CT-based radiomics models for predicting spread through air space in lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Lihua Chen , Xiaosong Lan , Yao Huang , Junli Tao , Xuemei Huang , Yangfan Su , Daihong Liu , Xiangming Fang , Jiuquan Zhang
{"title":"CT-based radiomics models for predicting spread through air space in lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Lihua Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaosong Lan ,&nbsp;Yao Huang ,&nbsp;Junli Tao ,&nbsp;Xuemei Huang ,&nbsp;Yangfan Su ,&nbsp;Daihong Liu ,&nbsp;Xiangming Fang ,&nbsp;Jiuquan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and objectives</h3><div>Numerous studies have developed and validated models to predict spread through air space (STAS) in lung cancer using preoperative computed tomography (CT), yielding inconsistent results. We aimed to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of CT-based radiomics for predicting spread through air space (STAS) for preoperative prediction of lung cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Original studies published prior to January 2024 were searched in various databases. Only studies that used CT-based radiomics to preoperatively predict STAS in lung cancer patients were included. Two researchers independently extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. We estimated summary sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of CT-based radiomics for predicting STAS. A head-to-head comparison was performed to evaluate the efficacy of clinical and radiomics models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 17 studies with 6254 participants were included, and the methodological quality was found to be moderate. The <em>meta</em>-analysis comprised 26 datasets and achieved a pooled SEN of 0.82 (95 % CI: 0.78, 0.86), SPE of 0.76 (95 % CI: 0.72, 0.80), and AUC of 0.86 (95 % CI: 0.83, 0.89). In 11 pairwise comparison datasets, the radiomics model outperformed the clinical model with a higher AUC of 0.86 (95 % CI: 0.83, 0.89) compared to 0.80 (95 % CI: 0.76, 0.85), p &lt; 0.001.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Due to its moderate diagnostic accuracy, widespread use, and low cost, CT-based radiomics can be used to predict STAS in lung cancer preoperatively. However, further research is required in a large, multicentre, and prospective design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 112249"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25003353","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives

Numerous studies have developed and validated models to predict spread through air space (STAS) in lung cancer using preoperative computed tomography (CT), yielding inconsistent results. We aimed to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of CT-based radiomics for predicting spread through air space (STAS) for preoperative prediction of lung cancer.

Materials and methods

Original studies published prior to January 2024 were searched in various databases. Only studies that used CT-based radiomics to preoperatively predict STAS in lung cancer patients were included. Two researchers independently extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. We estimated summary sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of CT-based radiomics for predicting STAS. A head-to-head comparison was performed to evaluate the efficacy of clinical and radiomics models.

Results

A total of 17 studies with 6254 participants were included, and the methodological quality was found to be moderate. The meta-analysis comprised 26 datasets and achieved a pooled SEN of 0.82 (95 % CI: 0.78, 0.86), SPE of 0.76 (95 % CI: 0.72, 0.80), and AUC of 0.86 (95 % CI: 0.83, 0.89). In 11 pairwise comparison datasets, the radiomics model outperformed the clinical model with a higher AUC of 0.86 (95 % CI: 0.83, 0.89) compared to 0.80 (95 % CI: 0.76, 0.85), p < 0.001.

Conclusions

Due to its moderate diagnostic accuracy, widespread use, and low cost, CT-based radiomics can be used to predict STAS in lung cancer preoperatively. However, further research is required in a large, multicentre, and prospective design.
基于ct的放射组学模型预测肺癌通过空气传播:系统回顾和荟萃分析
大量研究已经开发并验证了使用术前计算机断层扫描(CT)预测肺癌通过空气空间(STAS)扩散的模型,但结果不一致。我们的目的是评估基于ct的放射组学在预测肺癌通过空气空间扩散(STAS)的术前预测中的诊断准确性。材料和方法检索2024年1月之前发表的原始研究。仅包括使用基于ct的放射组学来预测肺癌患者术前STAS的研究。两名研究人员独立提取数据并评估纳入研究的方法学质量。我们估计了基于ct的放射组学预测STAS的总灵敏度(SEN)、特异性(SPE)和接受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。进行了头对头比较,以评估临床和放射组学模型的疗效。结果共纳入17项研究,6254名受试者,方法学质量一般。meta分析包括26个数据集,合并SEN为0.82 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.86), SPE为0.76 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.80), AUC为0.86 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.89)。在11个两两比较数据集中,放射组学模型优于临床模型,AUC为0.86 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.89),高于0.80 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.85), p <;0.001.结论ct放射组学诊断准确率中等,应用广泛,成本低,可用于肺癌STAS的术前预测。然而,进一步的研究需要在一个大的,多中心的,前瞻性的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信