A systematic review and meta-analysis of physical environmental enrichment to improve animal welfare-related outcomes in indoor cattle.

IF 2.3
Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) Pub Date : 2025-06-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/awf.2025.28
Ganimet Unsal, Kate F Johnson, Sokratis Stergiadis, Richard Bennett, Zoe E Barker
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of physical environmental enrichment to improve animal welfare-related outcomes in indoor cattle.","authors":"Ganimet Unsal, Kate F Johnson, Sokratis Stergiadis, Richard Bennett, Zoe E Barker","doi":"10.1017/awf.2025.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various physical environmental enrichment items such as brushes, ropes, teats, chains, balls, cowhides/blocks, at improving the welfare of indoor-housed calves, heifers, and cattle. This review of 33 peer-reviewed papers and one industry report evaluated different welfare-related outcomes following physical environmental enrichment, including feed intake, lying time, play and exploratory behaviour, aggression, stereotypic behaviour and cross-sucking behaviour. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that calves and heifers enrolled in experimental studies using enrichment items had significantly improved growth rates, and increased locomotor play, but the overall reduction in cross-sucking behaviour was small and non-significant. The effect of enrichment on feed intake, aggression/stereotypic behaviour, play behaviour, cleanliness score contrasted between studies, with some reporting improvements while others showed no effect of environmental enrichment in these parameters. The risk of bias assessment revealed limitations in researcher blinding, sequence generation, and allocation concealment across the literature assessing the effectiveness of environmental enrichment on animal welfare. Overall, this review underscores the significant positive impact of physical enrichment on the welfare and behaviour of indoor-housed cattle, while highlighting the need for further research to optimise enrichment strategies across different cattle age groups and housing conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":520228,"journal":{"name":"Animal welfare (South Mimms, England)","volume":"34 ","pages":"e37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12171782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal welfare (South Mimms, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2025.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various physical environmental enrichment items such as brushes, ropes, teats, chains, balls, cowhides/blocks, at improving the welfare of indoor-housed calves, heifers, and cattle. This review of 33 peer-reviewed papers and one industry report evaluated different welfare-related outcomes following physical environmental enrichment, including feed intake, lying time, play and exploratory behaviour, aggression, stereotypic behaviour and cross-sucking behaviour. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that calves and heifers enrolled in experimental studies using enrichment items had significantly improved growth rates, and increased locomotor play, but the overall reduction in cross-sucking behaviour was small and non-significant. The effect of enrichment on feed intake, aggression/stereotypic behaviour, play behaviour, cleanliness score contrasted between studies, with some reporting improvements while others showed no effect of environmental enrichment in these parameters. The risk of bias assessment revealed limitations in researcher blinding, sequence generation, and allocation concealment across the literature assessing the effectiveness of environmental enrichment on animal welfare. Overall, this review underscores the significant positive impact of physical enrichment on the welfare and behaviour of indoor-housed cattle, while highlighting the need for further research to optimise enrichment strategies across different cattle age groups and housing conditions.

物理环境富集改善室内牛动物福利相关结果的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本系统综述旨在评估各种物理环境富集物品(如刷子、绳索、奶头、链条、球、牛皮/块)在改善室内饲养的小牛、小母牛和牛的福利方面的有效性。本文回顾了33篇同行评议的论文和一份行业报告,评估了物理环境丰富后的不同福利相关结果,包括采食量、躺卧时间、玩耍和探索行为、攻击性、刻板印象行为和交叉吸吮行为。荟萃分析的结果显示,加入实验研究的小牛和小母牛使用浓缩物品显著提高了生长速度,增加了运动能力,但总体上交叉吸吮行为的减少很小且不显著。在不同的研究中,环境富集对采食量、攻击/刻板行为、游戏行为、清洁度评分的影响进行了对比,一些研究报告了这些参数的改善,而另一些研究则没有显示环境富集对这些参数的影响。偏倚评估的风险揭示了在评估环境富集对动物福利的有效性的文献中,研究者盲法、序列生成和分配隐藏的局限性。总体而言,本综述强调了身体富集对室内饲养牛的福利和行为的显著积极影响,同时强调了进一步研究以优化不同牛年龄组和住房条件下的富集策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信