematic collections, a group of three to five reports or summaries of research on the same issue, conducted independently at different laboratories, with invited commentaries.