Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing Has Limited Ability to Prevent Surgical Site Infection Following Operative Fixation of Extremity and Pelvic Fractures.

Michael C Willey,Joan N Hebden,Loreen A Herwaldt,Greg E Gaski,Sara Kheiri,Lyndsay M O'Hara,Nathan N O'Hara,Sheila Sprague,Sofia Bzovsky,Mark J Gage,Gerard P Slobogean,
{"title":"Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing Has Limited Ability to Prevent Surgical Site Infection Following Operative Fixation of Extremity and Pelvic Fractures.","authors":"Michael C Willey,Joan N Hebden,Loreen A Herwaldt,Greg E Gaski,Sara Kheiri,Lyndsay M O'Hara,Nathan N O'Hara,Sheila Sprague,Sofia Bzovsky,Mark J Gage,Gerard P Slobogean,","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.01224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nA preoperative chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bath is used to reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) in elective surgery, but its efficacy in the trauma setting is unknown. We compared the incidence of SSI between patients who did versus did not receive a CHG bath before operative fixation of extremity and/or pelvic fractures.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a secondary analysis of the PREP-IT cluster-randomized crossover trials that enrolled patients undergoing operative treatment for open or closed extremity or pelvic fractures. Preoperative CHG bathing (yes or no) was recorded for each patient per study protocol. The association between CHG bathing and SSI within 90 days after definitive fracture surgery was assessed. We performed multivariable regression to adjust for prognostic variables. We also conducted a separate instrumental variable analysis to compare SSI rates between study sites that used CHG bathing for >90% of participants and those that used CHG bathing for <1% of participants.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf the 10,103 participants (mean age, 51 ± 20 years; 47% female; 77% White; 17% Black; 4% Asian; 7% Hispanic) included in the analysis, 2,674 (26%) had a documented preoperative CHG bath and 7,429 (74%) did not. CHG bathing was not associated with a significant reduction in the odds of 90-day SSI in the multivariable (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86 to 1.32; p = 0.56) or instrumental variable (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.25; p = 0.48) analyses.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nAmong adult patients who underwent extremity or pelvic fracture surgery, preoperative CHG bathing was not associated with a significant reduction in SSI.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nTherapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"89 1","pages":"36-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.01224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND A preoperative chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bath is used to reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) in elective surgery, but its efficacy in the trauma setting is unknown. We compared the incidence of SSI between patients who did versus did not receive a CHG bath before operative fixation of extremity and/or pelvic fractures. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of the PREP-IT cluster-randomized crossover trials that enrolled patients undergoing operative treatment for open or closed extremity or pelvic fractures. Preoperative CHG bathing (yes or no) was recorded for each patient per study protocol. The association between CHG bathing and SSI within 90 days after definitive fracture surgery was assessed. We performed multivariable regression to adjust for prognostic variables. We also conducted a separate instrumental variable analysis to compare SSI rates between study sites that used CHG bathing for >90% of participants and those that used CHG bathing for <1% of participants. RESULTS Of the 10,103 participants (mean age, 51 ± 20 years; 47% female; 77% White; 17% Black; 4% Asian; 7% Hispanic) included in the analysis, 2,674 (26%) had a documented preoperative CHG bath and 7,429 (74%) did not. CHG bathing was not associated with a significant reduction in the odds of 90-day SSI in the multivariable (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86 to 1.32; p = 0.56) or instrumental variable (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.25; p = 0.48) analyses. CONCLUSIONS Among adult patients who underwent extremity or pelvic fracture surgery, preoperative CHG bathing was not associated with a significant reduction in SSI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
葡萄糖酸氯己定沐浴预防四肢和骨盆骨折手术固定后手术部位感染的能力有限。
背景:术前葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)洗液用于择期手术中降低手术部位感染(SSI)的风险,但其在创伤情况下的疗效尚不清楚。我们比较了在四肢和/或骨盆骨折手术固定前接受CHG浴和未接受CHG浴的患者之间SSI的发生率。方法:我们对PREP-IT集群随机交叉试验进行了二次分析,这些试验纳入了开放性或闭合性四肢或骨盆骨折接受手术治疗的患者。每个研究方案记录每位患者术前CHG沐浴(是或否)。评估明确骨折术后90天内CHG沐浴与SSI之间的关系。我们进行了多变量回归来调整预后变量。我们还进行了单独的工具变量分析,以比较使用CHG沐浴的研究地点与使用CHG沐浴的研究地点之间的SSI率。结果10103名参与者(平均年龄51±20岁;47%的女性;77%的白人;17%是黑人;亚洲的4%;7%西班牙裔)纳入分析,2674例(26%)术前有CHG浴记录,7429例(74%)没有。在多变量中,CHG沐浴与90天SSI几率的显著降低无关(优势比[OR], 1.07;95%置信区间[CI], 0.86 ~ 1.32;p = 0.56)或工具变量(or, 0.88;95% CI, 0.62 ~ 1.25;P = 0.48)分析。结论:在接受四肢或骨盆骨折手术的成年患者中,术前CHG沐浴与SSI的显著降低无关。证据水平:治疗性三级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信