Association between timing of angiotensin II administration and outcomes in vasoplegia after cardiac surgery

Travis J. Miles MD , Michael T. Guinn MD, PhD , Orlando R. Suero MD , Todd K. Rosengart MD , Marc R. Moon MD , Joseph S. Coselli MD , Ravi K. Ghanta MD , Subhasis Chatterjee MD
{"title":"Association between timing of angiotensin II administration and outcomes in vasoplegia after cardiac surgery","authors":"Travis J. Miles MD ,&nbsp;Michael T. Guinn MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Orlando R. Suero MD ,&nbsp;Todd K. Rosengart MD ,&nbsp;Marc R. Moon MD ,&nbsp;Joseph S. Coselli MD ,&nbsp;Ravi K. Ghanta MD ,&nbsp;Subhasis Chatterjee MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Vasoplegic shock after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a highly morbid condition. The novel vasopressor angiotensin II is increasingly being used for catecholamine-resistant vasoplegia. Although early intervention with adjunctive therapies such as methylene blue can improve outcomes of vasoplegia, the optimal timing for escalation with angiotensin II is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Pharmacologic data were extracted from electronic health records for patients who underwent surgery with CPB during 2017-2022. Patients were identified who received angiotensin II intraoperatively or postoperatively (ie, early or late). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the risk-adjusted effects of earlier angiotensin II administration on postoperative major adverse events: mortality and major morbidity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventy (1.4%) patients received angiotensin II for vasoplegia. The median [interquartile range] vasopressor dose at time of angiotensin II initiation was 0.33 [0.26-0.48] norepinephrine equivalents. Vasoplegia requiring treatment with angiotensin II was associated with substantial mortality (42.9% vs 3.3%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and major morbidity (81.4% vs 20.3%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). The 51.4% of patients who began receiving angiotensin II intraoperatively had less major morbidity (94.1% vs 69.4%, <em>P</em> = .019) and a trend toward lower mortality (30.6% vs 55.9%, <em>P</em> = .057) than patients who received it postoperatively. In multivariable logistic regression, intraoperative initiation was an independent predictor of fewer major adverse events (odds ratio, 0.037; 95% confidence interval, 0.004-0.393).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Morbidity and mortality rates are high in patients given angiotensin II for vasoplegia. Initiating this medication intraoperatively may improve outcomes, underscoring the importance of early intervention for patients at risk for vasoplegia after CPB.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"25 ","pages":"Pages 280-293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273625001445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Vasoplegic shock after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a highly morbid condition. The novel vasopressor angiotensin II is increasingly being used for catecholamine-resistant vasoplegia. Although early intervention with adjunctive therapies such as methylene blue can improve outcomes of vasoplegia, the optimal timing for escalation with angiotensin II is unknown.

Methods

Pharmacologic data were extracted from electronic health records for patients who underwent surgery with CPB during 2017-2022. Patients were identified who received angiotensin II intraoperatively or postoperatively (ie, early or late). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the risk-adjusted effects of earlier angiotensin II administration on postoperative major adverse events: mortality and major morbidity.

Results

Seventy (1.4%) patients received angiotensin II for vasoplegia. The median [interquartile range] vasopressor dose at time of angiotensin II initiation was 0.33 [0.26-0.48] norepinephrine equivalents. Vasoplegia requiring treatment with angiotensin II was associated with substantial mortality (42.9% vs 3.3%, P < .001) and major morbidity (81.4% vs 20.3%, P < .001). The 51.4% of patients who began receiving angiotensin II intraoperatively had less major morbidity (94.1% vs 69.4%, P = .019) and a trend toward lower mortality (30.6% vs 55.9%, P = .057) than patients who received it postoperatively. In multivariable logistic regression, intraoperative initiation was an independent predictor of fewer major adverse events (odds ratio, 0.037; 95% confidence interval, 0.004-0.393).

Conclusions

Morbidity and mortality rates are high in patients given angiotensin II for vasoplegia. Initiating this medication intraoperatively may improve outcomes, underscoring the importance of early intervention for patients at risk for vasoplegia after CPB.

Abstract Image

血管紧张素II给药时机与心脏手术后血管截瘫预后的关系
目的体外循环(CPB)后截瘫性休克是一种高发病率的疾病。新型血管加压素血管紧张素II越来越多地被用于儿茶酚胺抵抗性血管麻痹。虽然早期干预辅助治疗如亚甲基蓝可以改善血管截瘫的预后,但血管紧张素II升级的最佳时机尚不清楚。方法从2017-2022年接受CPB手术患者的电子健康记录中提取药理学数据。确定术中或术后(即早期或晚期)接受血管紧张素II治疗的患者。采用多变量logistic回归来确定早期给药血管紧张素II对术后主要不良事件(死亡率和主要发病率)的风险调整效应。结果70例(1.4%)患者接受血管紧张素II治疗。血管紧张素II起始时的血管加压剂剂量中位数[四分位数范围]为0.33[0.26-0.48]去甲肾上腺素当量。需要血管紧张素II治疗的血管截瘫与大量死亡率相关(42.9% vs 3.3%, P <;.001)和主要发病率(81.4% vs 20.3%, P <;措施)。术中开始接受血管紧张素II治疗的患者中有51.4%的患者比术后接受血管紧张素II治疗的患者有更低的主要发病率(94.1%对69.4%,P = 0.019)和更低的死亡率(30.6%对55.9%,P = 0.057)。在多变量logistic回归中,术中起始是较少主要不良事件的独立预测因子(优势比,0.037;95%置信区间为0.004-0.393)。结论血管紧张素治疗血管截瘫患者的发病率和死亡率较高。术中开始使用这种药物可能改善预后,强调早期干预对CPB后有血管截瘫风险的患者的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信