Legacies of #MeToo in the UK film and television industry: A qualitative study of workplace justice mechanisms to address sexual harassment

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES
Anna Bull
{"title":"Legacies of #MeToo in the UK film and television industry: A qualitative study of workplace justice mechanisms to address sexual harassment","authors":"Anna Bull","doi":"10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Workplace policy and practice in handling sexual harassment reports has been argued to have substantially shifted since #MeToo. However, within academic discussion on the #MeToo movement, the role of workplace justice mechanisms for preventing and responding to sexual harassment remains under-explored. Understanding the potential and pitfalls of these mechanisms requires hearing the perspectives of those who have attempted to navigate them. Therefore, this article analyses workers' perspectives of employer initiatives to prevent and respond to sexual harassment using a case study of the film and television industry, the sector at the centre of the 2017 #MeToo movement. It draws on analysis of interview data from 18 people working or studying in the UK film and television industry who had experienced and/or spoken up about sexual harassment and violence at work since December 2017. Interviewees' accounts of employer responses to sexual harassment disclosures reveal that action was only taken in a minority of cases, amidst a reliance on informal approaches for addressing this issue. In addition, interviewees described new risks including employees being encouraged to speak out about harassment and abuse but then being punished or victimised by employers when they do so. Furthermore, mechanisms for prevention and response to sexual harassment were still, according to interviewees, lacking in many workplaces.</div><div>Overall, amidst ongoing revelations of sexualised abuses of power within the industry, these findings reveal how the renewed focus on sexual harassment since #MeToo continues to shape industry practices and working conditions, even while this progress is contested and uneven.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47940,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies International Forum","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 103144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies International Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539525000937","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Workplace policy and practice in handling sexual harassment reports has been argued to have substantially shifted since #MeToo. However, within academic discussion on the #MeToo movement, the role of workplace justice mechanisms for preventing and responding to sexual harassment remains under-explored. Understanding the potential and pitfalls of these mechanisms requires hearing the perspectives of those who have attempted to navigate them. Therefore, this article analyses workers' perspectives of employer initiatives to prevent and respond to sexual harassment using a case study of the film and television industry, the sector at the centre of the 2017 #MeToo movement. It draws on analysis of interview data from 18 people working or studying in the UK film and television industry who had experienced and/or spoken up about sexual harassment and violence at work since December 2017. Interviewees' accounts of employer responses to sexual harassment disclosures reveal that action was only taken in a minority of cases, amidst a reliance on informal approaches for addressing this issue. In addition, interviewees described new risks including employees being encouraged to speak out about harassment and abuse but then being punished or victimised by employers when they do so. Furthermore, mechanisms for prevention and response to sexual harassment were still, according to interviewees, lacking in many workplaces.
Overall, amidst ongoing revelations of sexualised abuses of power within the industry, these findings reveal how the renewed focus on sexual harassment since #MeToo continues to shape industry practices and working conditions, even while this progress is contested and uneven.
#MeToo运动对英国影视产业的影响:一项针对职场性骚扰的司法机制的定性研究
人们认为,自#MeToo运动以来,职场处理性骚扰报告的政策和做法发生了重大变化。然而,在关于#MeToo运动的学术讨论中,工作场所司法机制在预防和应对性骚扰方面的作用仍未得到充分探讨。理解这些机制的潜力和缺陷需要听取那些试图驾驭它们的人的观点。因此,本文以电影和电视行业为例,分析了工人对雇主预防和应对性骚扰举措的看法。电影和电视行业是2017年#MeToo运动的中心。该报告分析了18位在英国影视行业工作或学习的人士的采访数据,这些人自2017年12月以来经历过或公开谈论过工作中的性骚扰和暴力。受访者对雇主对性骚扰披露的反应的描述表明,只有在少数情况下采取了行动,依靠非正式的方法来解决这个问题。此外,受访者还描述了新的风险,包括员工被鼓励说出骚扰和虐待,但当他们这样做时,他们会受到雇主的惩罚或成为受害者。此外,据受访者表示,许多工作场所仍然缺乏预防和应对性骚扰的机制。总的来说,在行业内不断曝光的性滥用权力中,这些发现揭示了自#MeToo以来对性骚扰的重新关注如何继续塑造行业惯例和工作条件,即使这一进展存在争议和不平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
63
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Studies International Forum (formerly Women"s Studies International Quarterly, established in 1978) is a bimonthly journal to aid the distribution and exchange of feminist research in the multidisciplinary, international area of women"s studies and in feminist research in other disciplines. The policy of the journal is to establish a feminist forum for discussion and debate. The journal seeks to critique and reconceptualize existing knowledge, to examine and re-evaluate the manner in which knowledge is produced and distributed, and to assess the implications this has for women"s lives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信