Implementation of a multi-component alcohol policy in Ireland: A qualitative study exploring barriers and facilitators to implementation

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Susan Calnan , Karen Matvienko-Sikar , Niamh Fitzgerald , Sheila Gilheany , Zubair Kabir
{"title":"Implementation of a multi-component alcohol policy in Ireland: A qualitative study exploring barriers and facilitators to implementation","authors":"Susan Calnan ,&nbsp;Karen Matvienko-Sikar ,&nbsp;Niamh Fitzgerald ,&nbsp;Sheila Gilheany ,&nbsp;Zubair Kabir","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In Ireland, the Public Health (Alcohol) Act represents the first Irish policy attempt to address alcohol harms through an explicitly public health approach. Lauded internationally, the Act aligns with ‘best buy’ policy recommendations, encompassing a suite of measures targeting the pricing, visibility, advertising and health labelling of alcohol products. Recognising the importance of implementation in the policy process, this study sought to examine the implementation of this multi-component alcohol policy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted 15 qualitative interviews with a range of participants with direct knowledge or experience of implementing the Public Health (Alcohol) Act. Participants included policy stakeholders, private sector implementation actors and public health/alcohol policy experts. In the analysis, we used the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to map barriers and facilitators to implementation of this policy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study found that barriers and facilitators to implementation were reported for all five domains of CFIR across 21 constructs. Private sector actors placed a greater emphasis on cost-related factors as perceived barriers, whereas policy stakeholders and public health policy experts underlined the reported persistence of industry lobbying as a barrier. All categories of participant perceived a lack of planning for both implementation and policy evaluation, a dearth of resources for inner setting actors and a lack of high-level leadership during policy implementation. Participants also noted the complexity of implementation, lack of relational connections and gaps in innovation design as barriers to implementation. Facilitators included the reported expertise of and relational connections with key individuals, and the policy’s alignment with international ‘best buy’ policy recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Given the range of challenges perceived in implementing this comprehensive alcohol policy, our study underlines the need for strategic implementation planning, for ongoing evaluation and monitoring of the policy measures, and for adequate resourcing of inner setting actors. The study also notes the importance of anticipating and planning for continued industry lobbying during the implementation phase, acknowledging the reality of the “politics of implementation”.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 104870"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925001707","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In Ireland, the Public Health (Alcohol) Act represents the first Irish policy attempt to address alcohol harms through an explicitly public health approach. Lauded internationally, the Act aligns with ‘best buy’ policy recommendations, encompassing a suite of measures targeting the pricing, visibility, advertising and health labelling of alcohol products. Recognising the importance of implementation in the policy process, this study sought to examine the implementation of this multi-component alcohol policy.

Methods

We conducted 15 qualitative interviews with a range of participants with direct knowledge or experience of implementing the Public Health (Alcohol) Act. Participants included policy stakeholders, private sector implementation actors and public health/alcohol policy experts. In the analysis, we used the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to map barriers and facilitators to implementation of this policy.

Results

The study found that barriers and facilitators to implementation were reported for all five domains of CFIR across 21 constructs. Private sector actors placed a greater emphasis on cost-related factors as perceived barriers, whereas policy stakeholders and public health policy experts underlined the reported persistence of industry lobbying as a barrier. All categories of participant perceived a lack of planning for both implementation and policy evaluation, a dearth of resources for inner setting actors and a lack of high-level leadership during policy implementation. Participants also noted the complexity of implementation, lack of relational connections and gaps in innovation design as barriers to implementation. Facilitators included the reported expertise of and relational connections with key individuals, and the policy’s alignment with international ‘best buy’ policy recommendations.

Conclusions

Given the range of challenges perceived in implementing this comprehensive alcohol policy, our study underlines the need for strategic implementation planning, for ongoing evaluation and monitoring of the policy measures, and for adequate resourcing of inner setting actors. The study also notes the importance of anticipating and planning for continued industry lobbying during the implementation phase, acknowledging the reality of the “politics of implementation”.
爱尔兰多成分酒精政策的实施:一项探讨实施障碍和促进因素的定性研究
在爱尔兰,《公共卫生(酒精)法》是爱尔兰首次尝试通过明确的公共卫生方法解决酒精危害的政策。该法案在国际上受到称赞,符合“最合买”政策建议,包括针对酒精产品的定价、知名度、广告和健康标签的一系列措施。认识到执行在政策过程中的重要性,本研究试图审查这一多成分酒精政策的执行情况。方法:我们对一系列具有执行《公共卫生(酒精)法》直接知识或经验的参与者进行了15次定性访谈。与会者包括政策利益攸关方、私营部门执行行为者和公共卫生/酒精政策专家。在分析中,我们使用了更新的实施研究综合框架(CFIR)来绘制该政策实施的障碍和促进因素。结果研究发现,在21个结构中,报告了CFIR的所有五个领域的实施障碍和促进因素。私营部门行为者更加强调与成本有关的因素是可感知的障碍,而政策利益攸关方和公共卫生政策专家则强调,据报告,行业游说持续存在是一种障碍。所有类别的与会者都认为缺乏对执行和政策评价的规划,缺乏内部设定行动者的资源,以及在政策执行期间缺乏高层领导。与会者还指出,实施的复杂性、缺乏关系联系和创新设计方面的差距是实施的障碍。促进因素包括报告的专业知识和与关键人物的关系,以及该政策与国际“最合算”政策建议的一致性。鉴于实施这一全面的酒精政策所面临的一系列挑战,我们的研究强调有必要制定战略实施计划,对政策措施进行持续评估和监测,并为内部环境行动者提供充足的资源。该研究还指出了在实施阶段预测和规划持续的行业游说的重要性,承认了“实施政治”的现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信