Assessing Patient Demographics Associated with Telehealth and In-Person Contraceptive Care at a Tertiary Care Institution.

Journal of women's health (2002) Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-17 DOI:10.1089/jwh.2024.0484
Amanda S Farrell, Anna Roselle, Elysia Larson, Annliz Macharia, Sara Neill
{"title":"Assessing Patient Demographics Associated with Telehealth and In-Person Contraceptive Care at a Tertiary Care Institution.","authors":"Amanda S Farrell, Anna Roselle, Elysia Larson, Annliz Macharia, Sara Neill","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To describe the patient population accessing in-person versus telehealth contraceptive care and to identify demographic disparities in telehealth care utilization. <b><i>Design:</i></b> We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients accessing telehealth and in-person contraceptive care at an academic health center between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021. Billing data were used to identify medical records for patients aged 18-54 who had a contraceptive visit during this time. Demographic and past medical history were collected from the electronic health record. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 1,435 unique patients were included. Of 1,691 total visits, 16% were telehealth visits. Being publicly insured was significantly associated with decreased likelihood of having a telehealth visit compared with an in-person visit and remained so after adjusting for race, marital status, and language (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]: 0.51, confidence interval [CI]: 0.33-0.78). Individuals aged 45 years and older were less likely to have telehealth visits (aRR: 0.52, CI: 0.27-1.02). Being single was positively associated with accessing telehealth contraceptive care (aRR: 1.57, CI: 1.06-2.23). There were no statistically significant associations by race or ethnicity. Intrauterine devices were the most commonly prescribed contraceptive type after an in-person visit (35%) while oral contraceptives were the most commonly prescribed after telehealth visits (37%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our study found decreased utilization of telehealth for contraceptive care among patients who are publicly insured and older than 45. We found no differences in the use of telehealth for contraceptive care by race, ethnicity, or language. Telehealth is a powerful tool with the potential to increase equity in health care. It is important to continue research to understand how patient demographics affect use of telehealth for contraceptive care to facilitate more equitable access.</p>","PeriodicalId":520699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health (2002)","volume":" ","pages":"1135-1139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health (2002)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the patient population accessing in-person versus telehealth contraceptive care and to identify demographic disparities in telehealth care utilization. Design: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients accessing telehealth and in-person contraceptive care at an academic health center between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021. Billing data were used to identify medical records for patients aged 18-54 who had a contraceptive visit during this time. Demographic and past medical history were collected from the electronic health record. Results: A total of 1,435 unique patients were included. Of 1,691 total visits, 16% were telehealth visits. Being publicly insured was significantly associated with decreased likelihood of having a telehealth visit compared with an in-person visit and remained so after adjusting for race, marital status, and language (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]: 0.51, confidence interval [CI]: 0.33-0.78). Individuals aged 45 years and older were less likely to have telehealth visits (aRR: 0.52, CI: 0.27-1.02). Being single was positively associated with accessing telehealth contraceptive care (aRR: 1.57, CI: 1.06-2.23). There were no statistically significant associations by race or ethnicity. Intrauterine devices were the most commonly prescribed contraceptive type after an in-person visit (35%) while oral contraceptives were the most commonly prescribed after telehealth visits (37%). Conclusions: Our study found decreased utilization of telehealth for contraceptive care among patients who are publicly insured and older than 45. We found no differences in the use of telehealth for contraceptive care by race, ethnicity, or language. Telehealth is a powerful tool with the potential to increase equity in health care. It is important to continue research to understand how patient demographics affect use of telehealth for contraceptive care to facilitate more equitable access.

评估三级医疗机构与远程医疗和面对面避孕护理相关的患者人口统计数据。
目的:描述获得面对面与远程医疗避孕护理的患者群体,并确定远程医疗保健利用的人口差异。设计:我们对2021年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间在学术卫生中心获得远程医疗和面对面避孕护理的患者进行了回顾性图表回顾。账单数据用于确定18-54岁在此期间进行避孕访问的患者的医疗记录。从电子健康记录中收集人口统计和既往病史。结果:共纳入1435例独特患者。在1,691次总就诊中,16%是远程医疗就诊。与面对面就诊相比,公共保险与远程就诊的可能性降低显著相关,并且在调整种族、婚姻状况和语言后仍然如此(调整风险比[aRR]: 0.51,置信区间[CI]: 0.33-0.78)。45岁及以上的个体进行远程医疗访问的可能性较小(aRR: 0.52, CI: 0.27-1.02)。单身与获得远程保健避孕护理呈正相关(相对比:1.57,置信区间:1.06-2.23)。种族或民族之间没有统计学上的显著关联。宫内节育器是亲自就诊后最常开的避孕药具(35%),而口服避孕药是远程保健就诊后最常开的处方(37%)。结论:我们的研究发现,在公共保险和45岁以上的患者中,远程医疗对避孕护理的利用率有所下降。我们发现,在使用远程医疗避孕护理方面,种族、民族或语言没有差异。远程保健是一个强大的工具,有可能增加保健方面的公平性。重要的是继续开展研究,了解患者人口结构如何影响远程保健对避孕护理的使用,以促进更公平的获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信