Requirements for biventricular repair after bilateral pulmonary artery banding for patients with borderline left ventricle

Dai Asada MD, PhD , Yoichiro Ishii MD, PhD , Takuya Fujisaki MD , Masayoshi Mori MD , Kumiyo Matsuo MD , Hisaaki Aoki MD, PhD , Sanae Tsumura MD, PhD , Futoshi Kayatani MD
{"title":"Requirements for biventricular repair after bilateral pulmonary artery banding for patients with borderline left ventricle","authors":"Dai Asada MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yoichiro Ishii MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takuya Fujisaki MD ,&nbsp;Masayoshi Mori MD ,&nbsp;Kumiyo Matsuo MD ,&nbsp;Hisaaki Aoki MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sanae Tsumura MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Futoshi Kayatani MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.03.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study objective was to examine factors associated with the decision to perform biventricular repair or univentricular repair in patients with left heart obstructive diseases after bilateral pulmonary artery banding.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective study, we used data from an institutional database. In total, 12 patients who underwent univentricular repair (group U) and 18 patients who underwent biventricular repair (group B) were included in the analysis. Left heart obstructive diseases included critical aortic stenosis, coarctation complex, interruption of aortic arch, and hypoplastic left heart complex. The Z-scores of the mitral, aortic, tricuspid, and pulmonary valve diameters, along with other parameters, were compared before and after bilateral pulmonary artery banding. Three months after the initial bilateral pulmonary artery banding, a cardiac catheter examination was performed in all patients to determine whether univentricular repair or biventricular repair should be performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mitral valve size in group B was significantly larger than in group U both before (−0.27 ± 1.04 vs −2.25 ± 1.83, <em>P &lt;</em> .01) and after bilateral pulmonary artery banding (0.05 ± 1.58 vs −1.86 ± 1.91, <em>P &lt;</em> .01). In group U, mitral and aortic valve sizes showed no significant increase after bilateral pulmonary artery banding. In group B, mitral valve size showed no significant increase after bilateral pulmonary artery banding (−0.27 ± 1.04 vs 0.06 ± 1.58, <em>P =</em> .26), whereas aortic valve size demonstrated a significant increase (−4.33 ± 2.60 vs −3.13 ± 2.64, <em>P =</em> .02).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In cases of a “borderline” left ventricle, a large mitral valve from birth and growth of the aortic valve are crucial for successful biventricular repair. Three months after bilateral pulmonary artery banding is considered the appropriate time to decide the management course to be pursued.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"25 ","pages":"Pages 326-331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273625000920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The study objective was to examine factors associated with the decision to perform biventricular repair or univentricular repair in patients with left heart obstructive diseases after bilateral pulmonary artery banding.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we used data from an institutional database. In total, 12 patients who underwent univentricular repair (group U) and 18 patients who underwent biventricular repair (group B) were included in the analysis. Left heart obstructive diseases included critical aortic stenosis, coarctation complex, interruption of aortic arch, and hypoplastic left heart complex. The Z-scores of the mitral, aortic, tricuspid, and pulmonary valve diameters, along with other parameters, were compared before and after bilateral pulmonary artery banding. Three months after the initial bilateral pulmonary artery banding, a cardiac catheter examination was performed in all patients to determine whether univentricular repair or biventricular repair should be performed.

Results

Mitral valve size in group B was significantly larger than in group U both before (−0.27 ± 1.04 vs −2.25 ± 1.83, P < .01) and after bilateral pulmonary artery banding (0.05 ± 1.58 vs −1.86 ± 1.91, P < .01). In group U, mitral and aortic valve sizes showed no significant increase after bilateral pulmonary artery banding. In group B, mitral valve size showed no significant increase after bilateral pulmonary artery banding (−0.27 ± 1.04 vs 0.06 ± 1.58, P = .26), whereas aortic valve size demonstrated a significant increase (−4.33 ± 2.60 vs −3.13 ± 2.64, P = .02).

Conclusions

In cases of a “borderline” left ventricle, a large mitral valve from birth and growth of the aortic valve are crucial for successful biventricular repair. Three months after bilateral pulmonary artery banding is considered the appropriate time to decide the management course to be pursued.
边缘性左心室患者双侧肺动脉绑扎术后双心室修复的要求
目的:探讨影响左心阻塞性疾病患者在双侧肺动脉绑扎术后选择双心室修复还是单心室修复的相关因素。方法在这项回顾性研究中,我们使用了来自机构数据库的数据。共纳入12例单心室修复组(U组)和18例双心室修复组(B组)。左心梗阻性疾病包括严重主动脉狭窄、缩窄复合体、主动脉弓中断和左心复合体发育不良。比较双侧肺动脉束带前后二尖瓣、主动脉瓣、三尖瓣和肺动脉瓣直径的z评分及其他参数。在初次双侧肺动脉绑扎术3个月后,所有患者均行心导管检查,以确定是否应进行单心室修复或双心室修复。结果B组二尖瓣大小均明显大于U组(- 0.27±1.04 vs - 2.25±1.83,P <;(0.05±1.58 vs - 1.86±1.91,P <;. 01)。U组双侧肺动脉束带后二尖瓣和主动脉瓣大小无明显增加。B组双侧肺动脉夹带后二尖瓣大小无显著增加(- 0.27±1.04 vs - 0.06±1.58,P = 0.26),主动脉瓣大小有显著增加(- 4.33±2.60 vs - 3.13±2.64,P = 0.02)。结论对于边缘性左心室,出生时的大二尖瓣和主动脉瓣的生长是双心室修复成功的关键。双侧肺动脉绑扎术后3个月被认为是决定治疗方案的合适时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信