CRISPR for Cystic Fibrosis: advances and insights from a systematic review.

IF 12 1区 医学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Lucia Nicosia,Patrick T Harrison
{"title":"CRISPR for Cystic Fibrosis: advances and insights from a systematic review.","authors":"Lucia Nicosia,Patrick T Harrison","doi":"10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.06.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is a severe genetic disorder caused by loss-of-function mutations in the CFTR gene. Gene editing approaches have the potential to correct such mutations. This systematic review outlines the mechanisms of the main CRISPR-based technologies, and, through cross-study comparisons, analyzes twenty-seven research articles that applied these technologies to target CF-causing variants. We report and discuss the strategy design, target cell selection, editing efficiency, prevalence of editing byproducts and levels of CFTR functional restoration achieved in each work, with the aim of providing technical insights for further exploration of CRISPR-based gene editing approaches. Our findings show that the F508del and W1282X mutations were the most extensively studied CF-causing variants, though over fifteen mutations were targeted overall. The majority of works under review explored the use of homology-directed repair (HDR) or base editing, with a growing number reporting efficient prime editing. Some studies tackled multiple individual mutations, compared different editors, or tested strategies across various models, while others focused on approaches that rescue CFTR function without directly correcting a mutation. Several works also proposed strategies that could address multiple variants with a single approach, while others highlighted technical difficulties in editing certain regions of the CFTR gene. This cross-study comparison also emphasizes the need for standardized reporting of editing efficiency and functional rescue, and stresses the importance of further single-cell RNA sequencing and in-vivo studies to reach clinically-relevant conclusions. However, as gene editing techniques continue to evolve, and with over sixty ongoing CRISPR-based clinical trials, there is growing optimism for meaningful advancements in CF gene-editing therapeutics.","PeriodicalId":19020,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Therapy","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.06.021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is a severe genetic disorder caused by loss-of-function mutations in the CFTR gene. Gene editing approaches have the potential to correct such mutations. This systematic review outlines the mechanisms of the main CRISPR-based technologies, and, through cross-study comparisons, analyzes twenty-seven research articles that applied these technologies to target CF-causing variants. We report and discuss the strategy design, target cell selection, editing efficiency, prevalence of editing byproducts and levels of CFTR functional restoration achieved in each work, with the aim of providing technical insights for further exploration of CRISPR-based gene editing approaches. Our findings show that the F508del and W1282X mutations were the most extensively studied CF-causing variants, though over fifteen mutations were targeted overall. The majority of works under review explored the use of homology-directed repair (HDR) or base editing, with a growing number reporting efficient prime editing. Some studies tackled multiple individual mutations, compared different editors, or tested strategies across various models, while others focused on approaches that rescue CFTR function without directly correcting a mutation. Several works also proposed strategies that could address multiple variants with a single approach, while others highlighted technical difficulties in editing certain regions of the CFTR gene. This cross-study comparison also emphasizes the need for standardized reporting of editing efficiency and functional rescue, and stresses the importance of further single-cell RNA sequencing and in-vivo studies to reach clinically-relevant conclusions. However, as gene editing techniques continue to evolve, and with over sixty ongoing CRISPR-based clinical trials, there is growing optimism for meaningful advancements in CF gene-editing therapeutics.
CRISPR治疗囊性纤维化:来自系统综述的进展和见解。
囊性纤维化(CF)是一种由CFTR基因功能缺失突变引起的严重遗传疾病。基因编辑方法有可能纠正这种突变。本系统综述概述了主要基于crispr技术的机制,并通过交叉研究比较,分析了27篇应用这些技术靶向cf引起变异的研究文章。我们报告并讨论了在每项工作中实现的策略设计、靶细胞选择、编辑效率、编辑副产物的流行程度和CFTR功能恢复水平,旨在为进一步探索基于crispr的基因编辑方法提供技术见解。我们的研究结果表明,F508del和W1282X突变是研究最广泛的cf -致病变异,尽管总体上有超过15个突变被靶向。大多数研究都探讨了同源定向修复(HDR)或碱基编辑的使用,越来越多的研究报告了高效的原质编辑。一些研究解决了多个个体突变,比较了不同的编辑器,或在各种模型中测试了策略,而另一些研究则侧重于在不直接纠正突变的情况下挽救CFTR功能的方法。一些研究还提出了可以用一种方法解决多种变异的策略,而其他研究则强调了编辑CFTR基因某些区域的技术困难。这种交叉研究比较也强调了编辑效率和功能挽救的标准化报告的必要性,并强调了进一步进行单细胞RNA测序和体内研究以得出临床相关结论的重要性。然而,随着基因编辑技术的不断发展,以及超过60个正在进行的基于crispr的临床试验,人们对CF基因编辑疗法取得有意义的进展越来越乐观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Therapy
Molecular Therapy 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
19.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
357
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Therapy is the leading journal for research in gene transfer, vector development, stem cell manipulation, and therapeutic interventions. It covers a broad spectrum of topics including genetic and acquired disease correction, vaccine development, pre-clinical validation, safety/efficacy studies, and clinical trials. With a focus on advancing genetics, medicine, and biotechnology, Molecular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed research, reviews, and commentaries to showcase the latest advancements in the field. With an impressive impact factor of 12.4 in 2022, it continues to attract top-tier contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信