Impact of pretransplant extracorporeal membrane oxygen support duration on lung transplant outcomes: United Network for Organ Sharing analysis

IF 1.9
Harpreet Singh Grewal MD , Luke Benvenuto MD , Kemarut Laothamatas MD , Angela Dimango MD , Hilary Robbins MD , Lori Shah MD , Gabriela Magda MD , Ritesh Shreenidhi MS , Sneha Dahiya MS , Joseph Costa DHSc, PA-C , Bryan Stanifer MD, MPH , Joshua Sonett MD , Frank D'Ovidio MD, PhD , Philippe Lemaitre MD, PhD , Selim Arcasoy MD, MPH
{"title":"Impact of pretransplant extracorporeal membrane oxygen support duration on lung transplant outcomes: United Network for Organ Sharing analysis","authors":"Harpreet Singh Grewal MD ,&nbsp;Luke Benvenuto MD ,&nbsp;Kemarut Laothamatas MD ,&nbsp;Angela Dimango MD ,&nbsp;Hilary Robbins MD ,&nbsp;Lori Shah MD ,&nbsp;Gabriela Magda MD ,&nbsp;Ritesh Shreenidhi MS ,&nbsp;Sneha Dahiya MS ,&nbsp;Joseph Costa DHSc, PA-C ,&nbsp;Bryan Stanifer MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Joshua Sonett MD ,&nbsp;Frank D'Ovidio MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Philippe Lemaitre MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Selim Arcasoy MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The use of pretransplant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) continues to increase. In the most recent Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients, 11% of listed candidates for lung transplantation were on ECMO. We evaluated the impact of the duration of ECMO bridge to transplantation on posttransplant outcomes using United Network for Organ Sharing data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective cohort study from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, to include pre−COVID-19 pandemic data. Patients were grouped into quartiles on the basis of duration of ECMO support (&lt;4, 4-8, 9-17, and &gt;17 days). The primary outcome was survival at 1 year after transplantation. Secondary outcomes included length of stay from transplant to discharge, 1-month survival, 6-month survival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 489 patients were analyzed. Median age decreased over the quartiles (quartile 1 age 55 vs quartile 4 age 37; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). The proportion of patients who were ambulatory on ECMO support increased over the quartiles (quartile 1 was 23.85% vs quartile 4 was 63.87%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Survival at 1 year was not different among the quartiles after adjusting for lung allocation score, body mass index, gender, ambulatory status, type of lung transplant, and creatinine. Six-month survival was reduced in the patients on prolonged ECMO support (quartiles 3 and 4). Ambulatory status, creatinine, and body mass index were significant contributors to survival at 1 year in the adjusted analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Duration of pretransplant ECMO bridge to transplantation appears to impact 6-month survival in patients who were on ECMO for 9 days or longer, but duration of ECMO support does not appear to negatively impact postlung transplant survival during the first year or length of stay from transplant to discharge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"25 ","pages":"Pages 466-473"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273625000841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The use of pretransplant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) continues to increase. In the most recent Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients, 11% of listed candidates for lung transplantation were on ECMO. We evaluated the impact of the duration of ECMO bridge to transplantation on posttransplant outcomes using United Network for Organ Sharing data.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, to include pre−COVID-19 pandemic data. Patients were grouped into quartiles on the basis of duration of ECMO support (<4, 4-8, 9-17, and >17 days). The primary outcome was survival at 1 year after transplantation. Secondary outcomes included length of stay from transplant to discharge, 1-month survival, 6-month survival.

Results

In total, 489 patients were analyzed. Median age decreased over the quartiles (quartile 1 age 55 vs quartile 4 age 37; P < .001). The proportion of patients who were ambulatory on ECMO support increased over the quartiles (quartile 1 was 23.85% vs quartile 4 was 63.87%; P < .001). Survival at 1 year was not different among the quartiles after adjusting for lung allocation score, body mass index, gender, ambulatory status, type of lung transplant, and creatinine. Six-month survival was reduced in the patients on prolonged ECMO support (quartiles 3 and 4). Ambulatory status, creatinine, and body mass index were significant contributors to survival at 1 year in the adjusted analysis.

Conclusions

Duration of pretransplant ECMO bridge to transplantation appears to impact 6-month survival in patients who were on ECMO for 9 days or longer, but duration of ECMO support does not appear to negatively impact postlung transplant survival during the first year or length of stay from transplant to discharge.
移植前体外膜氧支持时间对肺移植结果的影响:器官共享分析联合网络
目的移植前体外膜氧合(ECMO)的应用日益增多。在最近的移植接受者科学登记中,11%的肺移植候选患者接受了体外膜肺氧合。我们使用联合器官共享数据网络评估ECMO过渡到移植的持续时间对移植后结果的影响。方法对2015年1月1日至2019年12月31日的病例进行回顾性队列研究,纳入了COVID-19大流行前的数据。根据ECMO支持时间(4、4-8、9-17和17天)将患者分为四分位数。主要终点是移植后1年的生存率。次要结局包括从移植到出院的住院时间、1个月生存率、6个月生存率。结果共分析489例患者。中位年龄在四分位数内下降(四分位数1为55岁vs四分位数4为37岁;P & lt;措施)。在ECMO支持下走动的患者比例在四分位数中有所增加(四分位数1为23.85%,四分位数4为63.87%;P & lt;措施)。在调整肺分配评分、体重指数、性别、流动状态、肺移植类型和肌酐后,1年生存率在四分位数之间没有差异。延长ECMO支持的患者6个月生存率降低(四分位数3和4)。在调整后的分析中,动态状态、肌酐和体重指数是影响1年生存率的重要因素。结论:移植前ECMO桥接时间对接受ECMO 9天或更长时间的患者6个月生存率有影响,但ECMO支持时间对肺移植后第一年的生存率或从移植到出院的住院时间没有负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信