A Training System for Surgeons to Safely Introduce Robotic Colectomy Using a Real-Time Annotation Tool and Hybrid Surgery: Learning Curve Evaluation via Cumulative Sum Analysis

IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Susumu Inamoto, Akinari Nomura, Shota Tsukasaki, Tomoaki Okada, Seiichiro Kanaya, Yoshiharu Sakai
{"title":"A Training System for Surgeons to Safely Introduce Robotic Colectomy Using a Real-Time Annotation Tool and Hybrid Surgery: Learning Curve Evaluation via Cumulative Sum Analysis","authors":"Susumu Inamoto,&nbsp;Akinari Nomura,&nbsp;Shota Tsukasaki,&nbsp;Tomoaki Okada,&nbsp;Seiichiro Kanaya,&nbsp;Yoshiharu Sakai","doi":"10.1111/ases.70103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Robotic surgery has gained worldwide popularity due to its versatility and clinical benefits. However, issues associated with high costs, safety, specialized training requirements, and trainee education remain. Despite several preclinical training strategies, it is necessary to train while performing surgery in order to improve surgical technique. Since most institutions lack dual-console systems, alternative training strategies must be developed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>To enhance surgical training, a real-time annotation tool and hybrid surgery—where assistant surgeons actively utilize laparoscopic instruments—was implemented in trainee-performed colectomies. Short-term clinical outcomes were compared between robotic colectomies performed by proctors and those performed by trainees. Robotic colectomy learning curves were assessed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Between August 2021 and October 2024, 58 and 52 robotic colectomies were performed by proctors and trainee surgeons, respectively. Although no significant differences were observed in patient characteristics or clinical outcomes, operative time (265 vs. 343 min, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and console time (184 vs. 263.5 min, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) were significantly longer in the trainee group. CUSUM analysis indicated that proctors required 16 cases to reach the learning phase and 33 cases to achieve mastery. The trainee learning curve displayed a short bimodal pattern, which was distinctly separated in April 2024, corresponding to between-batch transition. This suggests that the real-time annotation tool and hybrid surgery effectively maintained surgical quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The combination of a real-time annotation tool and hybrid surgery represents a safe and effective training strategy for trainee surgeons performing robotic colectomy in a single-console institution.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.70103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Robotic surgery has gained worldwide popularity due to its versatility and clinical benefits. However, issues associated with high costs, safety, specialized training requirements, and trainee education remain. Despite several preclinical training strategies, it is necessary to train while performing surgery in order to improve surgical technique. Since most institutions lack dual-console systems, alternative training strategies must be developed.

Methods

To enhance surgical training, a real-time annotation tool and hybrid surgery—where assistant surgeons actively utilize laparoscopic instruments—was implemented in trainee-performed colectomies. Short-term clinical outcomes were compared between robotic colectomies performed by proctors and those performed by trainees. Robotic colectomy learning curves were assessed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.

Results

Between August 2021 and October 2024, 58 and 52 robotic colectomies were performed by proctors and trainee surgeons, respectively. Although no significant differences were observed in patient characteristics or clinical outcomes, operative time (265 vs. 343 min, p < 0.05) and console time (184 vs. 263.5 min, p < 0.05) were significantly longer in the trainee group. CUSUM analysis indicated that proctors required 16 cases to reach the learning phase and 33 cases to achieve mastery. The trainee learning curve displayed a short bimodal pattern, which was distinctly separated in April 2024, corresponding to between-batch transition. This suggests that the real-time annotation tool and hybrid surgery effectively maintained surgical quality.

Conclusion

The combination of a real-time annotation tool and hybrid surgery represents a safe and effective training strategy for trainee surgeons performing robotic colectomy in a single-console institution.

使用实时注释工具和混合手术的外科医生安全引入机器人结肠切除术的培训系统:通过累积和分析的学习曲线评估
机器人手术因其多功能性和临床效益而受到全世界的欢迎。然而,与高成本、安全、专业培训要求和培训生教育相关的问题仍然存在。尽管有几种临床前训练策略,但为了提高手术技术,在手术中进行训练是必要的。由于大多数机构缺乏双控制台系统,因此必须制定替代培训战略。方法为加强手术培训,在实习医师进行的结肠切除术中实施实时注释工具和混合手术,即助理医生积极使用腹腔镜器械。短期临床结果比较了监考人员和实习生进行的机器人结肠切除术。使用累积和(CUSUM)分析评估机器人结肠切除术的学习曲线。结果在2021年8月至2024年10月期间,监考医生和实习医生分别进行了58例和52例机器人结肠切除术。虽然在患者特征或临床结果上没有观察到显著差异,但在培训组中,手术时间(265 vs. 343 min, p < 0.05)和安慰时间(184 vs. 263.5 min, p < 0.05)明显更长。CUSUM分析表明,监考人员需要16个案例才能达到学习阶段,需要33个案例才能达到掌握阶段。学员学习曲线呈短双峰型,在2024年4月明显分离,对应于批间过渡。这说明实时标注工具和混合手术有效地保持了手术质量。结论实时注释工具与混合手术相结合,为在单控制台机构进行机器人结肠切除术的实习外科医生提供了一种安全有效的培训策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信