Impact of Living in a Food Desert on Complications After Fracture Surgery.

I Leah Gitajn,Joseph D Phillips,Yinzhou Wang,Christina A Stennett,Gerard Chang,Nathan N O'Hara,Devon T Brameier,Arvind G von Keudell,Michael J Weaver,Gregory J Della Rocca,Holly T Pilson,Patrick F Bergin,Sheila Sprague,Gerard P Slobogean,
{"title":"Impact of Living in a Food Desert on Complications After Fracture Surgery.","authors":"I Leah Gitajn,Joseph D Phillips,Yinzhou Wang,Christina A Stennett,Gerard Chang,Nathan N O'Hara,Devon T Brameier,Arvind G von Keudell,Michael J Weaver,Gregory J Della Rocca,Holly T Pilson,Patrick F Bergin,Sheila Sprague,Gerard P Slobogean,","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.01184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nFood deserts-communities with limited access to healthy food-have been linked with poor surgical outcomes; however, their impact on orthopaedic trauma outcomes remains unknown. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of food desert residency among orthopaedic trauma patients and to investigate the impact of food desert residency on the rate of unplanned reoperation with use of a large, high-quality, prospectively collected dataset with adjudicated outcomes. We hypothesized that orthopaedic trauma patients would reside in food deserts at a higher rate than the general U.S. population and that living in a food desert would be independently associated with an increased rate of unplanned reoperation.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe included all patients from the Aqueous-PREP and PREPARE trials who had documented ZIP codes. The primary outcome was unplanned reoperation within 1 year, and the secondary outcomes included the reasons for reoperation. Residing in a food desert was the independent variable and was defined by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Census tracts were converted to ZIP codes in order to assign food access for an individual's residence with use of the USDA Food Access Research Atlas.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf the 2,607 patients included, 1,453 (55.7%) lived in a ZIP code containing a food desert compared with 49% of the U.S. population. Patients residing in a food desert were 42% female, 26.6% non-White, and 64% employed prior to injury, whereas patients not residing in a food desert were 41% female, 15% non-White, and 63% employed prior to injury, all of which was collected via patient self-report. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that living in a food desert was independently associated with 40% higher odds of unplanned reoperation (odds ratio [OR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 1.85; p = 0.019). This was driven by reoperation for delayed union or nonunion (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.19 to 2.57; p = 0.004) and reoperation for a wound-healing complication (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.54; p = 0.044).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis study found a strong association between residing in a ZIP code containing a food desert and an increased rate of unplanned reoperation, which was primarily driven by delayed union or nonunion and wound-healing complications. Addressing nutritional deficiencies in this population may help to effectively triage the use of health-care resources. Further research should focus on clarifying specific deficiencies and assessing the effectiveness of targeted interventions.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nPrognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"60-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.01184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Food deserts-communities with limited access to healthy food-have been linked with poor surgical outcomes; however, their impact on orthopaedic trauma outcomes remains unknown. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of food desert residency among orthopaedic trauma patients and to investigate the impact of food desert residency on the rate of unplanned reoperation with use of a large, high-quality, prospectively collected dataset with adjudicated outcomes. We hypothesized that orthopaedic trauma patients would reside in food deserts at a higher rate than the general U.S. population and that living in a food desert would be independently associated with an increased rate of unplanned reoperation. METHODS We included all patients from the Aqueous-PREP and PREPARE trials who had documented ZIP codes. The primary outcome was unplanned reoperation within 1 year, and the secondary outcomes included the reasons for reoperation. Residing in a food desert was the independent variable and was defined by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Census tracts were converted to ZIP codes in order to assign food access for an individual's residence with use of the USDA Food Access Research Atlas. RESULTS Of the 2,607 patients included, 1,453 (55.7%) lived in a ZIP code containing a food desert compared with 49% of the U.S. population. Patients residing in a food desert were 42% female, 26.6% non-White, and 64% employed prior to injury, whereas patients not residing in a food desert were 41% female, 15% non-White, and 63% employed prior to injury, all of which was collected via patient self-report. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that living in a food desert was independently associated with 40% higher odds of unplanned reoperation (odds ratio [OR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 1.85; p = 0.019). This was driven by reoperation for delayed union or nonunion (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.19 to 2.57; p = 0.004) and reoperation for a wound-healing complication (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.54; p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS This study found a strong association between residing in a ZIP code containing a food desert and an increased rate of unplanned reoperation, which was primarily driven by delayed union or nonunion and wound-healing complications. Addressing nutritional deficiencies in this population may help to effectively triage the use of health-care resources. Further research should focus on clarifying specific deficiencies and assessing the effectiveness of targeted interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
生活在食物荒漠中对骨折术后并发症的影响。
食物沙漠——获得健康食物的机会有限的社区——与手术效果差有关;然而,它们对骨科创伤结果的影响尚不清楚。本研究的目的是通过一个大型、高质量、前瞻性收集的数据集和已确定的结果,确定骨科创伤患者中食物沙漠住院的患病率,并调查食物沙漠住院对计划外再手术率的影响。我们假设,骨科创伤患者生活在食物沙漠中的比例高于普通美国人,生活在食物沙漠中的比例与计划外再手术的增加独立相关。方法我们纳入了所有来自水性prep和PREPARE试验的有邮政编码记录的患者。主要结局为1年内的非计划再手术,次要结局包括再手术的原因。居住在食物沙漠是独立变量,由美国农业部(USDA)定义。人口普查区被转换为邮政编码,以便使用美国农业部食品获取研究地图集分配个人住所的食品获取。结果在纳入的2607例患者中,1453例(55.7%)生活在包含食物沙漠的邮政编码地区,而美国人口的这一比例为49%。居住在食物沙漠的患者中女性占42%,非白人占26.6%,受伤前就业占64%,而非居住在食物沙漠的患者中女性占41%,非白人占15%,受伤前就业占63%,所有这些数据均通过患者自我报告收集。多变量分析表明,生活在食物沙漠中与计划外再手术的几率高出40%独立相关(优势比[OR], 1.40;95%置信区间[CI], 1.06 ~ 1.85;P = 0.019)。这是由于延迟愈合或不愈合而再次手术所致(or, 1.75;95% CI, 1.19 ~ 2.57;p = 0.004)和因伤口愈合并发症再次手术(OR, 1.60;95% CI, 1.01 ~ 2.54;P = 0.044)。结论:本研究发现,居住在含有食物沙漠的邮政编码地区与计划外再手术率的增加有很强的相关性,这主要是由延迟愈合或不愈合以及伤口愈合并发症引起的。解决这一人群的营养缺乏问题可能有助于有效地对保健资源的使用进行分类。进一步的研究应侧重于澄清具体的不足和评估有针对性的干预措施的有效性。证据水平:预后III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信