Safety and efficacy of empagliflozin in heart failure among patients with a history of valvular heart disease: Insights from EMPEROR-Pooled

Nitish K. Dhingra MD , Ekene Nwajei MD , Raj Verma MD , Egon Pfarr Dipl Stat , Tomasz Gasior MD , Subodh Verma MD
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of empagliflozin in heart failure among patients with a history of valvular heart disease: Insights from EMPEROR-Pooled","authors":"Nitish K. Dhingra MD ,&nbsp;Ekene Nwajei MD ,&nbsp;Raj Verma MD ,&nbsp;Egon Pfarr Dipl Stat ,&nbsp;Tomasz Gasior MD ,&nbsp;Subodh Verma MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.03.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Valvular heart disease (VHD)-associated heart failure (HF) remains an important and growing cause of morbidity and mortality. There are no contemporary data on the efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with a history of VHD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The EMPEROR-Pooled trial analyzed 9718 patients with HF who were enrolled in the randomized trials of empagliflozin versus placebo in HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HfrEF; EMPEROR-Reduced) and HF with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF; EMPEROR-Preserved). These trials evaluated a primary outcome of time to first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death. Here we analyze outcomes of the EMPEROR-Pooled patients according to the presence and etiology of VHD history.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 9717 patients enrolled in EMPEROR-Pooled with available data, 1484 (15.3%) had a history of VHD. Of the patients with VHD history, a history of isolated mitral disease (39.2%) was the most common subtype. In patients randomized to placebo, the risk of the primary outcome was higher among patients with VHD history (hazard ratio [HR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.53; <em>P</em> &lt; .01), and particularly those with a history of multivalvular disease (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.13-2.04; <em>P</em> &lt; .01) compared with no valvular disease. No heterogeneity was introduced by VHD history with respect to the efficacy of empagliflozin on all major clinical outcomes evaluated in EMPEROR-Pooled (<em>P</em><sub>interaction</sub> &gt; .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We present the first large analysis of SGLT2i (empagliflozin) use in HF patients by history of VHD. Although VHD history was associated with worse outcomes in HF patients, empagliflozin demonstrated consistent safety, efficacy, and patient-reported outcomes across all categories of VHD history.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"25 ","pages":"Pages 143-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273625000919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Valvular heart disease (VHD)-associated heart failure (HF) remains an important and growing cause of morbidity and mortality. There are no contemporary data on the efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with a history of VHD.

Methods

The EMPEROR-Pooled trial analyzed 9718 patients with HF who were enrolled in the randomized trials of empagliflozin versus placebo in HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HfrEF; EMPEROR-Reduced) and HF with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF; EMPEROR-Preserved). These trials evaluated a primary outcome of time to first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death. Here we analyze outcomes of the EMPEROR-Pooled patients according to the presence and etiology of VHD history.

Results

Of the 9717 patients enrolled in EMPEROR-Pooled with available data, 1484 (15.3%) had a history of VHD. Of the patients with VHD history, a history of isolated mitral disease (39.2%) was the most common subtype. In patients randomized to placebo, the risk of the primary outcome was higher among patients with VHD history (hazard ratio [HR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.53; P < .01), and particularly those with a history of multivalvular disease (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.13-2.04; P < .01) compared with no valvular disease. No heterogeneity was introduced by VHD history with respect to the efficacy of empagliflozin on all major clinical outcomes evaluated in EMPEROR-Pooled (Pinteraction > .05).

Conclusions

We present the first large analysis of SGLT2i (empagliflozin) use in HF patients by history of VHD. Although VHD history was associated with worse outcomes in HF patients, empagliflozin demonstrated consistent safety, efficacy, and patient-reported outcomes across all categories of VHD history.
恩格列净治疗有瓣膜性心脏病患者心力衰竭的安全性和有效性:来自EMPEROR-Pooled的见解
背景:瓣膜性心脏病(VHD)相关心力衰竭(HF)仍然是发病率和死亡率的一个重要且日益增长的原因。目前还没有关于SGLT2抑制剂在有VHD病史的患者中的有效性和安全性的数据。方法:EMPEROR-Pooled试验分析了9718例HF患者,这些患者参加了恩格列净与安慰剂在左室射血分数降低(HfrEF;保留左心室射血分数(HFpEF;EMPEROR-Preserved)。这些试验评估了首次心衰住院时间或心血管死亡的主要结局。在这里,我们根据VHD病史的存在和病因分析EMPEROR-Pooled患者的结果。结果在9717例纳入EMPEROR-Pooled的患者中,1484例(15.3%)有VHD病史。在有VHD病史的患者中,分离性二尖瓣疾病史(39.2%)是最常见的亚型。在随机分配到安慰剂组的患者中,有VHD病史的患者出现主要结局的风险更高(风险比[HR], 1.30;95%置信区间[CI], 1.10-1.53;P & lt;0.01),特别是那些有多瓣膜疾病史的人(HR, 1.51;95% ci, 1.13-2.04;P & lt;.01),与无瓣膜病者比较。在EMPEROR-Pooled (p - interaction >;)评估的所有主要临床结果中,关于恩格列净的疗效,VHD病史没有引入异质性。. 05)。我们提出了第一个根据VHD病史分析HF患者使用SGLT2i(恩格列净)的大型分析。尽管VHD病史与HF患者较差的预后相关,但恩格列净在所有VHD病史中表现出一致的安全性、有效性和患者报告的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信