{"title":"Implementation of a multi-component alcohol policy in Ireland: A qualitative study exploring barriers and facilitators to implementation","authors":"Susan Calnan , Karen Matvienko-Sikar , Niamh Fitzgerald , Sheila Gilheany , Zubair Kabir","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In Ireland, the Public Health (Alcohol) Act represents the first Irish policy attempt to address alcohol harms through an explicitly public health approach. Lauded internationally, the Act aligns with ‘best buy’ policy recommendations, encompassing a suite of measures targeting the pricing, visibility, advertising and health labelling of alcohol products. Recognising the importance of implementation in the policy process, this study sought to examine the implementation of this multi-component alcohol policy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted 15 qualitative interviews with a range of participants with direct knowledge or experience of implementing the Public Health (Alcohol) Act. Participants included policy stakeholders, private sector implementation actors and public health/alcohol policy experts. In the analysis, we used the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to map barriers and facilitators to implementation of this policy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study found that barriers and facilitators to implementation were reported for all five domains of CFIR across 21 constructs. Private sector actors placed a greater emphasis on cost-related factors as perceived barriers, whereas policy stakeholders and public health policy experts underlined the reported persistence of industry lobbying as a barrier. All categories of participant perceived a lack of planning for both implementation and policy evaluation, a dearth of resources for inner setting actors and a lack of high-level leadership during policy implementation. Participants also noted the complexity of implementation, lack of relational connections and gaps in innovation design as barriers to implementation. Facilitators included the reported expertise of and relational connections with key individuals, and the policy’s alignment with international ‘best buy’ policy recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Given the range of challenges perceived in implementing this comprehensive alcohol policy, our study underlines the need for strategic implementation planning, for ongoing evaluation and monitoring of the policy measures, and for adequate resourcing of inner setting actors. The study also notes the importance of anticipating and planning for continued industry lobbying during the implementation phase, acknowledging the reality of the “politics of implementation”.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 104870"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925001707","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
In Ireland, the Public Health (Alcohol) Act represents the first Irish policy attempt to address alcohol harms through an explicitly public health approach. Lauded internationally, the Act aligns with ‘best buy’ policy recommendations, encompassing a suite of measures targeting the pricing, visibility, advertising and health labelling of alcohol products. Recognising the importance of implementation in the policy process, this study sought to examine the implementation of this multi-component alcohol policy.
Methods
We conducted 15 qualitative interviews with a range of participants with direct knowledge or experience of implementing the Public Health (Alcohol) Act. Participants included policy stakeholders, private sector implementation actors and public health/alcohol policy experts. In the analysis, we used the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to map barriers and facilitators to implementation of this policy.
Results
The study found that barriers and facilitators to implementation were reported for all five domains of CFIR across 21 constructs. Private sector actors placed a greater emphasis on cost-related factors as perceived barriers, whereas policy stakeholders and public health policy experts underlined the reported persistence of industry lobbying as a barrier. All categories of participant perceived a lack of planning for both implementation and policy evaluation, a dearth of resources for inner setting actors and a lack of high-level leadership during policy implementation. Participants also noted the complexity of implementation, lack of relational connections and gaps in innovation design as barriers to implementation. Facilitators included the reported expertise of and relational connections with key individuals, and the policy’s alignment with international ‘best buy’ policy recommendations.
Conclusions
Given the range of challenges perceived in implementing this comprehensive alcohol policy, our study underlines the need for strategic implementation planning, for ongoing evaluation and monitoring of the policy measures, and for adequate resourcing of inner setting actors. The study also notes the importance of anticipating and planning for continued industry lobbying during the implementation phase, acknowledging the reality of the “politics of implementation”.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.